Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Do you want to discuss boring politics? (10 Viewers)

  • Thread starter mrtrench
  • Start date Jun 14, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 1753
  • 1754
  • 1755
  • 1756
  • 1757
  • …
  • 1770
Next
First Prev 1755 of 1770 Next Last

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,391
What’s going on?

Major concerns raised over voting at Gorton and Denton by-election

www.independent.co.uk
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,392
Grendel said:
People vote Reform partly because of these lazy slurs people like you make and offer zero alternatives to the people who will vote for them. You would just come across if you did talk to the average Reform voter as a condescending snob frankly.
Click to expand...
If they considered us to be condescending snobs then that's on them. If loads of people thought the Earth was flat should we just pander to that? From the G&D by-election I thought you weren't a fan of pandering to people and telling them what they want to hear just to get their votes?

If people want to call me a condescending twat because they can't be arsed to engage their brain, so be it.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,393
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
If they considered us to be condescending snobs then that's on them. If loads of people thought the Earth was flat should we just pander to that? From the G&D by-election I thought you weren't a fan of pandering to people and telling them what they want to hear just to get their votes?

If people want to call me a condescending twat because they can't be arsed to engage their brain, so be it.
Click to expand...
Farage dresses like a member of the landed gentry to be clear.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,394
PVA said:
I don't believe I've said there aren't any dodgy fuckers in Labour or the Greens. Sadly they are in all walks of life.

But reform just seems to be absolutely chock full of them.

As I say, crying electoral fraud is at best pathetic and at worst dangerous.
Click to expand...

Ooops

Labour want officials to examine reports over voting in Gorton and Denton by-election

Labour chairwoman Anna Turley reacts to a report by Democracy Volunteers that claimed to observe high levels of ‘family voting’
www.independent.co.uk
 
Reactions: SIR ERNIE

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,395
The meltdown on the right has been hilarious today. The best one being George Galloway handed the Greens the win by not fielding a candidate and then backing the Greens. Unfortunately the numbers don’t add up. The workers party got 3766 votes at the GE. Even on the assumption that all 3766 voters only voted Green on Galloways say so which in itself is a big assumption the fact remains that even without those votes the Greens still would have won by about 700 votes. Unless you want to believe 3766 voters who voted for the workers party last time would have voted for Reform had Galloway not told them to vote Green, which is just ridiculous.

Bunch of sore losing entitled melts.
 
Reactions: chiefdave, Sky Blue Pete, Earlsdon_Skyblue1 and 1 other person

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,396
skybluetony176 said:
The meltdown on the right has been hilarious today. The best one being George Galloway handed the Greens the win by not fielding a candidate and then backing the Greens. Unfortunately the numbers don’t add up. The workers party got 3766 votes at the GE. Even on the assumption that all 3766 voters only voted Green on Galloways say so which in itself is a big assumption the fact remains that even without those votes the Greens still would have won by about 700 votes. Unless you want to believe 3766 voters who voted for the workers party last time would have voted for Reform had Galloway not told them to vote Green, which is just ridiculous.

Bunch of sore losing entitled melts.
Click to expand...

Where you sitting tomorrow Tonester? Assume you managed to get a ticket.
 
Reactions: rob9872
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,397
Grendel said:
Ooops

Labour want officials to examine reports over voting in Gorton and Denton by-election

Labour chairwoman Anna Turley reacts to a report by Democracy Volunteers that claimed to observe high levels of ‘family voting’
www.independent.co.uk
Click to expand...

Oops what?

As I said, no reports from the council of this apparent electoral fraud. No reports from the police. No reports from any polling staff.

Why wait till after to raise it?
 
Reactions: Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,398
PVA said:
Oops what?

As I said, no reports from the council of this apparent electoral fraud. No reports from the police. No reports from any polling staff.

Why wait till after to raise it?
Click to expand...

Eh? The volunteer group are entirely independent and said they made a decision to only report after the event as they felt they didn’t feel comfortable confronting the people they suspected until after the election.

Why has Labour now commented?
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,399
Look's like Starmer has had all his Union flags confiscated after this by-election mayhem.
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,400
Grendel said:
Eh? The volunteer group are entirely independent and said they made a decision to only report after the event as they felt they didn’t feel comfortable confronting the people they suspected until after the election.

Why has Labour now commented?
Click to expand...

That's a pathetic excuse. They didn't have to confront the people they suspected - they should have called the police if they witnessed a crime, and/or report it to staff. They did neither.
 
