Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

CT interview with ACL chairman (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter SimonGilbert
  • Start date Feb 26, 2014
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Feb 26, 2014
  • #71
lordsummerisle said:
He's not the most popular fella up in Scotland!

Nobody at the council ever seems to do any cursory research intp people or organisations.

Which explains why Sisu were their preferred bidder for the club I suppose.

Seems to have a lot in common with another Robinson once involved with a football club.

http://www.scotzine.com/2013/06/chris-robinson-led-hearts-hand-in-hand-to-the-devils-door/
Click to expand...

Good job his new employers have moved on from football if that's his past track record!
 

skybluefred

New Member
  • Feb 26, 2014
  • #72
RoboCCFC90 said:
Like Coun Lucas said recently they have moved on from the dispute with CCFC so move on and do it quietly would be my advice, because bringing up CCFC every single statement doesn't look like moving on especially when you add that the door is still open..

I suppose Joy Seppala's statement that said "We will only return as owners" means nothing at all then?
Click to expand...

Absolutely correct--they mean nothing what so ever.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2014
  • #73
Robinson...now why does that name set alarm bells ringing? Any relation I wonder?


PUSB
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2014
  • #74
quick thought. Instead of trying to get the Bees up a a huge arena like the ricoh, would there not be any mileage in moving the Bees to the Butts, and looking at using the Ricoh for Coventry Rugby ?
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2014
  • #75
ccfcway said:
quick thought. Instead of trying to get the Bees up a a huge arena like the ricoh, w!ould there not be any mileage in moving the Bees to the Butts, and looking at using the Ricoh for Coventry Rugby ?
Click to expand...
Probably noise issues greater for Earlsdon area than Holbrooks.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2014
  • #76
wingy said:
Probably noise issues greater for Earlsdon area than Holbrooks.
Click to expand...

good shout
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #77
hill83 said:
Whilst it may be true that the Ricoh Arena will be fine without the club, isn't that a huge fuck you to the fans?
Not the best way to start your reign really is it. A bit smug.
Click to expand...

exactly.

acl scummer
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #78
covcity4life said:
exactly.

acl scummer
Click to expand...

Is he scum or just a sensible business man looking after his business?

City were not chucked out,they left on there own accord remember?

You should channel all your frustration on tim fisher to bring us home. He stole our club,nobody else.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #79
If you owned the Ricoh business what would you do?

a. Continue to wait for CCFC to return even though they are planning to build a new stadium and have shown no intention to return after 12 months away.

b. Look at other business possibilities like expanding other areas of the business ie corporate, hotels etc and looking at other possibilities for the stadium.

Please answer as if its your money, not as a Coventry fan.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #80
italiahorse said:
If you owned the Ricoh business what would you do?

a. Continue to wait for CCFC to return even though they are planning to build a new stadium and have shown no intention to return after 12 months away.

b. Look at other business possibilities like expanding other areas of the business ie corporate, hotels etc and looking at other possibilities for the stadium.

Please answer as if its your money, not as a Coventry fan.
Click to expand...

I would start negotiations with a business that clearly would secure the Ricoh and close the door in CCFC.

At the same time I would privately and public ally put a take it or leave it offer to CCFC.

With a deadline if the deadline comes and their is no movement from SISU I would move on.

However I have no doubt if the alternative is a realist one SISU will come running.
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #81
italiahorse said:
If you owned the Ricoh business what would you do?

a. Continue to wait for CCFC to return even though they are planning to build a new stadium and have shown no intention to return after 12 months away.

b. Look at other business possibilities like expanding other areas of the business ie corporate, hotels etc and looking at other possibilities for the stadium.

Please answer as if its your money, not as a Coventry fan.
Click to expand...

Option b) that is what I said earlier in the thread, but of course it was wrong, however if ACL and CCC want to move on then they really should and just forget CCFC, there is only so much you can offer one party.
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #82
dongonzalos said:
I would start negotiations with a business that clearly would secure the Ricoh and close the door in CCFC.

At the same time I would privately and public ally put a take it or leave it offer to CCFC.

With a deadline if the deadline comes and their is no movement from SISU I would move on.

However I have no doubt if the alternative is a realist one SISU will come running.
Click to expand...

ACL cannot resolve the situation - nothing they can offer will bring back the Club.

The only way to bring back the Club to the Ricoh is an agreement to sell the shares in ACL to SBS&L.
Add to that a new long lease (99yr) in Exchange for the £14m ccc loan.
 
D

Davs

New Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #83
Lets face it, it really is time one or other party actually DID something.

I am sick of all this posturing:

"We're building a new stadium"

"We're moving on"

It is all bollocks on both sides. SISU know that the Ricoh is the only viable option [other than a permanent move to Northampton]

CCC/ACL know that the only viable option for the Ricoh is a return by CCFC, or major investment to alter the main thrust of the business. The idea that Cov Rugby or the speedway would make reasonable tenents is ridiculous.

So for either party the only "moving on" options are massively expensive and time consuming.

