So how will you beat that direction of travel if you don't mind me asking?
I agree that the employers NI contributions are the wrong policy to adopt, but I am not sure about your numbers. ONS data seems to show that private sector employment has a greater share of employment in 2025 than it did in 2024, i.e. it has grown quicker.My personal view is that the tax burden has reached the critical mass where any new taxes will have diminished returns. A pertinent example here has been the disastrous increase of ‘employers NI’ which has resulted in hours being cut, hiring freezes or even redundancies - particularly impacting young people. Payrolls in the private sector has sharply declined (minus 153k) since this ‘jobs tax’ was introduced but simultaneously the public sector has grown by 75k (or thereabouts).
Of course that Ni contribution was okay when it was implemented by Boris and taken away by Hunt.🫣Too soon for Labour policies to have affected we're told with negative stories, so assume this employment gain is thanks to 14 years of Tory government decisions.
You're welcome
I agree that the employers NI contributions are the wrong policy to adopt, but I am not sure about your numbers. ONS data seems to show that private sector employment has a greater share of employment in 2025 than it did in 2024, i.e. it has grown quicker.
EMP02: Public and private sector employment - Office for National Statistics
Public and private sector employment, UK, published quarterly, seasonally adjusted.www.ons.gov.uk
Just like the US then,?Also, the ONS:
Earnings and employment from Pay As You Earn Real Time Information, UK - Office for National Statistics
Monthly estimates of payrolled employees and their pay from HM Revenue and Customs’ (HMRC’s) Pay As You Earn (PAYE) Real Time Information (RTI) data.www.ons.gov.uk
The ONS is also being probed for its data quality and there a serious questions on it’s reliability as a statistics office.
Too soon for Labour policies to have affected we're told with negative stories, so assume this employment gain is thanks to 14 years of Tory government decisions.
You're welcome
I'm afraid I've not been a good boy on SM. I don't tweet often as I end up getting embroiled in trolling celebrities (only ever had 2 posts go viral and they were to David Baddiel and Ant McPartlin). My original account was blocked, so now I only follow Cov accounts really,I believe there's a sudden vacancy for a new spin doctor at Number 10.
Assuming that you've been behaving yourself on social media for the last ten years or so, I think you'd be a good fit.
No, the job vacancies and payrolls declining simultaneously is a direct impact of Labour’s policy.Too soon for Labour policies to have affected we're told with negative stories, so assume this employment gain is thanks to 14 years of Tory government decisions.
You're welcome
I'm afraid I've not been a good boy on SM. I don't tweet often as I end up getting embroiled in trolling celebrities (only ever had 2 posts go viral and they were to David Baddiel and Ant McPartlin). My original account was blocked, so now I only follow Cov accounts really,
I was doing well but I've lapsed twice in the past week, once to Ed Balls (I suggested if his team hadn't wasted so much time he might have made the train that left early) but I didn't cover myself in glory today. A WBA fan posted the word "shithole" of her photo driving past the CBS. I went for the most basic trolling on her appearance and I'm not proud of my response.
For that reason I won't be applying
I'm in! Off to share my knowledge to the University crowds. ..Ah, you're only human. How about US ambassador, standards are a bit lower for that position.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?