Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Do you want to discuss boring politics? (18 Viewers)

  • Thread starter mrtrench
  • Start date Jun 14, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 1625
  • 1626
  • 1627
  • 1628
Next
First Prev 1627 of 1628 Next Last

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:43 PM
  • #56,911
rob9872 said:
They don't but you're giving too much credit to the average voter who doesnt post on politics discussions and has all of the msm telling them everything is shit, broken and expensive.
Click to expand...


It is shit, broken and expensive. This is being experience up and down the country say in day out. Hence why reform will be the next government

I dont see how anyone can be in denial about it
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:44 PM
  • #56,912
The next election will be in 2029, things can and likely will look very different then.

The Miliband lead Labour party were once 12 points clear much closer to a GE than we are.

Polls mean very little when you are this far out from an election.
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:45 PM
  • #56,913
SBT said:
I agree with you that the cost of living is ridiculous and the emergency services are often an embarrassment. Fair enough if you wouldn’t trust the Tories or Labour to fix it (I don’t either). And fair enough if you think Reform’s policies to fix those things are better than the alternatives. But why say that if you don’t know what the actual policies are?
Click to expand...



I think id vote for Colenel Gadaffi at the moment, tbh mate. I just want change
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:46 PM
  • #56,914
Grendel said:
neither main party offers anything but the same grey mushy gruel for a lot of the population so for them how’s it going to be worse?
Click to expand...

Yeah, this is it. Hard to argue otherwise atm for me.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:46 PM
  • #56,915
Saddlebrains said:
It is shit, broken and expensive. This is being experience up and down the country say in day out. Hence why reform will be the next government

I dont see how anyone can be in denial about it
Click to expand...
I'm agreeing with you, just saying that they have no policies to combat anything. Their mandate would be given on the basis that they're 'not the other lot' which is pretty much how Labour were given an opportunity in the last GE.

If Labour are smart, they still have over three years to rectify things and I think they can, as an election isn't tomorrow, but if they carry on as they are, they'll be finished too.
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:47 PM
  • #56,916
Saddlebrains said:
I think id vote for Colenel Gadaffi at the moment, tbh mate. I just want change
Click to expand...
It's been just over a year since the last election. It does take time to try and reverse 14 years of managed decline.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:48 PM
  • #56,917
SBT said:
No, but you have to question why it’s Reform that benefits rather than say, the Greens or Lib Dems.
Click to expand...

Well I can’t see a party led by a man whose main claim to fame is he believed he could hypnotise women into getting their breasts enlarged to be gaining that much traction and there’s only so many times we can see Ed Davey fall into a lake.
 
Reactions: mmttww, SkyBlueDom26, TomRad85 and 1 other person

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Today at 12:49 PM
  • #56,918
Grendel said:
I don’t think it really matters. People do underestimate Farage. He’s a bit like Alec Salmond - pretty skilled at whipping people up over an issue and getting many engaged.

I think he will run out of steam and unless gets some real hard hitters from the Tory Party get a bit exposed in an election.

The reality is though neither main party offers anything but the same grey mushy gruel for a lot of the population so for them how’s it going to be worse?
Click to expand...
I agree with you. At this point I think most people couldn't care less about policies. I think there's a very good chance he'll become PM and will be surprised if he doesn't. As has been said though, if/when things don't actually improve for the average person, what comes next?
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:49 PM
  • #56,919
David O'Day said:
It's been just over a year since the last election. It does take time to try and reverse 14 years of managed decline.
Click to expand...


I agree, and i think we all hope to see some progress. I hope we do, because surely this shit sandwich we all have to swallow whilst paying our taxes for every month cant get worse. Can it?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:51 PM
  • #56,920
Saddlebrains said:
I doubt that. Labour will be obliterated like the tories

Things is with this, the whole rhetoric of reform voters being racist etc doesnt stack up does it?

