Watched a documentary on this recently. Part of the plan involves moving immigrants from 'ghettos', poor area's with a large percentage of immigrants, to more wealthy area's with low levels of immigrants. This is all funded by the goverenment.
I can imagine there would be absolute uproar if Starmer said the government were going to fund similar here.
Suspect people will only want to copy parts of the plan that involve encouraging immigrants to leave and restricting numbers coming in.
Ultimately if brits don’t want to have kids then the options are quick decline or immigration.
Not sure there's an easy answer there. Even if we magically found a 'perfect' system so much politically messaging these days is basically vibes there's every chance a Farage like character would spin it as a disaster for their own self interestThe battle with immigration is giving the public faith that our borders are controlled, arrivals are economically productive, fulfil the conditions of their visas and any criminals are deported. This isn’t ’left v right’ stuff.
Ultimately if brits don’t want to have kids then the options are quick decline or immigration.
I’d be very careful about taking anything Cummings says as gospel, like Musk he talks a good game but when given the chance cried off. The boats are a distraction, tens of thousands at most. The problems people have with immigration aren’t caused by asylum seekers, they’re just emblematic. They’re caused by the rapid demographic change they see around them caused by mass non European migration. And as non Europeans are the only fuckers fucking these days the proportion of them anywhere in the world will increase. At least until Africa and Asia become as rich as Europe and stop fucking like Europe.
Not sure there's an easy answer there. Even if we magically found a 'perfect' system so much politically messaging these days is basically vibes there's every chance a Farage like character would spin it as a disaster for their own self interest
Even if they did all that there would still be problems in society and people will want someone to blame. And for too many of them the easy answer will still be foreigners.If Labour got net migration to sub 100k p/a, tightened entry requirements, ‘stopped the boats’, deported arrivals such as; foreign criminals, people no longer meeting their visa conditions and denied asylum seekers…
… Farage and Reform would be out of business. Given Starmer’s background, he was never going to take the steps necessary to address this. No one believes Starmer when he says he’s angry about the small boat crossings.
Even if they did all that there would still be problems in society and people will want someone to blame. And for too many of them the easy answer will still be foreigners.
Of course we shouldn't do nothing.… so do nothing?
One thing that fascinates me about the liberal-left is that on immigration, there almost no limit on numbers coming into the country.
Of course we shouldn't do nothing.
Even though I'm quite left wing and libertarian some of the things I'd try to do would be considered quite draconian, especially regarding those that break the law. Though first things first, employ more people so processing happens quicker. The big thing is how do we encourage more Brits to take on the huge number of care jobs that are required to be filled by migrants?
Anyway, the point I was arguing was you saying if migration was more controlled the likes of Reform and Farage would be out of business. I really doubt that.
Apart from brexitThe electorate has consistently voted for lower migration, does their voice not matter?
Even so, the first port of call is addressing the root causes of declining fertility. How can governments make policies that support families should be top of the agenda rather than importing people.
The way you talk on this topic, it’s as if there is no cultural costs involved here. The economic costs are mounting, and crime statistics paint a bleak picture too. There’s been episodes of far away regional conflicts erupting into violence in our streets and even sectarian politicians elected to our parliament.
On the Dominic Cummings point, I actually think he’s on the money. The civil service has at times been openly resistant to government policies and on the issue of immigration specifically, the Home Office is either criminally negligent or hiding details (e.g. migrant hotels have been revised upwards 3 times the original projections) from the public. Side note on Musk, achieved some decent cost savings but his agenda was always somewhat at odds with the wider MAGA movement and his relationship with Trump showed early signs of tension.
On another tangent, those same tensions exist with Reform’s constituency. On immigration, Farage and Reform is strong but economically ill, a lot of Reform would-be voters (and 2019 Conservative voters) generally want ‘big state’ spending which goes against Reform’s Thatcherite roots. Who knows, Reform may be about to implode after today’s news.
Does it not strike you as odd that reform are saying starmer is Marxist and the most left wing prime minister ever and Corbyn and Zara and other socialists are saying he’s the most right wing labour leader everFarage was put out of business in 2017 and 2019 when a) Brexit was settled and b) Boris Johnson promised an Australian points system.
There’s an argument that Reform (Brexit Party) loaned that support, particularly in the north and midlands. Ultimately, the massive failures in immigration eroded trust in the Tories amongst people who deserted them for Reform. Amongst other things, the country were just disgusted with them.
I don’t know about you, this Labour government has a lot of similarities with the 2019 Tory government. Anyone I know who’s remotely left wing is disgusted at this government… there’s a real threat that if the Green party went all in on a left wing populist platform, they could seriously hurt Labour.
The above paragraph is caveated by the fact we’ve got 3.5 years until the next election. If anyone told you Reform would be polling at 30% by 2025 in 2020, you’d have been referred to a psychiatric ward.
