LarryGrayson
Member
nhs in safe hands
nhs in safe handsDoctor uses Reform conference speech to link king’s cancer to Covid vaccine
Aseem Malhotra claimed ‘eminent oncologist’ said jab was ‘significant factor in the cancer of members of royal family’www.theguardian.com
58 percent believe Farage is the man to be trusted with it so fuckin bizarrenhs in safe hands
58 percent believe Farage is the man to be trusted with it so fuckin bizarre
Nah he's more ambitious than that I think.He's controlled opposition, status quo to remain if he gets in.
A spokesperson for Cancer Research UK said: “There is no good evidence of a link between the Covid-19 vaccine and cancer risk. The vaccine is a safe and effective way to protect against the infection and prevent serious symptoms.”nhs in safe hands
wuts the medical consensus 404 page not found sounds right to meA spokesperson for Cancer Research UK said: “There is no good evidence of a link between the Covid-19 vaccine and cancer risk. The vaccine is a safe and effective way to protect against the infection and prevent serious symptoms.”
Then there is this recent Italian study of 300,000 people in Italy which shows..
View attachment 45875
Here is the paper.
Need to be careful sharing random Twitter pages with no contextA spokesperson for Cancer Research UK said: “There is no good evidence of a link between the Covid-19 vaccine and cancer risk. The vaccine is a safe and effective way to protect against the infection and prevent serious symptoms.”
Then there is this recent Italian study of 300,000 people in Italy which shows..
View attachment 45875
Here is the paper.
Ok ok, the link didn't copy right I fixed it now.wuts the medical consensus 404 page not found sounds right to me
Need to be careful sharing random Twitter pages with no context
wuts the medical consensus 404 page not found sounds right to me
And who's paying for that free childcare? It ain't actually free. Someone somewhere is getting taxed and redistributing the wealth to you.I mean, it's a good soundbite! It's just not completely true, really.
17 years ago, under a labour government, when my son was born, my missus had to leave work as it cost more to pay for childcare than what she made in wages. It was a David Cameron, Tory Government that upped the free childcare to 30 hours so when my daughter was born, she was able to go back to work and we were better off in our pocket for it.
It was also the same David Cameron government that upped the 20% ceiling from £42k a year to £50k, meaning middle wage earners could earn more before hitting the 40% tax bracket
They also upped the personal income tax from £10.5k to £12.5k, meaning low earning households can earn more before paying tax, and that people who have a low wage topped up by benefits who work part time could earn more aswell.
If i could be bothered to research it, I could probably find more, but these are issues that I know of because they all immediately affected me and my family/situation. And as a family, we were better off under that Cameron/Tory Government money wise, than the previous Labour government (which I voted for at that time).
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Greatqueen lucy is going to run for reform!!
100% not burial tombs that's for sure.Dare I ask what you believe the pyramids were really used for?
It's the stamp duty that is the issue and reason for resigning.
I don't believe having money or owning two houses is a resigning issue, as much as some people seem to have a problem with it.
Well in some ways it is.It’s not Elon musks or the owner of amazons fault that people are homeless, why should they hand out hard earned money! Socialism is just a lazy way of describing bitter jealous people
Who's saying they should give all the money up?Er cause maybe they are responsible for millions of jobs and if they give all the money up then a lot of people would be jobless. Boosh wannabe is starting to change its disappointing lad
Bloody illegal immigrants taking all the housing!What were they really used for? To house aliens?
She’s still serving her sentenceChrist almighty
Pretty rubbish conspiracy theorist who can’t even come up with a theory!100% not burial tombs that's for sure.
And the forum bellend chiefdave can put as many laughing emoji as he likes, that pricks got no answers for anything.
Well because a redistribution of wealth does not mean an equal redistribution. It means a fair and equitable one.You are forgetting that socialism wants a redistribution of the wealth, so wealth creators stop creating wealth, (because what's the point) and those who create fuck all and do fuck all, are rewarded for doing fuck all.
Then eventually all men are equally wealthy, which means we are all in the same queue at the food bank.
Fantastic idea.
Got better things to do that get involved in discussions about chemtrails, fake moon landings, how the earth is flat and whatever the fuck we're supposed to think the pyramids are for.100% not burial tombs that's for sure.
And the forum bellend chiefdave can put as many laughing emoji as he likes, that pricks got no answers for anything.
Of course somebody is paying for it. Thats how government scheme work you muppet! Trying for a gotcha because your tax bill paid my kids childcare!And who's paying for that free childcare? It ain't actually free. Someone somewhere is getting taxed and redistributing the wealth to you.
Nice to see you agree with socialist principles rather than if you chose to have kids so you should pay for it yourself.
Bet it won’t be in Northampton - she’ll be laughed out of town.queen lucy is going to run for reform!!
The Guardian article is of course a bit of a hit piece, this is a video of his speech, which I guess you will ignore.Doctor uses Reform conference speech to link king’s cancer to Covid vaccine
Aseem Malhotra claimed ‘eminent oncologist’ said jab was ‘significant factor in the cancer of members of royal family’www.theguardian.com
The Guardian article is of course a bit of a hit piece, this is a video of his speech, which I guess you will ignore.
Yeah alright Dr Evil, you’re boring mateBet it won’t be in Northampton - she’ll be laughed out of town.
Not nearly as boring as your blind admiration for a racist childminder.Yeah alright Dr Evil, you’re boring mate
I called you boring, what relevance has that got to do with her. I’m pointing out a fact about youNot nearly as boring as your blind admiration for a racist childminder.
What’s funny or wrong with that? It needs to be fixed it’s getting abused every single day
And I'm just pointing out that that's redistribution of wealth. You know, the thing capitalism doesn't want unless it's to them.Of course somebody is paying for it. Thats how government scheme work you muppet! Trying for a gotcha because your tax bill paid my kids childcare!
That is how shit works. How many people on here have taken advantage of buying their council house at a cheaper rate? How many people traded in their £150 banger for £2k in a government scheme to get old, shitty cars off the road? How many took £5k from the government to buy a new electric car? I haven't done ANY of those things, yet the taxes I pay, helped pay for all of them! Faux outrage that i paid for somebody else's car!!!! Argh, how dare they! Etc etc. Thats how the world fucking works!
All I was saying, in reply to false statements about the tories only looking after the rich, is that, no they quite clearly dont. Where they redirect that money from, isnt a concern to me. Just like the money redirected to get people driving electric cars. I dont want or need an electric car, yet I've still paid towards one.
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Think paying all the people they employ’s wages is redistribution of wealth, why should they just give money for free it’s ridiculousAnd I'm just pointing out that that's redistribution of wealth. You know, the thing capitalism doesn't want unless it's to them.
Exactly this. I don't why people can't grasp this simple fact. More often than not when people speak against wealth redistribution their argument actually supports it. They will say things like 'people should be rewarded for working hard'. That's exactly the point, people aren't being rewarded for working hard.Well because a redistribution of wealth does not mean an equal redistribution. It means a fair and equitable one.
Those that work hard deserve more than those that do not. Those that have jobs that require specialist skills or knowledge deserve more than those that do not. Those that work in hazardous or arduous conditions deserve more than those that do not. Those that work unsociable hours deserve more than those that do not. Those jobs where demand exceeds supply deserve more than those where a large number of people want a small number of jobs. And there are undoubtedly many other factors that could go into making it fairer.
I was chatting to some people earlier today who were commenting on how much more of your day is taken up with work then previously. People aren't talking about going back to how things were decades ago or some radical, never seen before, system. A lot of what people are looking for is what we had relatively recently.What is being asked is for a fairer allocation of that wealth. And that doesn't mean everyone gets the same. It means recognising the value that everyone brings. Hard work should see you get more. Can anyone work hard enough to say they deserve hundreds of thousands of times more than someone else who works? No. That is purely greed.
Many people are expected to do overtime for free. Loads of people give their time for nothing to volunteer in a number of areas and if everyone stopped doing that for one day the world would collapse.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?