Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Dear Sky Blue Trust (3 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 5849
  • Start date Jul 17, 2014
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #106
What happens if a Trust member goes to a game? What happens if a trust member who goes to games goes to a meeting or anything?

Yes as a "policy" does that mean it will be frowned upon by the Trust? That would be a good way to alienate members wouldn't it?

Do you only get a vote on this if you go to the meeting also?
 
D

DaleM

New Member
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #107
Nick said:
What happens if a Trust member goes to a game? What happens if a trust member who goes to games goes to a meeting or anything?

Yes as a "policy" does that mean it will be frowned upon by the Trust? That would be a good way to alienate members wouldn't it?

Do you only get a vote on this if you go to the meeting also?
Click to expand...

You would get called a Scab
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #108
Nick said:
Do you only get a vote on this if you go to the meeting also?
Click to expand...

You can vote by proxy. Think details were in one of the Trust emails.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #109
DaleM said:
You would get called a Scab
Click to expand...

That wouldn't be too bad, as long as it wasn't by some old fella in a scraggy Ellesse jumper, rocking a mullet.
 
D

DaleM

New Member
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #110
Nick said:
That wouldn't be too bad, as long as it wasn't by some old fella in a scraggy Ellesse jumper, rocking a mullet.
Click to expand...


Nah probably your fat bald old uncle and his mates :facepalm:
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #111
I don't go to Sixfields but would withdraw my membership of the trust if this was passed. One membership would not make a difference I'm sure but I could not support a regime that tried to marginalise people.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #112
DaleM said:
Nah probably your fat bald old uncle and his mates :facepalm:
Click to expand...

Yeah George is a bit of a legend so I would probably be a bit gutted then!
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #113
Deleted member 5849 said:
You can vote by proxy. Think details were in one of the Trust emails.
Click to expand...

Sky Blue Trust email said:
If however you can’t attend the meeting but still want your opinions to be registered you can vote on the items being considered at the meeting by appointing a proxy to do this on your behalf. A proxy does not have to be a Trust member but would have to attend the meeting. No one person can act as proxy for more than three people, apart from the Chair, who can exercise an unlimited number of proxies. If you wish to appoint a proxy please do so using the form on the website and send it to The Trust at its registered office C/O Sapphire Group Ltd, 21 Harrowbrook Road, Harrowbrook Industrial Estate, Hinckley LE10 3DJ
Click to expand...

 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #114
Not exactly easy then.
 
L

lamtara2006

Member
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #115
oldskyblue58 said:
Just to be clear I do not think anyone should support the owners in their movement of the team to Sixfields. It is not about NOPM it is just simply wrong and I will never go there.

You can see it as a policy but if it is adopted then rightly members of the Trust will expect it to be acted upon. That will mean actions not words so is it just a policy? Will it really be just up to the Trust Board to deal with it? I have real reservations as to where this will all lead and how much pressure on SISU it will achieve but accept if approved then that is members wishes

One thing I have learnt about members groups is that there are plenty with an opinion or criticism but very very few who act and even less that achieve. But we shall see wont we

Questions

-Does the motion proposed stand or fall on its entirety? It would seem to as it is a single motion with no mention of taking the elements separately. So does it mean to vote for part of it you have to vote for all of it ?

- Part one refers to a complete supporters boycott of city matches at Sixfields - surely that must mean no one travels there not just no one goes in , it must mean also no one stands on the hill? Is that the intention?
Click to expand...

I think it stands or falls in it's entirety as worded. Of course, it could always be brought back to another meeting (EGM) to be voted on as separate measures. The Secretary would have to tell us whether amendments - eg. dropping one section -can be accepted at the meeting.

I didn't read it as anything other than not going in the ground. Bruce will have to clarify his intentions on Monday.

Agree with your thoughts on the principle of not going into Sixfields being the more important point - although I am sure that the low attendances DO have an effect on Sisu/Otium's thinking.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #116
Nothing unusual here.

The civil servants were on strike last week.
Funny that some of the ones that voted to go on strike actually went into work and some that voted not to go on strike did?
Strange but hey that's the way it goes.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #117
Will this policy apply to all supporters or just Trust Members? will trust members be discouraged from travelling to Sixfields fill stop or is it acceptable to make the 70 mile round trip if you stand on the hill?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #118
Deleted member 5849 said:
Let's try another angle.

What does the trust gain by adopting this resolution?

Conversely, what does it lose?
Click to expand...

The former players association will not go to Sixfields.. that was reiterated in a speech at Broadgate last week.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #119
Jack Griffin said:
The former players association will not go to Sixfields.. that was reiterated in a speech at Broadgate last week.
Click to expand...

And how does the trust adopting or not this resolution affect this?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 19, 2014
  • #120
Jack Griffin said:
The former players association will not go to Sixfields.. that was reiterated in a speech at Broadgate last week.
Click to expand...

Which has zilch to do with the point made by NW
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?