This shows that Reform as it stands will almost get a full majority. Is the whole country now suddenly racist? I dont think so. I think the fact you can get a Tesco shop to your door quicker than a copper, waiting 15 hours for an Ambulance and no one having any money to ever do anything despite working their bollocks off says more on this projection
Click to expand...
I fully agree with those frustrations but think Reform are completely the wrong answer and will make it worse. Shows to me that an effective centre left party would wipe the floor and stay in for a generation.
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:52 PM
  • #56,921
Im assuming were all very similar in what we want on here

A safe world for our children where they can prosper
Criminals dealt with harshly
Illegal migration to be rectified
An NHS that works and protects us all
Some more expendable income to enjoy our lives instead of it all being taken away from us by greedy profiteering corps
 
Reactions: Blind-Faith

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:52 PM
  • #56,922
Why does everyone keep saying 14 years? If we apply the same logic the first term was a coalition, the second was clearing up all those years since 96 of 'not being in power, then it was Brexit and Covid resulting in huge Furlough payments and global recession. I'm not suggesting they were good or did anything to be proud of, but to say they were at fault for everything happening now is equally disingenuous and I'm pretty sure if it had been a Labour gov't during those years, we'd be reading excuses. Yes Labour haven't been in long, but their tenure so far is pretty poor and I don't even see shoots of recovery that they've implemented. Hopefully the next three years improves that.
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:57 PM
  • #56,923
rob9872 said:
Why does everyone keep saying 14 years? If we apply the same logic the first term was a coalition, the second was clearing up all those years since 96 of 'not being in power, then it was Brexit and Covid resulting in huge Furlough payments and global recession. I'm not suggesting they were good or did anything to be proud of, but to say they were at fault for everything happening now is equally disingenuous and I'm pretty sure if it had been a Labour gov't during those years, we'd be reading excuses. Yes Labour haven't been in long, but their tenure so far is pretty poor and I don't even see shoots of recovery that they've implemented. Hopefully the next three years improves that.
Click to expand...
it was a coalition led by the tories and it took an economy that was growing and implemented the failed and based on a spreadsheet error austerity policy
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:59 PM
  • #56,924
rob9872 said:
Why does everyone keep saying 14 years? If we apply the same logic the first term was a coalition, the second was clearing up all those years since 96 of 'not being in power, then it was Brexit and Covid resulting in huge Furlough payments and global recession. I'm not suggesting they were good or did anything to be proud of, but to say they were at fault for everything happening now is equally disingenuous and I'm pretty sure if it had been a Labour gov't during those years, we'd be reading excuses. Yes Labour haven't been in long, but their tenure so far is pretty poor and I don't even see shoots of recovery that they've implemented. Hopefully the next three years improves that.
Click to expand...

Tbf the outright lies from starmer haven't helped. We've all seen the 'you will not pay a penny more council tax' and 'under a labour government the energy price cap will not go up' videos
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:59 PM
  • #56,925
Saddlebrains said:
Im assuming were all very similar in what we want on here

A safe world for our children where they can prosper
Criminals dealt with harshly
Illegal migration to be rectified
An NHS that works and protects us all
Some more expendable income to enjoy our lives instead of it all being taken away from us by greedy profiteering corps
Click to expand...
Reform will fix all of that, especially the first 2
 
N

Northants Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:03 PM
  • #56,926
Saddlebrains said:
Im assuming were all very similar in what we want on here

A safe world for our children where they can prosper
Criminals dealt with harshly
Illegal migration to be rectified
An NHS that works and protects us all
Some more expendable income to enjoy our lives instead of it all being taken away from us by greedy profiteering corps
Click to expand...
I'm up for all of that- Reform havent said how they'd address any of it (and are funded themselves by greedy profiteering corps)

Fucking balloons are too busy platforming batshit stuff about Swans and Paracetamol causing Autism
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:05 PM
  • #56,927
I went to a medium and small business gathering the other week. Business confidence is very low.

Oddly without businesses being profitable no one gets employed in the private sector.

I’ve seen two suppliers and three customers go to the wall in the last 6 months. This is nothing to do with 14 years of austerity but due to the nonsense policies of a government that cannot grasp how business operates and what it needs. The last government wasn’t great but at least it left most of the manufacturing sector unscathed - the real fear amongst a lot was they’ll go again with more tax measures
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:06 PM
  • #56,928
SkyBlueDom26 said:
Reform will fix all of that, especially the first 2
Click to expand...
how, what are their policies on these things?

