italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Or more likely, putting together the words in such a way that Sisu can’t appeal on it and stops this farce once and for all.
Or more likely, putting together the words in such a way that Sisu can’t appeal on it and stops this farce once and for all.No judgement today but not back in court tomorrow? Does that mean the judges don't think its an open and shut case and want to dig deeper in to the documents provided?
Sounds that one of the judges thinks it needs looking at.Or more likely, putting together the words in such a way that Sisu can’t appeal on it and stops this farce once and for all.
2nd half was only 25 mins long.
you have to wonder why they didn't just postpone lunch for a little bit.
Unless it was a Greggs sausage roll, as you have to eat them hot, nowhere near as nice when cooled down
Maybe the judges wanted to talk about it over their Big Macs and Jaiger bombs?
Only if ACL as a company agree to it. CCC were only 50% of it. ACL would still own the lease but this time with 250 years to go and a far greater value. It would be ACL putting the lease on the market either the original one or the long one it had acquired. Could actually have made it unsaleable to Wasps or SISU. The time for a longer lease was at the start in 2007, we might never have got in this mess
ACL in 2014 had been forced pretty close to the wall, it would not have been an easy finance of the lease extension because ACL were running out of cash. Could CCC have lent ACL the money?..... I think we might well have had JR3 if they had, especially if it increased the value to acquire the site (completely opposite of what SISU were trying to achieve allegedly). But according to SISU the lease for 250 years was worth 47m where was ACL going to get even half that ? Even the short lease had a market value of £18m . ACL would have had to be seen to pay for it because of state aid and the scrutiny it was already under
SISU admitted yesterday they were around but not really interested
I loved going to Spain McDonald's and being offered a beerlast time I read about McDonalds, they were trying to go more healthy and now I hear they have introduced the McJaigerBomb
2nd half was only 25 mins long.
you have to wonder why they didn't just postpone lunch for a little bit.
Unless lunch it was a Greggs sausage roll, as you have to eat them hot, nowhere near as nice when cooled down.
I loved going to Spain McDonald's and being offered a beer
There is a third aspect to this from CCC's view point. That being the development of business around the Ricoh and an expectation that the owners of the stadium would be in a better position than CCC to develop new business, which would increase business rates payable to the council.
Really fucked off to hear how Cov City are battling the council in court.......they're not it's the London hedge fund SISU !
Thanks for that news, OSB. It's the first post on this thread that I've understood!on the positive side Germany just lost and are out of the World Cup :happy::happy::happy::happy:
Are you saying that an empty stadium and CCFC in Northampton is better for the people of Coventry than having Wasps and CCFC here?I like how they say the collapse of wasps will affect the wider community.... how does it affect Coventry? Good riddance I’d say
Are you saying that an empty stadium and CCFC in Northampton is better for the people of Coventry than having Wasps and CCFC here?
That’s not what I asked.CCFC will be a bigger loss than Wasps.
CCFC will be a bigger loss than Wasps.
Will it? Attendance for wasps is higher so much bring more revenue to the city?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That’s not what I asked.
Does it?
Unless football fans spend far more per head than rugby fans or there are other factors I’m missing then it must?
I’d bet wasps fans tend to travel from further away as well so more likely to buy lunch, stay over at a hotel etc.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s not loaded though.Try not asking loaded questions then.
It’s not loaded though.
Just before Wasps came that was the situation.
I’m comparing now to then.
Straight forward question.
It’s the same thing.Isn't that money to Wasps / Caterers than to the city?
Don't be obtuse Nick, they're the same economic benifits we all say City bring?Isn't that money to Wasps / Caterers than to the city?
It’s the same thing.
More income equals more business rates.
Not at all. The longer the lease left the better.I’ve read this and it says exactly the same as the link I posted - namely you should renegotiate in the last 18 months of tenancy a new lease and if the tenant lease has no security of tenure he has no rights at all!
Nope.His point was aimed at if Wasps went now wasn't it? Compared to if CCFC had to go because of Wasps being here.
Isn't that money to Wasps / Caterers than to the city?
Nope.
He asked solely about Wasps and the effect of them leaving.
Sometimes you need to look at the bigger picture.
They do if more businesses open, which is the case.Do the rates go up based on turnover then?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?