oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
As it stands just how much do we think the club have saved on the wages compared to last year. Here is my stab at it (I have assumed no more signings to come)
Carsley say £8k pw £416000
King £10K pw £520000
Westwood £6kpw £ 312000
Gunnarson £5K pw £260000
Doyle £5K pw £260000
Ohalorran £2k pw £104000
McIndoe £5Kpw £260000
Ward Loan £25000
Quirke £1K pw £52000
Ranson £300000
Commercial manager £50000
Employers NI £326000 (at 12.8%)
Total £2873000
new spent
Murphy £6K (£312000)
Dunn £2K (£104000)
Net saved £2.4m
plus interest saved now RR debt pd off 300000
Total £2.7m
I reckon at the moment they have knocked £225K off the losses each month. This will reduce the cash flow requirement each month
Of the £7.3m (£610K pm)loss before player sales in the last accounts there was £2.1m in player contract amortisation (£175K pm). This does not require cash funds.
Cash flow requirement is not the same as losses but roughly speaking SISU do not need to fund the amortisation charge and have saved on the wage bill so losses £610K less wages saved £225K less amortisation (no cash involved) £175 gives an approximate cash flow reqirement of £210K pm. Or put another way around an additional 5000 paying customers on the average gate.
The financial pressures are still there of course but I wonder as it stands right now is it as bad as is being made out and is the above scenario why SISU are not jumping at the chance to go (aside from the fact they dont think the offer is good enough)
Carsley say £8k pw £416000
King £10K pw £520000
Westwood £6kpw £ 312000
Gunnarson £5K pw £260000
Doyle £5K pw £260000
Ohalorran £2k pw £104000
McIndoe £5Kpw £260000
Ward Loan £25000
Quirke £1K pw £52000
Ranson £300000
Commercial manager £50000
Employers NI £326000 (at 12.8%)
Total £2873000
new spent
Murphy £6K (£312000)
Dunn £2K (£104000)
Net saved £2.4m
plus interest saved now RR debt pd off 300000
Total £2.7m
I reckon at the moment they have knocked £225K off the losses each month. This will reduce the cash flow requirement each month
Of the £7.3m (£610K pm)loss before player sales in the last accounts there was £2.1m in player contract amortisation (£175K pm). This does not require cash funds.
Cash flow requirement is not the same as losses but roughly speaking SISU do not need to fund the amortisation charge and have saved on the wage bill so losses £610K less wages saved £225K less amortisation (no cash involved) £175 gives an approximate cash flow reqirement of £210K pm. Or put another way around an additional 5000 paying customers on the average gate.
The financial pressures are still there of course but I wonder as it stands right now is it as bad as is being made out and is the above scenario why SISU are not jumping at the chance to go (aside from the fact they dont think the offer is good enough)
Last edited: