It's not simple - in fact it's quite complicated.
What is actual facts, what is hearsay, what was the original conditions, what changed, who is SISU (not Elliot), who was/is actually in charge .... it's very complicated.
Bottom line is we are where we are. Nobody knows if we would have been better off had we not sold Dann/Fox but instead loaned 4 million in the bank at 750K interest per year. You could say ... we have investors, they should have increased their investments ... but then you ask them to be suggar daddys, right?
I only have to look at our neighbors to see how uncertain it is to invest heavily in players. Look at their table position - is it much better than ours?