Reactions: Grendel

Nick

Administrator
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,401
PVA said:
That's a pathetic excuse. They didn't have to confront the people they suspected - they should have called the police if they witnessed a crime, and/or report it to staff. They did neither.
Click to expand...

Mr Ault reportedly told Sky News that observers “did raise the issue of family voting with individual presiding officers during the day before we left or when they were not busy.”
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: Grendel
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,402
Won't let me quote you there @Nick for some reason.

That's such a non committal statement. They 'raised the issue' - great, so did they report individual instances and offences? Or did they just say 'look out for family voting'


Electoral fraud is such a serious issue, the police should have been called immediately. It just doesn't add up whatsoever.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,403
PVA said:
Won't let me quote you there @Nick for some reason.

That's such a non committal statement. They 'raised the issue' - great, so did they report individual instances and offences? Or did they just say 'look out for family voting'


Electoral fraud is such a serious issue, the police should have been called immediately. It just doesn't add up whatsoever.
Click to expand...

So these volunteers are lying? The guardian who are now reporting it are lying?

Wow!
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,404
Grendel said:
So these volunteers are lying? The guardian who are now reporting it are lying?

Wow!
Click to expand...

Missing the point as usual.

Thicker than the glass at the zoo.
 
Reactions: Grendel and Ccfcisparks

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,405
PVA said:
Missing the point as usual.

Thicker than the glass at the zoo.
Click to expand...

It’s clear you are struggling on this one.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,406
PVA said:
Won't let me quote you there @Nick for some reason.

That's such a non committal statement. They 'raised the issue' - great, so did they report individual instances and offences? Or did they just say 'look out for family voting'


Electoral fraud is such a serious issue, the police should have been called immediately. It just doesn't add up whatsoever.
Click to expand...

Ay?

they should have called the police if they witnessed a crime, and/or report it to staff. They did neither.
Click to expand...

did raise the issue of family voting with individual presiding officers during the day before we left or when they were not busy.
Click to expand...

Thats literally reporting it to staff.
 
Reactions: Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,407
Nick said:
Ay?





Thats literally reporting it to staff.
Click to expand...

Police are now looking at the evidence, I think to fair to him it must be devastating to learn his hero Starmer is total shite and even less popular than old Boris
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,408
You’d be stupid to claim “family voting” doesn’t happen, it’s always happened, I remember my gran used to have to vote for whoever my grandad told as he was the man of the house. It happens, it’s always happened and it always will happen.

The suggestion here is that it only benefitted one side, which is of course complete bollocks.

At the last general election my eldest missed out on being eligible to vote by a matter of weeks being one of the youngest in her school year. One of her friends was old enough was driven to the polling station by her parents and told in no uncertain terms to vote Reform, which she did. The only example I personally know of since my grandfather died which led to my gran voting Labour for the first time in her life as this particular grandfather was a Tory.

Who’s to say that the family voting apparently witnessed wasn’t right wing extremists making their family vote Reform? After all, reform won over 10000 votes and nearly 29% of the vote share. Surely no one is dumb enough to believe that not one single husband wasn’t telling the wife and kids to vote Reform and then either supervising their postal votes or chauffeuring them together to the polling station with instructions on how to vote.

I’d also point out that young voters really don’t need that much encouragement to vote green, most of them are already there. Take my daughters friend for instance, she left home for Uni, is now in a different environment where GB news isn’t the staple and is now a Green Party member who’s more than a little embarrassed that she allowed her parents to strong arm her into voting Reform at the general election.

We’ve also been here before with Boris’ voter ID reforms to stop people voting by claiming they’re someone else at the polling station. When the actual data came out in those circumstances (aside from the fact that it happened so little it changed absolutely fuck all in any election anywhere ever in the UK) it turned out that the biggest perpetrators were on the right.
 
Reactions: Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,409
skybluetony176 said:
You’d be stupid to claim “family voting” doesn’t happen, it’s always happened, I remember my gran used to have to vote for whoever my grandad told as he was the man of the house. It happens, it’s always happened and it always will happen.

The suggestion here is that it only benefitted one side, which is of course complete bollocks.

At the last general election my eldest missed out on being eligible to vote by a matter of weeks being one of the youngest in her school year. One of her friends was old enough was driven to the polling station by her parents and told in no uncertain terms to vote Reform, which she did. The only example I personally know of since my grandfather died which led to my gran voting Labour for the first time in her life as this particular grandfather was a Tory.

Who’s to say that the family voting apparently witnessed wasn’t right wing extremists making their family vote Reform? After all, reform won over 10000 votes and nearly 29% of the vote share. Surely no one is dumb enough to believe that not one single husband wasn’t telling the wife and kids to vote Reform and then either supervising their postal votes or chauffeuring them together to the polling station with instructions on how to vote.

I’d also point out that young voters really don’t need that much encouragement to vote green, most of them are already there. Take my daughters friend for instance, she left home for Uni, is now in a different environment where GB news isn’t the staple and is now a Green Party member who’s more than a little embarrassed that she allowed her parents to strong arm her into voting Reform at the general election.

We’ve also been here before with Boris’ voter ID reforms to stop people voting by claiming they’re someone else at the polling station. When the actual data came out in those circumstances (aside from the fact that it happened so little it changed absolutely fuck all in any election anywhere ever in the UK) it turned out that the biggest perpetrators were on the right.
Click to expand...

You do know what the actual term means as an offence?
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,410
skybluetony176 said:
You’d be stupid to claim “family voting” doesn’t happen, it’s always happened, I remember my gran used to have to vote for whoever my grandad told as he was the man of the house. It happens, it’s always happened and it always will happen.

The suggestion here is that it only benefitted one side, which is of course complete bollocks.

At the last general election my eldest missed out on being eligible to vote by a matter of weeks being one of the youngest in her school year. One of her friends was old enough was driven to the polling station by her parents and told in no uncertain terms to vote Reform, which she did. The only example I personally know of since my grandfather died which led to my gran voting Labour for the first time in her life as this particular grandfather was a Tory.

Who’s to say that the family voting apparently witnessed wasn’t right wing extremists making their family vote Reform? After all, reform won over 10000 votes and nearly 29% of the vote share. Surely no one is dumb enough to believe that not one single husband wasn’t telling the wife and kids to vote Reform and then either supervising their postal votes or chauffeuring them together to the polling station with instructions on how to vote.

I’d also point out that young voters really don’t need that much encouragement to vote green, most of them are already there. Take my daughters friend for instance, she left home for Uni, is now in a different environment where GB news isn’t the staple and is now a Green Party member who’s more than a little embarrassed that she allowed her parents to strong arm her into voting Reform at the general election.

We’ve also been here before with Boris’ voter ID reforms to stop people voting by claiming they’re someone else at the polling station. When the actual data came out in those circumstances (aside from the fact that it happened so little it changed absolutely fuck all in any election anywhere ever in the UK) it turned out that the biggest perpetrators were on the right.
Click to expand...
As I understand it, family voting is just a reference and was witnessed at the ballot box not someone telling their spouse or friends who to vote for.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,411
"In the other recent Westminster parliamentary by-election in Runcorn and Helsby we saw family voting in 12% of polling stations, affecting 1% of voters. In Gorton and Denton, we observed family voting in 68% of polling stations, affecting 12% of those voters observed."

The group said their observers attended several polling stations and saw family voting in 15 of the 22 polling stations observed, 32 cases in total, with nine cases in one polling station alone. The team observed a sample of 545 voters casting their vote, meaning 12% of those voters observed either caused or were affected by family voting.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,412
rob9872 said:
As I understand it, family voting is just a reference and was witnessed at the ballot box not someone telling their spouse or friends who to vote for.
Click to expand...
What does it mean Rob??
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,413
Sky Blue Pete said:
What does it mean Rob??
Click to expand...
Just posted an example above from 'Democracy Volunteers '
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,414
rob9872 said:
As I understand it, family voting is just a reference and was witnessed at the ballot box not someone telling their spouse or friends who to vote for.
Click to expand...

Why bother? It’s literal drivel and fabricated scenarios as ever. I’m surprised we didn’t hear about a “relative” of his who lived there and dragged his wife by the hair to vote reform.

I don’t understand why he’s on here spouting shite. At least when he bigged up Cameron and the tories and admitted being a Farage voter he was vaguely funny
 
Reactions: SBAndy

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,415
Grendel said:
Why bother? It’s literal drivel and fabricated scenarios as ever. I’m surprised we didn’t hear about a “relative” of his who lived there and dragged his wife by the hair to vote reform.

