I dont think there was any need to indicate a location in the statement. It doesn't follow that the location of the IP is the physical location of hacker
However the Trust would still have a duty of care to its members to indicate that the site had come under attack and reassure that no breach had occurred.
If no breach has happened then my understanding is that it is not necessary to report to the ICO, but that doesn't mean they should not. Hacking or attempting to hack a site is as i understand it a criminal offence and the ICO advice is to report it to the police
That is my concern, they've pitched up to the registered address which is unlikely to be where SISU operate from. Look at how many companies are registered to that addresses which a simple google tells you is an office services company.Well I assume they went to 96 High St Kensington London W8 4SG
But if you have a site operating on open source software these 'attacks' happen on a daily basis. Hard to believe this is the only time anything has flagged up on the trust site so, given that they say nothing was compromised, why the need to make a fuss about it.However the Trust would still have a duty of care to its members to indicate that the site had come under attack and reassure that no breach had occurred.
That is my concern, they've pitched up to the registered address which is unlikely to be where SISU operate from. Look at how many companies are registered to that addresses which a simple google tells you is an office services company.
They've then moaned that nobody from SISU is there to greet them and refuse to confirm that SISU were informed in advance as the council and Wasps clearly were.
My company is registered in Cambridgeshire, I've never even visited the town its registered at let alone have an office there. If anyone wants to speak to me turning up there is not the brightest idea.
picked up "over the last few days", which to me implies more than one attempt from the same source. Just because a system in place picks something up doesn't mean there wasn't an attempted hack does it? I would assume whoever does handle their IT recognises the difference between hacking events over a number of days and normal server log activity. But you are the computer specialist not me so you understand these things better
What is 'operate from' classed as? Because it seems to have been taken by the trust as Sepalla being sat there at a desk everyday yet the only people who have responded to queries have said there is nothing to indicate they are actually physically located there and the trust have to date refused to confirm they informed SISU in advance of their visit.except the Financial Conduct Authority says it is where they operate from
I dont think there was any need to indicate a location in the statement. It doesn't follow that the location of the IP is the physical location of hacker
However the Trust would still have a duty of care to its members to indicate that the site had come under attack and reassure that no breach had occurred.
If no breach has happened then my understanding is that it is not necessary to report to the ICO, but that doesn't mean they should not. Hacking or attempting to hack a site is as i understand it a criminal offence and the ICO advice is to report it to the police
Not only highlight a location but then retweet things suggesting it's sisu. They're going beyond parody.
He can celebrate the George Eliot anniversary in peace, then!it looks like SISU Capital have bought back and cancelled 59006 of the issued share capital, which is exactly the number of shares Dermott Coleman owns(ed). A parting of the ways?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?