I think there are more considerations to take into account than whatever tariff number Trump has plucked out of the air this morning. (But I’m sure these latest tariffs are for real this time, pinky promise)
I think there are more considerations to take into account than whatever tariff number Trump has plucked out of the air this morning. (But I’m sure these latest tariffs are for real this time, pinky promise)Really?
Is it better to have a potential 50% tariff or a 10% one.
Take your time….
16% achieved
Sorry, don’t understand that. Is this a concocted Labour logic?It's only either of those things if you are incapable of the most basic critical thinking
£250bn? Stop buying stuff you greedy consumerist fuck wits
£250bn? Stop buying stuff you greedy consumerist fuck wits
Just had a look and my parents bought a 4 bed house with an acre of land in 1999 for £175k.
That's 330k in today's money.
They don't live there anymore but that house would probably cost minimum 800k if it was on the market today, while 330k gets you a 3 bed semi.
But but Netflix and avocados and iphones.
You can get a nice house in the best areas of Cov for £330k.
It could get you 2 or maybe 3 flats / terraces in the not so nice areas.
Is it better to have an extra £100B in trade every year or not?Really?
Is it better to have a potential 50% tariff or a 10% one.
Take your time….
Can you link some?
Which ones?Can you link some?
Isn't the point PVA was making that his parents house, which cost in todays money £330K, would now cost £800K plus? Not that its impossible to buy a house for £330K
We all did quite badly iirc.Yeah was a different one on the FT I think.
Do you need an £800k house?Yes exactly that!
Is it better to have an extra £100B in trade every year or not?
In terms of economics (which is what your question is really about) you’d take the 50% tariff everyday vs not loosing the £100b in trade with the EU.
Here is one to start with, very similar to my parents house ( cheaper as not in Coventry).Can you link some?
Do you need an £800k house?
Are you surprisedMissing the point again.
I think the point is the rise in house prices relative to wages, which isn’t a shocking conceptSo the point is something has increased in value?
I think the point is the rise in house prices relative to wages, which isn’t a shocking concept
Yes.Are you really sure about that?
Do you need an £800k house?
Are you sure this is a game that, as a pensioner, you want to play?Do you need an £800k house?
That’s what I assumeWell that says $250m but he did mean billion.
My dad worked at a Ford foundry and was able to buy a house in the mid 90s on just his wages that would be worth about that figure today. No one doing a similar job today could afford to buy anything close to that. If you can't understand or accept that point, anything you post on the subject is a waste of time.
Is it? If you don’t need a house and land of that size, asking if you need a house of that price is hardly missing the point. Doesn’t suit your agenda though, does it?Missing the point again.
Is it? If you don’t need a house and land of that size, asking if you need a house of that price is hardly missing the point. Doesn’t suit your agenda though, does it?
Endowment schemeIt was corrupted ages ago, creative accounting, Interest only, that scheme that evades me, something to do with de something to do with pension plan that went south,.
We've had all that growth but where has it got us, to a worse environment but at Equality, and now well.
Still missing it.
It's not whether anyone needs it. I don't think anyone needs an acre of land, but we'd all like it. The point is that it's about 5 times more expensive relative to wages now (for any house, not just one with loads of land).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?