I don’t understand why he’s on here spouting shite. At least when he bigged up Cameron and the tories and admitted being a Farage voter he was vaguely funny
Click to expand...
Do you know what specifically it means Grendel?
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,416
Sky Blue Pete said:
Do you know what specifically it means Grendel?
Click to expand...
I believe it's actually watching over a vote to ensure that they actually vote the way they've been pressured to do so rather than a gentle suggestion. Could be wrong, but but that's how I interpret it.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,417
Sky Blue Pete said:
Do you know what specifically it means Grendel?
Click to expand...

its someone standing over someone in the box while they actually vote abd observing the vote
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,418
skybluetony176 said:
You’d be stupid to claim “family voting” doesn’t happen, it’s always happened, I remember my gran used to have to vote for whoever my grandad told as he was the man of the house. It happens, it’s always happened and it always will happen.
Click to expand...
It takes you seconds on the Demoncary Now website to discover this is something they seem to find at every single election. Thing is they report it happening in such large numbers pretty much everyone on here who votes would have witnessed it happen. Has anyone?

Maybe it is a widespread issue, and if it is it needs to be addressed and taken seriously, but it seems somewhat strange that this group see it everywhere they go yet election officers and police present don't. Even when the Conservatives were desperately looking for evidence of election fraud to bring in stricter ID requirements this never got a mention.

It only seems to have become an issue when Farage picked up on it and declared, in Trump-esque manner, that the election was fixed. Yet nobody seems to have been able to point to anything from Democracy Now to indicate that this benefited the Greens.
 
Reactions: Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,419
I only heard about it on the Matt Chorley politics show. Someone in it said it’s not actually the correct term but it’s voter intimidation.

It seems cross party consensus agreed that two volunteers would observe behaviour in polling centres. This has come about as observations were that in certain areas there were far more instances than normal of the rule breaches whereby someone is basically telling another how to vote and for who
 
Reactions: MickM

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,420
chiefdave said:
It takes you seconds on the Demoncary Now website to discover this is something they seem to find at every single election. Thing is they report it happening in such large numbers pretty much everyone on here who votes would have witnessed it happen. Has anyone?

Maybe it is a widespread issue, and if it is it needs to be addressed and taken seriously, but it seems somewhat strange that this group see it everywhere they go yet election officers and police present don't. Even when the Conservatives were desperately looking for evidence of election fraud to bring in stricter ID requirements this never got a mention.

It only seems to have become an issue when Farage picked up on it and declared, in Trump-esque manner, that the election was fixed. Yet nobody seems to have been able to point to anything from Democracy Now to indicate that this benefited the Greens.
Click to expand...

Amsterdam moment 3 in 24 hours!
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,421
chiefdave said:
It takes you seconds on the Demoncary Now website to discover this is something they seem to find at every single election. Thing is they report it happening in such large numbers pretty much everyone on here who votes would have witnessed it happen. Has anyone?

Maybe it is a widespread issue, and if it is it needs to be addressed and taken seriously, but it seems somewhat strange that this group see it everywhere they go yet election officers and police present don't. Even when the Conservatives were desperately looking for evidence of election fraud to bring in stricter ID requirements this never got a mention.

It only seems to have become an issue when Farage picked up on it and declared, in Trump-esque manner, that the election was fixed. Yet nobody seems to have been able to point to anything from Democracy Now to indicate that this benefited the Greens.
Click to expand...
It does, but independents say they normally observe 1% and this was 12%. 1% still too high and needs stamping out, but certainly a step change here. What you cant control either way though is postal votes so they could be influenced or even fabricated and cant be controlled.
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,422
Nick said:
Thats literally reporting it to staff.
Click to expand...

Again, they 'raised the issue'. Is that reporting actual incidents or generally raising the point?

There's a massive difference.

There is also this:

During their time volunteering, the person said: “I saw one example but it was a family member helping their elderly relative into the booth, so this is where the grey line is as what actually is family voting.”

“I’d be interested in their methodology of what constitutes family voting, as the example above makes me wonder what is being reported,” they added.
Click to expand...


If there are concerns then it should be investigated, no issue with that, it's only right.

But Farage claiming the election was rigged, greens cheated etc, is just pathetic Trumpism.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,423
Grendel said:
Amsterdam moment 3 in 24 hours!
Click to expand...
What is this? Keep seeing it mentioned. Windmilling?
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,424
Anybody enlighten me on the Amsterdam moment?
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • #61,425
She looks like she's taken something.

 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 1753
  • 1754
  • 1755
  • 1756
  • 1757
  • …
  • 1770
Next
First Prev 1755 of 1770 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?