Currently their last "policies" were an anti immigration policy that fell apart in a day and a policy that removes ilr which is something legal immigrants such as doctors use not illegal immigrants

how are they funding the nhs? how are they going to replace the doctors lost because of their own policies?

their economic policy is at the moment is truss on crack so how will they help with the cost of living?
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:08 PM
  • #56,929
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
I've often wondered what would happen if you introduced the Bible Belt of America to the teachings of Christ as laid out in the actual bible. Going by that Jesus would hate America.
Click to expand...
Jesus never hated countries.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:10 PM
  • #56,930
fatso said:
Jesus never hated countries.
Click to expand...
he wasn't too keen about Rome
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:11 PM
  • #56,931
Grendel said:
I went to a medium and small business gathering the other week. Business confidence is very low.

Oddly without businesses being profitable no one gets employed in the private sector.

I’ve seen two suppliers and three customers go to the wall in the last 6 months. This is nothing to do with 14 years of austerity but due to the nonsense policies of a government that cannot grasp how business operates and what it needs. The last government wasn’t great but at least it left most of the manufacturing sector unscathed - the real fear amongst a lot was they’ll go again with more tax measures
Click to expand...
Not surprising when you look at the labour front bench, how many of the ministers have ever ran a profitable business?

And if you were a business owner, how many labour ministers would you want to employ?

When the tory party was kicked out of office for being completely incompetent, we never thought for one minute that they would be replaced by an even worse government!
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:14 PM
  • #56,932
fatso said:
Not surprising when you look at the labour front bench, how many of the ministers have ever ran a profitable business?

And if you were a business owner, how many labour ministers would you want to employ?

When the tory party was kicked out of office for being completely incompetent, we never thought for one minute that they would be replaced by an even worse government!
Click to expand...
why would you need to run a profitable business? it's completely different.

bet you think economics is like a credit card and all that bollocks
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:15 PM
  • #56,933
David O'Day said:
he wasn't too keen about Rome
Click to expand...
There's always this!
 
Reactions: wingy

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:17 PM
  • #56,934
David O'Day said:
why would you need to run a profitable business? it's completely different.

bet you think economics is like a credit card and all that bollocks
Click to expand...
Well you'd like to think that people who make daily decisions that have such an effect on business, would have some kind of clue.

Your second comment makes zero sense.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:19 PM
  • #56,935
fatso said:
Well you'd like to think that people who make daily decisions that have such an effect on business, would have some kind of clue.

Your second comment makes zero sense.
Click to expand...
That makes no sense, macroeconomics isn't anything like "running a business".
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:20 PM
  • #56,936
David O'Day said:
That makes no sense, macroeconomics isn't anything like "running a business".
Click to expand...
What the fuck are you prattling on about?

Its 1.20 in the afternoon, that's way too early to be off your tits!
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:28 PM
  • #56,937
Saddlebrains said:
I agree, and i think we all hope to see some progress. I hope we do, because surely this shit sandwich we all have to swallow whilst paying our taxes for every month cant get worse. Can it?
Click to expand...
Saddlebrains said:
Im assuming were all very similar in what we want on here

A safe world for our children where they can prosper
Criminals dealt with harshly
Illegal migration to be rectified
An NHS that works and protects us all
Some more expendable income to enjoy our lives instead of it all being taken away from us by greedy profiteering corps
Click to expand...
Agreed, everyone wants basically the same thing, at least broadly speaking.

But it can definitely get worse. We've got huge problems coming down the line that nobody wants to even discuss much less actually offer a solution to.

The fundamental issue of how you generate the funds to be able to provide all the things you list when the costs are only going one way.

You've got an aging population who increasingly need years of care. You've got an increasingly unhealthy working age population, both mentally and physically, which is not an issue you can just solve by changing the definition of who is sick. Automation (or as we now seem to call it AI) will continue to cut the amount of jobs available.

That's before you even consider that we've got to undo more than a decade of damage from austerity.

The way things are done now doesn't work and seems increasingly not fit for purpose but nobody is having the difficult conversations about what comes next.
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:32 PM
  • #56,938
chiefdave said:
Agreed, everyone wants basically the same thing, at least broadly speaking.