I've just found out that my partner and I are entitled to £70 per month child benefit that I had no idea that we were entitled too! I'm surprised that we are entitled tbh.
Does it not strike you as odd that reform are saying starmer is Marxist and the most left wing prime minister ever and Corbyn and Zara and other socialists are saying he’s the most right wing labour leader ever
????
Does it not strike you as odd that reform are saying starmer is Marxist and the most left wing prime minister ever and Corbyn and Zara and other socialists are saying he’s the most right wing labour leader ever
????
Pretty much the same phenomenon for Rishi Sunak. He was simultaneously right wing and a ‘socialist’. It hasn’t happened yet, but my gut feeling is that Starmer will swing to the left rapidly if the Greens grow more support - their 9% is significant.
In my view, the country needs a new ‘market for ideas’ because the main parties have stuck to policies that aren’t too dissimilar.
Only the treasury could look at the balance books and conclude cutting the winter fuel allowance was a good idea. As low as my opinion is of Rachel Reeves, I don’t believe a Labour politician would think it’s a good idea to scrap this for pensioners.
You’re believing your own propaganda![]()
Comparing Sunak and unreconstructed Thatcherite with Starmer who is as soft left as you get![]()
Pensioner poverty was a Labour priority like child poverty. If they’re not in poverty they aren’t a Labour priority. The only reason to court pensioners is electoral not ideological.
As a life long socialist who has become more centre left and pragmatic as life’s challenges present themselves in reality and perception the decision to stop wfa for everyone with income of £11k or more or something like that was a massive backward step as was the inheritance tax on farmers at the level it was put at.Pretty much the same phenomenon for Rishi Sunak. He was simultaneously right wing and a ‘socialist’. It hasn’t happened yet, but my gut feeling is that Starmer will swing to the left rapidly if the Greens grow more support - their 9% is significant.
In my view, the country needs a new ‘market for ideas’ because the main parties have stuck to policies that aren’t too dissimilar.
Only the treasury could look at the balance books and conclude cutting the winter fuel allowance was a good idea. As low as my opinion is of Rachel Reeves, I don’t believe a Labour politician would think it’s a good idea to scrap this for pensioners.
Except he wasn't. He never went away. Literally the morning after the Brexit result he was on TV moaning about it and setting up his next 'the wrong brexit' grift.Farage was put out of business in 2017 and 2019
Could be interesting if Polanski wins their leadership contest. In the past you'd have said having a non-MP leader could be an issue but it never hurt Farage.It hasn’t happened yet, but my gut feeling is that Starmer will swing to the left rapidly if the Greens grow more support - their 9% is significant.
Could be interesting if Polanski wins their leadership contest. In the past you'd have said having a non-MP leader could be an issue but it never hurt Farage.
There's a large chunk of people on the left who feel politically homeless, if someone could galvanise them the way Farage can the right it might get interesting. But history indicates that's unlikely. The left seems to struggle to unite behind one figure. Just look at all the backstabbing Corbyn had to endure!
Only way you shut the likes of Farage up is to 'fix' the country. If people see their standard of living increasing, are able to access healthcare, see their elderly loved ones properly cared for the issue goes away.
Seems to be a popular theme that if you can roughly hold your % of a vote it's an overwhelming mandate for you - even though it's well under 50%.The Scottish parliament result was interesting.
Labour won and the winner spent most time in his speech saying it shows Scotland don’t want reform.
Until this election reform have made zero effort in Scotland
Labour vote declined by 2%, SNP 15% and the conservatives 11%
Reform grew by 26%
The Scottish parliament result was interesting.
Labour won and the winner spent most time in his speech saying it shows Scotland don’t want reform.
Until this election reform have made zero effort in Scotland
Labour vote declined by 2%, SNP 15% and the conservatives 11%
Reform grew by 26%
Except he wasn't. He never went away. Literally the morning after the Brexit result he was on TV moaning about it and setting up his next 'the wrong brexit' grift.
The fact is you could put a dome over the UK and not let a single person in and, as it wouldn't solve all the countries problems, you'd have the likes of Farage finding their next target. Suspect we'd first be on get all the foreigners out before they move on to first and second generation immigrants.
Only way you shut the likes of Farage up is to 'fix' the country. If people see their standard of living increasing, are able to access healthcare, see their elderly loved ones properly cared for the issue goes away.
Its not a coincidence that the popularity of people like Farage increases in times of economic hardship.
Can’t believe 1 in 3 of our friends and colleagues are such sheep
Oh no Labour won with a 2% drop as the incumbent government despite being the worst government ever, in a 40% turn out by-election.
What a shameful result, Starmer must resign.
This wasn’t an election to a UK parliament.
The discussion was trying to analyse sensibly the result and then the Village Retard steps in with a typically pointless contribution.
And the village c**t steps in with a typically classless contribution. Fuck off with the R word.