Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

cricket 2025 (4 Viewers)

  • Thread starter tisza
  • Start date May 22, 2025
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
First Prev 31 of 31

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:31 AM
  • #1,051
fatso said:
Another simple catch dropped!

Ffs this is getting embarrassing
Click to expand...
Its not doing the basics that drives you mad. That's 5 drops now, you aren't beating Australia with that.

Interesting stat from CricViz "England's pacers have taken 3-33 at 11.0 average with deliveries hitting stumps compared to 3-298 at 99.3 average with deliveries missing the stumps".

You see that and think of the old 'line and length' and that the army of England analysts would be telling them to bowl at the stumps but only 7% of deliveries this innings have been on target.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer and fatso

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:34 AM
  • #1,052
For those people defending Bazball, its noticeable how every Australian batsman has played themselves in and got to double figures!

In comparison, England lost 5 wickets for 4 runs!!

Bazball should be used only when your settled at the crease and the ball has gone soft IMHO.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer and Saddlebrains

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:36 AM
  • #1,053
chiefdave said:
Its not doing the basics that drives you mad. That's 5 drops now, you aren't beating Australia with that.

Interesting stat from CricViz "England's pacers have taken 3-33 at 11.0 average with deliveries hitting stumps compared to 3-298 at 99.3 average with deliveries missing the stumps".

You see that and think of the old 'line and length' and that the army of England analysts would be telling them to bowl at the stumps but only 7% of deliveries this innings have been on target.
Click to expand...
Exactly!
We arnt even putting their batsmen under pressure, they can just sit tight and score off the bad balls (which have been numerous)
Whatever the outcome of this match, England need to go back to basics.
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:37 AM
  • #1,054
Whitewash incoming
 
Reactions: Brighton Sky Blue

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:39 AM
  • #1,055
fatso said:
For those people defending Bazball, its noticeable how every Australian batsman has played themselves in and got to double figures!

In comparison, England lost 5 wickets for 4 runs!!

Bazball should be used only when your settled at the crease and the ball has gone soft IMHO.
Click to expand...

Most of England’s dismissals were playing conventionally.
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:41 AM
  • #1,056
chiefdave said:
Its not doing the basics that drives you mad. That's 5 drops now, you aren't beating Australia with that.

Interesting stat from CricViz "England's pacers have taken 3-33 at 11.0 average with deliveries hitting stumps compared to 3-298 at 99.3 average with deliveries missing the stumps".

You see that and think of the old 'line and length' and that the army of England analysts would be telling them to bowl at the stumps but only 7% of deliveries this innings have been on target.
Click to expand...
Pisses me off no end with this bowling short and hoping for a misplaced swipe. In combination with the batting ridiculousness it's very much like Ange 'This is who we are' Postecoglou levels of stubbornness.
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:51 AM
  • #1,057
Grendel said:
Most of England’s dismissals were playing conventionally.
Click to expand...
2 were caught for nought nibbling at balls they shouldn't of been.

And 2 were bowled for nought off balls that a village cricketer would of straight batted.

Even Crawley who got to 76 threw his wicket away gifting a simple catch.

Brookes dismissal was very poor, and Stokes ran himself out.

That's 7 wickets that Australia didn't have to work for.

In contrast our bowling has been very wayward, and let's not even mention our catching!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:57 AM
  • #1,058
fatso said:
2 were caught for nought nibbling at balls they shouldn't of been.

And 2 were bowled for nought off balls that a village cricketer would of straight batted.

Even Crawley who got to 76 threw his wicket away gifting a simple catch.

Brookes dismissal was very poor, and Stokes ran himself out.

That's 7 wickets that Australia didn't have to work for.

In contrast our bowling has been very wayward, and let's not even mention our catching!
Click to expand...

Nothing to do with Bazball then. If we had held catches the game would be pretty close. It’s the fielding that’s been the big difference.
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve

tisza

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:00 PM
  • #1,059
Not a lot of surprises there. England fielding poor yet again. How the coaches/analysts can't messages to the bowlers about length etc is a mystery - although the captain and the bowlers themselves should be picking up on that especially having batted first
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:03 PM
  • #1,060
Grendel said:
Nothing to do with Bazball then. If we had held catches the game would be pretty close. It’s the fielding that’s been the big difference.
Click to expand...
If we'd of batted correctly we would have had a better first innings score.
You simply cant defend losing 5 of your wickets for 4 runs against a pretty poor bowling attack (apart from Stark)

Look how every Australian batsman contributed, even the tail so far.

Then when you dont bowl well or hold catches you cant expect to compete.
The first test finished inside 2 days, its simple to see why. If they put on a 150 run lead this match could be over in 3 days!

If you look at the depth of the Australian attack its very weak, theres no threat after Stark, we should be scoring 500 runs easily, not relying on Archer to get us past 300.
 
Reactions: Brighton Sky Blue

SkyBlueSoul

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:04 PM
  • #1,061
Look at the difference in those partnerships. Imagine just trying to get in and build before going off, they're still going at a good rate



 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:06 PM
  • #1,062
fatso said:
If we'd of batted correctly we would have had a better first innings score.
You simply cant defend losing 5 of your wickets for 4 runs against a pretty poor bowling attack (apart from Stark)

Look how every Australian batsman contributed, even the tail so far.

Then when you dont bowl well or hold catches you cant expect to compete.
The first test finished inside 2 days, it’ssimple to see why. If they put on a 150 run lead this match could be over in 3 days!
Click to expand...

They were out playing conventional cricket.

Only if the top order Brooks played rashly and Crawley will always be aggressive. Head abs Carey should have gone for nothing,
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:07 PM
  • #1,063
SkyBlueSoul said:
Look at the difference in those partnerships. Imagine just trying to get in and build before going off, they're still going at a good rate

View attachment 47577

View attachment 47578
Click to expand...
So reminiscent of countless doomed Ashes tours really. England pissing wickets away while the Aussies do nothing spectacular and rack up easy wins.
 
Reactions: fatso

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:09 PM
  • #1,064
Grendel said:
They were out playing conventional cricket.

Only if the top order Brooks played rashly and Crawley will always be aggressive. Head abs Carey should have gone for nothing,
Click to expand...
The stats tell a story

Every Australian got to double figures after playing themselves in.

We lost 5 wickets for 4 runs.

There's no argument.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:10 PM
  • #1,065
fatso said:
The stats tell a story

Every Australian got to double figures after playing themselves in.

We lost 5 wickets for 4 runs.

There's no argument.
Click to expand...

Other than Head and Carey played shots which should have been out when they hadn’t scored a run…
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:20 PM
  • #1,066
Grendel said:
Other than Head and Carey played shots which should have been out when they hadn’t scored a run…
Click to expand...
That's not what stopped us scoring 500 runs and putting them under pressure and virtually making a defeat impossible.
If you win the toss and choose to bat you need to post a decent total, especially against a fairly weak bowling attack.
 
Reactions: Brighton Sky Blue

Paul Anthony

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:31 PM
  • #1,067
Terrible batting for the most part yesterday, and couldn't catch a cold, never mind a cricket ball, today.

It's not looking great, is it...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
First Prev 31 of 31
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?