Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Depth (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Tea & Busquets
  • Start date Sep 8, 2023
Forums New posts

Tea & Busquets

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #1
Joint lowest first team squad size in the league. Doesn’t help that we’re not giving many youngsters chances. Curious how Robins will fix this.
 
Reactions: Alan Dugdales Moustache
N

napolimp

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #2
It's not the size that matters.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849, SkyBlueMatt, Astute and 2 others

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #3
Well he obviously wanted a couple more. Only time will tell and injuries if and when we get them will dictate.

Although we are a couple down on last year I think there is more flexibility and options within the current squad.

Last year we were blighted not just with injuries but most of them involved lengthy recovery times.

I think what slowed recruitment this summer is we were focused on permanent deal rather than than the quick fix season long loan. Which should put us in a better place next summer.
 
Reactions: Bernie Rhodes Nose, skybluepm2 and zuni

slowpoke

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #4
It is a bit of fingers crossed on injuries, as said above we had a lot of long term injuries at the same time which didn’t help.
Difference this season come January Robins will be able to bring players in loan or permanent if needed, last January he wasn’t allowed , just Maguire wasn’t it ?
 
Reactions: ccfc1234 and Martin180
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #5
Our depth up front seems like the biggest problem. I doubt we can maintain a two-striker system with Wright, Simms, Godden and Tavares, considering the injury records of the latter two. We seem to be inviting a change to a lone striker formation, which seems a waste when you’ve invested so much in getting Wright and Simms to play together.
 
Reactions: Terry_dactyl
K

Kilclines curly mullet

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #6
Chill

We have so much more quality across the squad than last season.

The likes of Kane / Walker / Dabo / Waghorn / Taveres / Ohare made the squad larger in numbers last year but between all 6 contributed next to nothing

Top 10 finish this season and then go again next summer and I’ll be chuffed
 
Reactions: hamertime, Bernie Rhodes Nose, Wiseoldfool and 11 others

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #7
slowpoke said:
It is a bit of fingers crossed on injuries, as said above we had a lot of long term injuries at the same time which didn’t help.
Difference this season come January Robins will be able to bring players in loan or permanent if needed, last January he wasn’t allowed , just Maguire wasn’t it ?
Click to expand...

No he brought in McNally, Norton-cuffy and wilson-esbrand.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 9744, CovBrummie94 and Terry_dactyl

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #8
SBT said:
Our depth up front seems like the biggest problem. I doubt we can maintain a two-striker system with Wright, Simms, Godden and Tavares, considering the injury records of the latter two. We seem to be inviting a change to a lone striker formation, which seems a waste when you’ve invested so much in getting Wright and Simms to play together.
Click to expand...

Eh?

If wright and/or Simms are injured in your scenario why is it a waste any more than if we had a fourth striker?

Well just got to the box like normal.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #9
shmmeee said:
Eh?

If wright and/or Simms are injured in your scenario why is it a waste any more than if we had a fourth striker?

Well just got to the box like normal.
Click to expand...
Well it’s a waste if we have to spend time and energy working on a different system just because we don’t have a fourth striker capable of slotting into the system we’ve spent all summer (and >£10 million in new forwards) on shifting to.

Even without injuries, it’s asking a lot to rebuild the formation around two expensive new strikers and then only have one real option to rotate in and out.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #10
SBT said:
Well it’s a waste if we have to spend time and energy working on a different system just because we don’t have a fourth striker capable of slotting into the system we’ve spent all summer (and >£10 million in new forwards) on shifting to.

Even without injuries, it’s asking a lot to rebuild the formation around two expensive new strikers and then only have one real option to rotate in and out.
Click to expand...

We’ve switched between 3412 and 3421 quite a lot over the last few years. I’m not sure it would be a massive imposition. Of course if we lost two of our top three strikers it wouldn’t be ideal, but I’m not sure what area of the pitch that doesn’t apply to.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #11
shmmeee said:
We’ve switched between 3412 and 3421 quite a lot over the last few years. I’m not sure it would be a massive imposition. Of course if we lost two of our top three strikers it wouldn’t be ideal, but I’m not sure what area of the pitch that doesn’t apply to.
Click to expand...
Well we’d only need one of our three strikers to get injured, and then you’re making it very hard to play 90 minutes every week with two up front.

Assuming that playing with two strikers is our best formation, that’s a problem. And if playing with one striker turns out to be our best formation, that’s a different kind of problem.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #12
SBT said:
Well we’d only need one of our three strikers to get injured, and then you’re making it very hard to play 90 minutes every week with two up front.

Assuming that playing with two strikers is our best formation, that’s a problem. And if playing with one striker turns out to be our best formation, that’s a different kind of problem.
Click to expand...

Why? Players all over the pitch play 90 mins. It’s not ideal but Vik pretty much did it the whole season last year.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #13
shmmeee said:
Why? Players all over the pitch play 90 mins. It’s not ideal but Vik pretty much did it the whole season last year.
Click to expand...
Vik was unusually resilient and you’re asking two different players to repeat the trick - it’s definitely not ideal.
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #14
Telegraph reporting that our squad is 22.
But they have missed Kitching off the list which makes 23 by my reckoning.
 
Reactions: covcity4life

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #15
10 feet down the deep end. Viveash had been spotted trying to hold his breath for over a minute down Kavos.
 
Reactions: wingy and fernandopartridge

edgy

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #16
hill83 said:
10 feet down the deep end. Viveash had been spotted trying to hold his breath for over a minute down Kavos.
Click to expand...
After a balloon.
 
Reactions: wingy and hill83

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #17
SBT said:
Vik was unusually resilient and you’re asking two different players to repeat the trick - it’s definitely not ideal.
Click to expand...

Sure but I’d be more worried about losing a CM or a WB, even an AM right now. Imagine relying on Eccles and Kelly in the middle for an extended period.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #18
As others have said, last year our depth was the likes of Waghorn, Kane and Walker. If it gets to that point we'd probably do as well to run down the local park and hand out a few short term contracts.
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #19
As many have already pointed out, the quality we now have on the bench is something we haven’t seen at City for many many years, remember ‘we used to think Robins was averse to changing things due to his reluctance to use his substitutes, he’s showing no such reluctance so far this season.
In fact I think the 3 changes he made in one go at Leicester probably cost us a point.
 
Reactions: San Francisco

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #20
Tea & Busquets said:
Joint lowest first team squad size in the league. Doesn’t help that we’re not giving many youngsters chances. Curious how Robins will fix this.
Click to expand...
Is that the entire football league or our current league ?
 

Tea & Busquets

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 8, 2023
  • #21
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
Is that the entire football league or our current league ?
Click to expand...
Champo but I'm sure we're down there in the EFL.
 

slowpoke

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 9, 2023
  • #22
A number of our squad are okay in different positions so it’s fingers crossed we don’t get an extensive injury list, we can add more January.
Tea & Busquets said:
Joint lowest first team squad size in the league. Doesn’t help that we’re not giving many youngsters chances. Curious how Robins will fix this.
Click to expand...
They will get their chance when they show they are good enough.
 

Greggs

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2023
  • #23
Great to see we've finally got a massive squad and that the subs we make really change the game.........
 
Reactions: Matt smith

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2023
  • #24
Greggs said:
Great to see we've finally got a massive squad and that the subs we make really change the game.........
Click to expand...

Not sure you can argue the subs didn’t change the game last night…
 
O

oscillatewildly

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2023
  • #25
That's right - It's the length of the contract.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?