Yep, well said.
Robins bringing on Shipley for Hamer is not the reason Hyam missed from 4 yards.
I think rather than blame Robins... Maybe supporters should look at certain fan favourite players who fail to convert the simplest of chances and in general, sitters missed by others.
The actual problem you have is we didn't win.. We didn't win because we missed sitters... You then put the blame on the manager for not changing the game to win the match.
Our tactics were enough to win the match... Whose at fault?
No of course not. I don’t agree with ESB’s use of that word at all. I do agree with his analysis though.Perfectly reasonable opinion.
Does that make Robins a retard though? I think that's what people are annoyed about.
It’s a fair point. We constantly miss absolute gifts. We should be doing a lot better in front of goal. That doesn’t invalidate the idea that we’re not proactive enough towards the end of the game though.
We went from 541 to 532
Who would you have brought on? The kid from Rochdale?
There you go. O'Hare and Hamer, both knackered.
Subs made sense.
God you're a fucking clown aren't you?Why is Robins such a fucking retard?
Sometimes he says things that are completely baffling. Just got a point against a team with 10 times the budget, ROBINS OUT. RidiculousAfter all the hinting he's come out and said it at last
Never 3 points for me pre match every match.Pre match : would love a point
Post match: points not enough
Very strange mentality.
Stop trying to justify what you said, it’s not a good lookThe definition of retard: Delay or hold back in terms of progress or development. - That is exactly his approach to substitutions.
It gets used fashionably and therefore people just look at it without any real context, looking to get upset, largely because they don't like the manager being criticised.
I’ve already said I agreed with you about the personnel we took off and the timing of the changes. That wasn’t my issue with your post
God you're a fucking clown aren't you?
Stop trying to justify what you said, it’s not a good look
Gyo played AM, like for like with OHare.
Apologies if already mentioned but did anyone else think it was a penalty on Dacosta when he seemingly got unnecessarily pushed in the back by Sarr?
At the start of the year, your boss tells you that you can't get a pay rise this year (you like your job and you're happy to be there, so you're ok with that). In the middle of the year he then tells you there is a chance of a pay rise after all! So you work your nuts off and do a job deserving of a pay rise, only to be told at the end of the year there's no payrise after all.Yea but a point can't be enough pre match and not enough post match... That's mental thinking
Sometimes he says things that are completely baffling. Just got a point against a team with 10 times the budget, ROBINS OUT. Ridiculous
It’s a fair point. We constantly miss absolute gifts. We should be doing a lot better in front of goal. That doesn’t invalidate the idea that we’re not proactive enough towards the end of the game though.
The definition of retard: Delay or hold back in terms of progress or development. - That is exactly his approach to substitutions.
It gets used fashionably and therefore people just look at it without any real context, looking to get upset, largely because they don't like the manager being criticised.
We didn’t need to go two up front. The formation was working really well and we were outplaying them. What we needed to do was put fresh legs into the same formation 15 minutes earlier than we did.
Robins is too slow at making subs and always has been. His weakest attribute is changing games mid way through and I think that often means we drop points. Saying that doesn’t mean I want rid of him neither does it invalidate any of his achievements as he’s great at building a club.
Only on here can that be interpreted as a controversial statement because if you’re not 100% positive on everything then you’re a bet wetter. Absurd.
The definition of retard: Delay or hold back in terms of progress or development. - That is exactly his approach to substitutions.
It gets used fashionably and therefore people just look at it without any real context, looking to get upset, largely because they don't like the manager being criticised.
Hamer had a good chance also, chose to head it when ge had time to bring it down and shootReally max one it was behind him still should have scored
hyam ducked rather than volley it in and then didn’t direct it
Hardly defy belief
At the start of the year if somebody told me we'd draw with Watford at home I'd have said yes pleaseAt the start of the year, your boss tells you that you can't get a pay rise this year (you like your job and you're happy to be there, so you're ok with that). In the middle of the year he then tells you there is a chance of a pay rise after all! So you work your nuts off and do a job deserving of a pay rise, only to be told at the end of the year there's no payrise after all.
Would you be ok with that because at the start of the year you thought you weren't getting one anyway?
You don't even know the difference between a noun & a verb? Why am I not surprised...
I’m still not over Brum tbhi think it depends on the opposition, holding on to what we have against a contender for the autos is fine as far as I'm concerned, do the same against Cardiff midweek if the game has followed a similar pattern as today and it's another story.
Being a moron is a life choice, having a mental disability isn’tNeither is expressing faux outrage at a word someone used in the heat of the moment, then to go on and use insulting language yourself.
I'm not over forest either... It's such a shame we've really struggled to get our best team on the pitch this season... Im with you somewhat that we wouldn't be where we are now, but no team with our budget and resources can comfortably get through several key players being injured at once.. No teamI’m still not over Brum tbh
Being a moron is a life choice, having a mental disability isn’t
Yep, couldn’t believe they didn’t even mention itApologies if already mentioned but did anyone else think it was a penalty on Dacosta when he seemingly got unnecessarily pushed in the back by Sarr?
You've completely misunderstood again.
Again, easier route to take than digging yourself out of the hole you have dug trying to argue with me, realising that my points were entirely valid and you have nothing to say in return.
At the start of the year if somebody told me we'd draw with Watford at home I'd have said yes please
That's the bottom line
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?