Because of this both sides are very wary about calling the others bluff, after all talk is cheap, but actually handing out some cash is very different.
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #84
Davs said:
Lets face it, it really is time one or other party actually DID something.

I am sick of all this posturing:

"We're building a new stadium"

"We're moving on"

It is all bollocks on both sides. SISU know that the Ricoh is the only viable option [other than a permanent move to Northampton]

CCC/ACL know that the only viable option for the Ricoh is a return by CCFC, or major investment to alter the main thrust of the business. The idea that Cov Rugby or the speedway would make reasonable tenents is ridiculous.

So for either party the only "moving on" options are massively expensive and time consuming.

Because of this both sides are very wary about calling the others bluff, after all talk is cheap, but actually handing out some cash is very different.
Click to expand...

Exactly I couldn't agree more this a huge game of Chess and the Club and the Ricoh are pieces in the game, in affect I'd like to see more people like Chris Robinson brought in to either side for fresh faces and ideas in negotiations and see if a compromise can be met, other than that if ACL/CCC can survive without CCFC and continue to come out and state that they've moved on from the row with CCFC, then close the door of opportunity and look at other porspects and let the Club build the Stadium they're willing to build.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #85
Godiva said:
ACL cannot resolve the situation - nothing they can offer will bring back the Club.

The only way to bring back the Club to the Ricoh is an agreement to sell the shares in ACL to SBS&L.
Add to that a new long lease (99yr) in Exchange for the £14m ccc loan.
Click to expand...

So u think if SISU saw a viable option about to sign up at the Ricoh on a long term deal.
They would choose to borrow 30 million and build a new stadium?
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #86
dongonzalos said:
So u think if SISU saw a viable option about to sign up at the Ricoh on a long term deal.
They would choose to borrow 30 million and build a new stadium?
Click to expand...

I think if they were offered to buy the shares in ACL at a fair Price they would take it.
Higgs probably would be happy to sell their 50% - it's all up to CCC to offer their 50%.

All the nonesense about how everybody have moved on ... well, they have all moved to the position where the choice is either sell ACL to SBS&L or don't.
 

squeeam

Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #87
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #88
valiant15 said:
Is he scum or just a sensible business man looking after his business?

City were not chucked out,they left on there own accord remember?

You should channel all your frustration on tim fisher to bring us home. He stole our club,nobody else.
Click to expand...

you work on fisher
ill work on acl

maybe we can get this done tag team style!

 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #89
covcity4life said:
you work on fisher
ill work on acl

maybe we can get this done tag team style!

Click to expand...

Ill dust off my AK47.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #90
valiant15 said:
Ill dust off my AK47.
Click to expand...

no disqualification match i take it?!
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #91
Godiva said:
I think if they were offered to buy the shares in ACL at a fair Price they would take it.
Higgs probably would be happy to sell their 50% - it's all up to CCC to offer their 50%.

All the nonesense about how everybody have moved on ... well, they have all moved to the position where the choice is either sell ACL to SBS&L or don't.
Click to expand...

Isn't this arse over tit, doesn't the buyer usually approach the seller with an offer?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #92
Godiva said:
I think if they were offered to buy the shares in ACL at a fair Price they would take it.
Higgs probably would be happy to sell their 50% - it's all up to CCC to offer their 50%.

All the nonesense about how everybody have moved on ... well, they have all moved to the position where the choice is either sell ACL to SBS&L or don't.
Click to expand...

So why didn't they buy the Higgs share recently then?
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #93
Astute said:
So why didn't they buy the Higgs share recently then?
Click to expand...

I think we have been over this a few times before ... or a few dozens of times.
sisu/ccc agree a joint plan where sisu acquire the ACL mortgage and discharge it, buy out the Higgs shares and finally buys the ccc's shares.
Then ACL financial director transfers to Yorkshire bank, Hoffman & Elliott turns up with Haskel IV, CCC buys the mortgage ... etc. Maybe the clue is hidden in between some of these events?
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #94
Godiva said:
I think we have been over this a few times before ... or a few dozens of times.
sisu/ccc agree a joint plan where sisu acquire the ACL mortgage and discharge it, buy out the Higgs shares and finally buys the ccc's shares.
Then ACL financial director transfers to Yorkshire bank, Hoffman & Elliott turns up with Haskel IV, CCC buys the mortgage ... etc. Maybe the clue is hidden in between some of these events?
Click to expand...

Is it ethical for a council to be in agreement with a private company to distress a charity/council's business in order to under value a mortgage?

Is that what the original agreement was that it seems the council stepped away from?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #95
dongonzalos said:
Is it ethical for a council to be in agreement with a private company to distress a charity/council's business in order to under value a mortgage?

Is that what the original agreement was that it seems the council stepped away from?
Click to expand...