But it can definitely get worse. We've got huge problems coming down the line that nobody wants to even discuss much less actually offer a solution to.

The fundamental issue of how you generate the funds to be able to provide all the things you list when the costs are only going one way.

You've got an aging population who increasingly need years of care. You've got an increasingly unhealthy working age population, both mentally and physically, which is not an issue you can just solve by changing the definition of who is sick. Automation (or as we now seem to call it AI) will continue to cut the amount of jobs available.

That's before you even consider that we've got to undo more than a decade of damage from austerity.

The way things are done now doesn't work and seems increasingly not fit for purpose but nobody is having the difficult conversations about what comes next.
Click to expand...
Yes, this is it.

The pension system was designed for a population who lived maybe 5 or 10 if lucky years after retiring and now we have a population where it's not rare at all to like say 20 or so years after retiring. It needs major change but no one has the balls to do it as it could be electoral suicide.
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains and mmttww

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:33 PM
  • #56,939
Evo1883 said:
No coincidence this was published 2 days ago https://institute.global/insights/p...tal-id-a-new-consensus-for-a-state-that-works


Tony Blair has his finger in this pie somewhere then
Click to expand...

It's been a long held desire of that maniac.
 
Reactions: wingy and Sick Boy

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:35 PM
  • #56,940
chiefdave said:
Agreed, everyone wants basically the same thing, at least broadly speaking.

But it can definitely get worse. We've got huge problems coming down the line that nobody wants to even discuss much less actually offer a solution to.

The fundamental issue of how you generate the funds to be able to provide all the things you list when the costs are only going one way.

You've got an aging population who increasingly need years of care. You've got an increasingly unhealthy working age population, both mentally and physically, which is not an issue you can just solve by changing the definition of who is sick. Automation (or as we now seem to call it AI) will continue to cut the amount of jobs available.

That's before you even consider that we've got to undo more than a decade of damage from austerity.

The way things are done now doesn't work and seems increasingly not fit for purpose but nobody is having the difficult conversations about what comes next.
Click to expand...

it is a currency issuing government, it does not need to 'generate funds'
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:37 PM
  • #56,941
Grendel said:
I went to a medium and small business gathering the other week. Business confidence is very low.

Oddly without businesses being profitable no one gets employed in the private sector.

I’ve seen two suppliers and three customers go to the wall in the last 6 months. This is nothing to do with 14 years of austerity but due to the nonsense policies of a government that cannot grasp how business operates and what it needs. The last government wasn’t great but at least it left most of the manufacturing sector unscathed - the real fear amongst a lot was they’ll go again with more tax measures
Click to expand...

the employer NI rise is an austerity policy - the objective of it is to "reduce the national debt" - which is essentially removing money from the private sector
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:40 PM
  • #56,942
fernandopartridge said:
it is a currency issuing government, it does not need to 'generate funds'
Click to expand...
Yes but if you issue too much currency you increase inflation.
 
Reactions: LarryGrayson
D

Dougin

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:41 PM
  • #56,943
Don’t underestimate the pull Farage has. He speaks common sense and seems to come from the heart. He doesn’t need to do this, he wants to and people will relate to that.

He’s not your typical career politician, at least he believes in what he says. Starmer is not a natural leader and comes across as a weak person.

People laughed at Farage for years, no one ever took him serious and look what he did with brexit.

When it comes to election time he has Trump and Musk on his side can you just imagine how much they are going to help him too. It’s only going one way.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:42 PM
  • #56,944
fernandopartridge said:
it is a currency issuing government, it does not need to 'generate funds'
Click to expand...
to an extent but you can't just issue billions extra year in, year out without it having an impact
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:43 PM
  • #56,945
Dougin said:
People laughed at Farage for years, no one ever took him serious and look what he did with brexit.
Click to expand...
If people looked what he did with Brexit he wouldn't be getting any votes!!!
 
Reactions: wingy and PVA
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 1625
  • 1626
  • 1627
  • 1628
Next
First Prev 1627 of 1628 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ccfcno96 minutes ago
  • ... and 1 more.
  • Total: 11 (members: 2, guests: 9)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • General Discussion
    • Off Topic Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?