Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Director of Football (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter TrueSkyBlueLiam
  • Start date Apr 18, 2016
Forums New posts

TrueSkyBlueLiam

Member
  • Apr 18, 2016
  • #1
It's a controversial issue, but it's a lot more common these days for clubs to appoint a Director of Football, whilst deciding to employ a Head Coach rather than a manager. If used correctly a DoF can be very effective, but as we've seen over the past few years, they can also be detrimental to a club's chances of success. So whats your view on the role of Director of Football? Does it bring much needed assistance to a club and it's manager or just get in the way? Drop your opinions below and the best answers will be read out on Thursday's episode of Sports Lounge, live from 10am on 98.6 Hillz FM
 
H

Huckerby

Guest
  • Apr 18, 2016
  • #2
Up to the manager I reckon. Some may prefer it some may not.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 18, 2016
  • #3
If you've got a young manager and an experienced DoF it can work, obviously as long as they get on.

With the high turnover of managers I wouldn't be supposed to see more clubs adopt the model of American sports. Have a DoF or GM who signs players, managers, coaches and a head coach who is purely responsible for working with the players supplied.

Would remove the issue of having to rebuild every few months when a new manager comes in.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 18, 2016
  • #4
Depends on who the director of football is get one like Chelsea's one no thanks but equally there are some good ones.

In some clubs it could be a waste of budget.
 

oucho

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 18, 2016
  • #5
Where has it really worked? Can't think of any examples.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 18, 2016
  • #6
A large reason why DOF are popular is so you have a continuity and a long term philosophy in place irrelevant of manager, it means when the head coach moves on you just bring in the next one to fill the gap instead of ripping everything up and starting from scratch everytime a manager is replaced.

Personally I think they can be good provided you get the right man, if you get the wrong man they can be destructive.
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 18, 2016
  • #7
The manager has to be the only one who decides what players are signed, sometimes had no choice who goes if cash is needed
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 18, 2016
  • #8
oucho said:
Where has it really worked? Can't think of any examples.
Click to expand...

I thought you were very keen on Andy Thorn being director of football?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 18, 2016
  • #9
What's the difference between a technical director and a director of football?
 

TrueSkyBlueLiam

Member
  • Apr 19, 2016
  • #10
oucho said:
Where has it really worked? Can't think of any examples.
Click to expand...
I cant think of any off the top of my head but im sure its worked out somewhere
 

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 19, 2016
  • #11
oucho said:
Where has it really worked? Can't think of any examples.
Click to expand...


See the man Tottenham signed from Southampton to be their Director of football/head of recruitment - not worked out badly at all.

As for CCFC yes if it the right person but there're too few and far between. Ray Ranson was good and if you belive the press we missed out on Henderson on a perm deal as SISU did not back him.

But look where Dann, Gunner and Fox are now compared to CCFC?
 

TrueSkyBlueLiam

Member
  • Apr 21, 2016
  • #12
Any more answers lads? The game has now started
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 21, 2016
  • #13
skybluetony176 said:
What's the difference between a technical director and a director of football?
Click to expand...

Probably a technicality.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 21, 2016
  • #14
Hobo said:
Probably a technicality.
Click to expand...

Yeah I'm struggling to see the difference. For all intents and purposes as far as I can tell MV would be doing the same job if his title was director of football.

It's down to the manager as far as I'm concerned. If he feels that it's a void that he doesn't want to take but needs filling then a director of football / technical director is the way to go.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?