Well going by their forums (and that is all we have to judge on), they are pretty much all unamiously against it.
So come on Sickboy, Grendel, Nick and others, nail you colours to the mast. Would you be happy for the likes of ARCO to own the Ricoh
Muffins like spider think Wasps owners won't seek to maximise their profits as the stadium management company at the expense of the club.Yes why not?
So come on Sickboy, Grendel, Nick and others, nail you colours to the mast. Would you be happy for the likes of ARCO to own the Ricoh
Muffins like spider think Wasps owners won't seek to maximise their profits as the stadium management company at the expense of the club.
Every club acquires more debt. Show me a club that makes money.
What I don't get is why a faceless consortium for a west London rugby club is more acceptable than a faceless hedge fund that owns the club.
What about all this protecting the community asset bollocks as well.
Double standards.
At the end of the day we should all want CCFC in Coventry, playing at the Rioch and definitely not want a sports franchise moving into town.
Too much focus on stopping Sisu and getting them out, where in reality we should all be rooting for Coventry City FC first and foremost.
Hurrah! Well said, Otis. You've hit the nail on the you know what.
As well as higgs losing the appetite to sell
Sorry but I am thinking of CCFC first and a bloody rental deal off another Sisu company fears me with dread !!
They could fix their price at whatever they like !
We are already spiralling down with inflated debts and interest on that debt !
If the purchase was going to be by CCFC then I could get on board !!
Taking the SISU factor out of it for one second, the club does not have the funds or assets to buy anything, nevermind a stadium or a controlling stake in ACL. So the stadium/lease/whatever would be owned by a 'different' company.
Personally I believe that if the owners were to take control of ACL in it's entirety, then there would be enough income generated that could be classed as 'FFP' and 'non-FFP' in order to run the football club competitively as well as pay a dividend to shareholders.
What I don't get is why a faceless consortium for a west London rugby club is more acceptable than a faceless hedge fund that owns the club.
What about all this protecting the community asset bollocks as well.
Double standards.
Taking the SISU factor out of it for one second, the club does not have the funds or assets to buy anything, nevermind a stadium or a controlling stake in ACL. So the stadium/lease/whatever would be owned by a 'different' company.
Personally I believe that if the owners were to take control of ACL in it's entirety, then there would be enough income generated that could be classed as 'FFP' and 'non-FFP' in order to run the football club competitively as well as pay a dividend to shareholders.
At the end of the day we should all want CCFC in Coventry, playing at the Rioch and definitely not want a sports franchise moving into town.
Too much focus on stopping Sisu and getting them out, where in reality we should all be rooting for Coventry City FC first and foremost.
Thank the lord Otis, you've come back to us
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?