Sick Boy
Super Moderator
It's mostly a continuation of the current deal with minimal changes - not sure there's much to see.
It's mostly a continuation of the current deal with minimal changes - not sure there's much to see.Starmer is just a clown
He makes grandiose comments about a deal with Europe to put us on tbe global stage
Last week he was mimicking Enoch Powell with his “Island of Strangers” nonsense.
What an embarrassment he is
@PVA is impressed
God you're so fucking tedious.
As said, it's minor changes but a step in the right direction.
Nobody is claiming it to be a game changer, you're pretending that's what people are saying so you can get angry about it.
I’ll ask again what benefits does it offer?
If only the information was widely available.
It's mostly a continuation of the current deal with minimal changes - not sure there's much to see.
One must smirk though at “equality Labour” now putting discrimination policies in place based on age, origin etc.
God help us if soAlthough I have scoffed at the idea I do think we are edging closer to a Reform government
Read my posts.So you want freedom of movement for the entire planet? Or you want the same visa rules for every country? Do you even know what you want?
God help us if so
Funny seeing the headbangers losing their fucking minds over some fish again.
(while actual fishing organisations come out and say this is a good thing.)
Read my posts.
Equality is key. Immigration should be about who you are, not where you are from. Same rules for all.
Is that a problem?
YesSo you want us to treat people from North Korea the same as the USA?
They have exchanged prisoners before. This is nothing new.Is that from today because Russia and Ukraine started talks 3 days ago and have already agreed to a prisoner exchange
Please, please, pleaseShe will be appalled.
Austerity against big pharma is a different thing.
Big pharmaceutical. Big banking. Insurance scams. Expose the lot
Musk went in and slashed the overheads and wasted spending. People says it would fall over.
It also shows the economic reality of what can happen when a smaller trading bloc tries to renegotiate terms with a bigger one.the fact that WE have to maintain THEIR standards of food production (bloody cheek - most of what is required in the EU was framed by OUR practices) and that any disputes will be decided upon by the ECJ really undermines the democratic decision that this country made.
It also shows the economic reality of what can happen when a smaller trading bloc tries to renegotiate terms with a bigger one.
So, Trump went on to speak with the PM’s of France, Italy, Germany……
Not Starmer.
Why?
The creation of low emissions zones is driven by central government. London led the way most likely because it already had the mayor and the infrastructure to be able to do it. The evidence of pollution related health problems is clear. I genuinely cannot understand why a LEZ in London is a problem for you.Because he is an arse and other cities seem to like copying his initiatives.
We've traditionally had much higher standards of animal welfare, food processing and production standards, and border controls because we are an island with a huge dependency on maintenance of our agricultural economy (all of which feed into "keeping the bugs out"). They have taken those standards, photocopied them onto European Commission headed paper and told us that we have to abide by them. It's exactly the same picture with health & safety legislation, which we are now having to re-write so that we don't have to comply with any "gold-plating" that the EU wish to apply.Weird how all their standards are shaped by us tho. How did that happen when we were in the cuck chair with the vibrating buttplug or whatever the approved analogy is these days?
A LEZ in London isn’t necessarily a problem to me, but if it was it isn’t really something you need to understand. It’s the potential for proliferation of such Khan initiatives that worry me. Presumably as EV adoption increases they should fall by the wayside. I won’t hold my breath.The creation of low emissions zones is driven by central government. London led the way most likely because it already had the mayor and the infrastructure to be able to do it. The evidence of pollution related health problems is clear. I genuinely cannot understand why a LEZ in London is a problem for you.
We also need to be realistic though. The EU represents 75%+ of the UK food and drink exports (USA, China and Singapore the rest and it's probably whisky which is most likely not even subject to the deal) and 90%+ imports. Why would you not match standards in that context?I have to say i was very undecided about which way to vote on Brexit, and i was not against freedom of movement for economically active people who allow our economy to grow (e.g. people from Eastern Europe who work hard, even for below minimum wage, in sectors where Brits are too lazy to, such as social care, hospitality and food production), who we are now missing terribly.
However, I wanted our country to be free from the jurisdiction of federal courts and to set our own laws (but admittedly, the deal we ended up with has caused a bureaucratic nightmare). I think the deal Starmer has done on export of food is positive for farmers and exporters, but the fact that WE have to maintain THEIR standards of food production (bloody cheek - most of what is required in the EU was framed by OUR practices) and that any disputes will be decided upon by the ECJ really undermines the democratic decision that this country made.
Any evidence of a reduction in pollution related health problems?
I remember a BBC interview where I was asked if there were any regrets about leaving the EU. I got a bit of backlash about the response.I have to say i was very undecided about which way to vote on Brexit, and i was not against freedom of movement for economically active people who allow our economy to grow (e.g. people from Eastern Europe who work hard, even for below minimum wage, in sectors where Brits are too lazy to, such as social care, hospitality and food production), who we are now missing terribly.
However, I wanted our country to be free from the jurisdiction of federal courts and to set our own laws (but admittedly, the deal we ended up with has caused a bureaucratic nightmare). I think the deal Starmer has done on export of food is positive for farmers and exporters, but the fact that WE have to maintain THEIR standards of food production (bloody cheek - most of what is required in the EU was framed by OUR practices) and that any disputes will be decided upon by the ECJ really undermines the democratic decision that this country made.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?