Its not doing the basics that drives you mad. That's 5 drops now, you aren't beating Australia with that.Another simple catch dropped!
Ffs this is getting embarrassing
Exactly!Its not doing the basics that drives you mad. That's 5 drops now, you aren't beating Australia with that.
Interesting stat from CricViz "England's pacers have taken 3-33 at 11.0 average with deliveries hitting stumps compared to 3-298 at 99.3 average with deliveries missing the stumps".
You see that and think of the old 'line and length' and that the army of England analysts would be telling them to bowl at the stumps but only 7% of deliveries this innings have been on target.
For those people defending Bazball, its noticeable how every Australian batsman has played themselves in and got to double figures!
In comparison, England lost 5 wickets for 4 runs!!
Bazball should be used only when your settled at the crease and the ball has gone soft IMHO.
Pisses me off no end with this bowling short and hoping for a misplaced swipe. In combination with the batting ridiculousness it's very much like Ange 'This is who we are' Postecoglou levels of stubbornness.Its not doing the basics that drives you mad. That's 5 drops now, you aren't beating Australia with that.
Interesting stat from CricViz "England's pacers have taken 3-33 at 11.0 average with deliveries hitting stumps compared to 3-298 at 99.3 average with deliveries missing the stumps".
You see that and think of the old 'line and length' and that the army of England analysts would be telling them to bowl at the stumps but only 7% of deliveries this innings have been on target.
2 were caught for nought nibbling at balls they shouldn't of been.Most of England’s dismissals were playing conventionally.
2 were caught for nought nibbling at balls they shouldn't of been.
And 2 were bowled for nought off balls that a village cricketer would of straight batted.
Even Crawley who got to 76 threw his wicket away gifting a simple catch.
Brookes dismissal was very poor, and Stokes ran himself out.
That's 7 wickets that Australia didn't have to work for.
In contrast our bowling has been very wayward, and let's not even mention our catching!
If we'd of batted correctly we would have had a better first innings score.Nothing to do with Bazball then. If we had held catches the game would be pretty close. It’s the fielding that’s been the big difference.
If we'd of batted correctly we would have had a better first innings score.
You simply cant defend losing 5 of your wickets for 4 runs against a pretty poor bowling attack (apart from Stark)
Look how every Australian batsman contributed, even the tail so far.
Then when you dont bowl well or hold catches you cant expect to compete.
The first test finished inside 2 days, it’ssimple to see why. If they put on a 150 run lead this match could be over in 3 days!
So reminiscent of countless doomed Ashes tours really. England pissing wickets away while the Aussies do nothing spectacular and rack up easy wins.Look at the difference in those partnerships. Imagine just trying to get in and build before going off, they're still going at a good rate
View attachment 47577
View attachment 47578
The stats tell a storyThey were out playing conventional cricket.
Only if the top order Brooks played rashly and Crawley will always be aggressive. Head abs Carey should have gone for nothing,
The stats tell a story
Every Australian got to double figures after playing themselves in.
We lost 5 wickets for 4 runs.
There's no argument.
That's not what stopped us scoring 500 runs and putting them under pressure and virtually making a defeat impossible.Other than Head and Carey played shots which should have been out when they hadn’t scored a run…
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?