Nick
Administrator
Surely if they have failed they shouldn't really have a choice if they leave?
Nice little earner though!
Surely if they have failed they shouldn't really have a choice if they leave?Sorry, what?
Failed asylum seeker families to be offered up to £40k to leave
The home secretary says the "incentives" will deliver a "significant saving to the taxpayer".www.bbc.co.uk
Feels like there's some key info missing. There's similar schemes in other countries so would assume what is planned is broadly in line with those.Surely if they have failed they shouldn't really have a choice if they leave?they should be forcibly removed anyway?
I’m claiming asylum from…Barbados. £40k please and I’ll go straight back!Surely if they have failed they shouldn't really have a choice if they leave?they should be forcibly removed anyway?
Nice little earner though!
Private jet as well?I’m claiming asylum from…Barbados. £40k please and I’ll go straight back!
Sorry, what?
Failed asylum seeker families to be offered up to £40k to leave
The home secretary says the "incentives" will deliver a "significant saving to the taxpayer".www.bbc.co.uk
I tell you what, I reckon if they offered 40k to many British citizens they would be off.
Oh and if course they’d be taxed on it and then according to most on here should be denied their pension.
I'd fuck off for far less than that if I didn't have family to look afterI tell you what, I reckon if they offered 40k to many British citizens they would be off.
Where would you go?I'd fuck off for far less than that if I didn't have family to look after
Feels like there's some key info missing. There's similar schemes in other countries so would assume what is planned is broadly in line with those.
It says the estimate is it will save £20m so it can't just be getting people who were being removed anyway to leave a week early!
CreteWhere would you go?
Was in a call about the thousands of boys physically and sexually abused for decades at medomsley
It's a one man band consultancy though, to bill income of that level in a year seems rather unusual especially when the employee has another job as an MP. The company might have subcontracted work out but that wouldn't have left £397k in liquid assets a few months later, would it?That doesn’t show that the business got a large cash injection from somewhere. That shows that the business made sales with very little cost attached; not uncommon for a consultancy-type business. Without a proper breakdown of creditors you’d have no idea whether these were other consultants owed money, tax liabilities or something else. Given there was no erroneous creditors declared in the liquidator’s report I don’t see how you can cast aspersions like this.
For reference, I don’t even know who the woman is beyond being an MP so no idea whether the sales element has anything fishy about it.
I'll start a crowd funderI'd fuck off for far less than that if I didn't have family to look after
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?