It may not be ethical, anymore than it was in the first place, hatched I might add by the private company who are now bleating!
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #96
Godiva said:
I think we have been over this a few times before ... or a few dozens of times.
sisu/ccc agree a joint plan where sisu acquire the ACL mortgage and discharge it, buy out the Higgs shares and finally buys the ccc's shares.
Then ACL financial director transfers to Yorkshire bank, Hoffman & Elliott turns up with Haskel IV, CCC buys the mortgage ... etc. Maybe the clue is hidden in between some of these events?
Click to expand...

The last thing I read from the trust q+a on here the other day suggested for their £7M. investment clearing the loan entitled them the clubs original 50%
Whether that needs clarifying??
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #97
dongonzalos said:
Is it ethical for a council to be in agreement with a private company to distress a charity/council's business in order to under value a mortgage?

Is that what the original agreement was that it seems the council stepped away from?
Click to expand...

Nothing unethical about it, the only loser would be the bank which overstated the value of an asset in the first place
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #98
Godiva said:
I think we have been over this a few times before ... or a few dozens of times.
sisu/ccc agree a joint plan where sisu acquire the ACL mortgage and discharge it, buy out the Higgs shares and finally buys the ccc's shares.
Then ACL financial director transfers to Yorkshire bank, Hoffman & Elliott turns up with Haskel IV, CCC buys the mortgage ... etc. Maybe the clue is hidden in between some of these events?
Click to expand...

I have seen this sort of thing posted several times. Never seen any proof of it though. Yet so much is made of it.

If true why did they hold talks on buying the Higgs share before anything else happened?
 
D

DaleM

New Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #99
All this talk about SISU buying the Ricoh if ACL goes into administration is doing my head in . I may not be right but if ACL did go tits up and the administrator had to sell it ( Which seems to have been Sisu's plan) , what is to stop someone else coming along and offering more than Sisu's offer . Is there any guarantee Sisu could get control of the Ricoh or does an administrator have to sell it off to the highest bidder.
Obviously it is hypothetical but for the life of me I can't see how Sisu would be guaranteed the Ricoh even if they win the JR and ACL have to give the 14million back. Anyone can bid for it or am I just being a bit thick ?
 
T

The Gentleman

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #100
DaleM said:
All this talk about SISU buying the Ricoh if ACL goes into administration is doing my head in . I may not be right but if ACL did go tits up and the administrator had to sell it ( Which seems to have been Sisu's plan) , what is to stop someone else coming along and offering more than Sisu's offer . Is there any guarantee Sisu could get control of the Ricoh or does an administrator have to sell it off to the highest bidder.
Obviously it is hypothetical but for the life of me I can't see how Sisu would be guaranteed the Ricoh even if they win the JR and ACL have to give the 14million back. Anyone can bid for it or am I just being a bit thick ?
Click to expand...

If ACL did go into admin, would they get to choose the administrator, seems that happened somewhere else recently...............
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #101
DaleM said:
All this talk about SISU buying the Ricoh if ACL goes into administration is doing my head in . I may not be right but if ACL did go tits up and the administrator had to sell it ( Which seems to have been Sisu's plan) , what is to stop someone else coming along and offering more than Sisu's offer . Is there any guarantee Sisu could get control of the Ricoh or does an administrator have to sell it off to the highest bidder.
Click to expand...

If ACL went into admin isn't it probable that the lease reverts to CCC?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #102
chiefdave said:
If ACL went into admin isn't it probable that the lease reverts to CCC?
Click to expand...

Yes, but with a loan still to sort out.
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #103
DaleM said:
All this talk about SISU buying the Ricoh if ACL goes into administration is doing my head in . I may not be right but if ACL did go tits up and the administrator had to sell it ( Which seems to have been Sisu's plan) , what is to stop someone else coming along and offering more than Sisu's offer . Is there any guarantee Sisu could get control of the Ricoh or does an administrator have to sell it off to the highest bidder.
Obviously it is hypothetical but for the life of me I can't see how Sisu would be guaranteed the Ricoh even if they win the JR and ACL have to give the 14million back. Anyone can bid for it or am I just being a bit thick ?
Click to expand...

ACL is not going into administration and it was never the intention from any of the parties. There's NO danger of that happening now or even 5 years into the future unless something completely unforeseen happens. They may run out of cash, but then they may have assets to sell or the option to bring in another investor. Don't worry about the Ricoh - it will survive with or without ccfc there.
 
D

DaleM

New Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #104
chiefdave said:
If ACL went into admin isn't it probable that the lease reverts to CCC?
Click to expand...

I don't know . I am not into finance / property / law.

I am but a simple man who as long as I'm warm , well fed etc. and has enough money for a pint or two , is mostly content with my lot

Although I reckon this site could be used as an excellent resource for uni students studying any of the above .
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #105
DaleM said:
I don't know . I am not into finance / property / law.

I am but a simple man who as long as I'm warm , well fed etc. and has enough money for a pint or two , is mostly content with my lot

Although I reckon this site could be used as an excellent resource for uni students studying any of the above .
Click to expand...

It does - I am sure Fisher or Labovitch have mentioned it as one of their issues with CCC
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?