They really don't like having a taste of their own medicine do they?
It's fucking funny tbf, regardless of whether this was the correct decision or not.
Just applying the same logic as your master
Agreed, I don't know how he's gotten away with it. But let's not act as though we didn't have whataboutery on this thread earlier in the week about actual violenceHe was inciting violence. He should have been found guilty as there is video evidence.
Fuck knows how he has not gone to prison considering Lucy got locked up for a tweet.
It's fucking shambolic. Makes a mockery of the system.
Totally feel for poor Lucy. If she is released and runs i would vote fo rher.He was inciting violence. He should have been found guilty as there is video evidence.
Fuck knows how he has not gone to prison considering Lucy got locked up for a tweet.
It's fucking shambolic. Makes a mockery of the system.
Stay strong hun xxTotally feel for poor Lucy. If she is released and runs i would vote fo rher.
You can’t say ‘I think it’s the wrong decision’ in typical fashion you deflect and chat complete shit to try and make yourself look edgy. You are stupid, and because you have a few friends on this forum you think your right about everything, got some news for you once you log offYou've just said the only people that think this decision is the right one are in this thread (when nobody has actually said it was the right decision).
While the people who actually made the decision, are quite literally not in this thread.
And you call other people stupid?
Ah yeah, because it’s something to point score about wanting peoples throats cut. ClownThey really don't like having a taste of their own medicine do they?
It's fucking funny tbf, regardless of whether this was the correct decision or not.
You can’t say ‘I think it’s the wrong decision’ in typical fashion you deflect and chat complete shit to try and make yourself look edgy. You are stupid, and because you have a few friends on this forum you think your right about everything, got some news for you once you log off
'They tried to set fire to people in a hotel'They really don't like having a taste of their own medicine do they?
It's fucking funny tbf, regardless of whether this was the correct decision or not.
Expected or wanted, did you want him to be found guilty? Love the way your using ‘expected’ because deep down you probably wanted him to be found not guiltyI said I expected him to be found guilty you fucking idiot.
My god you're dense.
I can just imagine what it was like...Did a good job on selecting the jury then I guess.
I dread to thinkI can just imagine what it was like...
Did a good job on selecting the jury then I guess.
A major difference is that she entered a guilty plea on a charge that can lead to several years in prison.He was inciting violence. He should have been found guilty as there is video evidence.
Fuck knows how he has not gone to prison considering Lucy got locked up for a tweet.
It's fucking shambolic. Makes a mockery of the system.
This is the thing, for all the ‘two tier Keir’ stuff that will inevitably come out of this do people think he’s out there hand picking the jury??
From what i can see of the reporting i think hes been cleared on the basis that he wasn't referring to any protestors needingtheir throats cut. He was instead referring to the peope that had left a razor blade on a train, behind a NF sticker i think. My assumption is this means he wasnt inciting the crowd to do harm to the groups protesting at the time.A major difference is that she entered a guilty plea on a charge that can lead to several years in prison.
Jones entered a not guilty plea and therefore it was down to a jury to decide.
I obviously wasn’t at the trail, or even following it particularly closely, so while the video clip on socials leaves you thinking he has to be guilty there is presumably more to it. The jury returned their verdict very quickly.
I see someone’s got their legal curiosity back!Isn’t it more the comments made encouraging the people in the Stockport aftermath to actually plead guilty - wasn’t it suggested they’d have little chance of bail and so be incarcerated for a year even before the trial took place?
From what i can see of the reporting i think hes been cleared on the basis that he wasn't referring to any protestors needingtheir throats cut. He was instead referring to the peope that had left a razor blade on a train, behind a NF sticker i think. My assumption is this means he wasnt inciting the crowd to do harm to the groups protesting at the time.
I'm not saying i necessarily agree but i think thats the basis for the decision.
Should deffo be doing a stretchson.He should probably face jail time for this hat tbh
Literally this meme:He should probably face jail time for this hat tbh
We all saw the clip, and off the back of it you would think he was guilty.We all saw it and whatever technicality he's got off with, fair play just like the footballers with driving offences etc and money clearly speaks by having the best representation. However whatever side our politics are, it's a fekkin disgrace and makes a mockery of the system. He should have plead guilty and he should be in jail. I'm surprised there wasn't any intervention to ensure that for fear of what will now likely follow with further unrest.
I hope he at least has the grace not to try and resume public office, but I guess there is no shame in some. It will also accelerate the call for judiciary panels with legal backgrounds to decide cases, rather than members of the public and it will be a huge shame for all of us when that happens.
The longer she stays inside, the larger her eventual GB News contract will beI do think it’s also time to release Lucy Connolly, she has been in prison for long enough, there’s no real further benefit in keeping her in custody.
Very surprised by the decision, and seems very unfair given other people have gone to prison (who I also think shouldn't have as I don't see the point in sending people to prison unless they are an actual threat to society).
I think they'll be very annoyed at their lawyers telling them to plead guilty when someone who hasn't has got away with it. I'm not sure if they had taken it to trial a jury would've convicted them.
I get that. If you plead guilty then there is no other option than for the judge to follow the letter of the law, even if many people think it's over the top.I think he’s a nob and he should have gone but people get Connolly plead guilty and this guy didn’t and was found innocent by a jury, right? I’m not sure what people wanted a judge to do with someone who has admitted the charge other than sentence them tbh.
Straight from watching the Premier League back into the Politics Thread... hell yeah!!Was weird how everybody around that time pled guilty though. Wonder what legal advice they got?
Was weird how everybody around that time pled guilty though. Wonder what legal advice they got?
I think he’s a nob and he should have gone but people get Connolly plead guilty and this guy didn’t and was found innocent by a jury, right? I’m not sure what people wanted a judge to do with someone who has admitted the charge other than sentence them tbh.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?