Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Could we build a temp ground at UoW? (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter chiefdave
  • Start date Jul 26, 2020
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #1
Lets assume there is something to the story of a new ground at the university, with the uni also posting a statement there seems to be. Could we build a temporary ground there while the main ground is going through planning and being built?

There's a fair bit of land up there, not entirely sure what belongs to the uni. Its certainly technically possible, several of the London Olympic venues were temporary.

Of course it sounds a bit ridiculous but its been done before. After the earthquake in New Zealand they built a new, temporary, stadium in 100 days. 18,000 capacity and designed to last 3-5 years. Was built by the company who handed London 2012 and also the new Spurs stadium.



New Christchurch Stadium | Populous

While Christchurch continues the painstaking process of rebuilding after last year’s destructive earthquake, optimistic signs of renewal are...
www.archilovers.com

one hundred days

Drawn together in a few short months, the new AMI Stadium by Populous provides a much-needed home ground for Christchurch's beloved Crusaders
trendsideas.com
 
Reactions: torchomatic, Mucca Mad Boys, covcity4life and 2 others
C

clarke1234

Active Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #2
Depends how much it’d cost
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #3
chiefdave said:
Lets assume there is something to the story of a new ground at the university, with the uni also posting a statement there seems to be. Could we build a temporary ground there while the main ground is going through planning and being built?

There's a fair bit of land up there, not entirely sure what belongs to the uni. Its certainly technically possible, several of the London Olympic venues were temporary.

Of course it sounds a bit ridiculous but its been done before. After the earthquake in New Zealand they built a new, temporary, stadium in 100 days. 18,000 capacity and designed to last 3-5 years. Was built by the company who handed London 2012 and also the new Spurs stadium.

View attachment 16063

New Christchurch Stadium | Populous

While Christchurch continues the painstaking process of rebuilding after last year’s destructive earthquake, optimistic signs of renewal are...
www.archilovers.com

one hundred days

Drawn together in a few short months, the new AMI Stadium by Populous provides a much-needed home ground for Christchurch's beloved Crusaders
trendsideas.com
Click to expand...

If they're serious about the new stadium, I can't why we'd need a second site, 3 temporary stands while building the permanent 4th, stand, then every summer teardown and replace one stand over the course of the season.
 
Reactions: torchomatic, Kneeza, TomRad85 and 3 others
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #4
I just can’t believe any of it. I know you said let’s assume but I really can’t.
I’m not having a go as it’s obvious we need to move on so I do agree but we really aren’t going to be building our new ground.

the timing was clearly to satisfy the EFL and fans. It was a quickly made up story with view to breaking Friday’s dreadful news. I just pray something happens and you are on to something.
 
Reactions: oscillatewildly and mr_monkey

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #5
Kingokings204 said:
I just can’t believe any of it. I know you said let’s assume but I really can’t.
I’m not having a go as it’s obvious we need to move on so I do agree but we really aren’t going to be building our new ground.

the timing was clearly to satisfy the EFL and fans. It was a quickly made up story with view to breaking Friday’s dreadful news. I just pray something happens and you are on to something.
Click to expand...

I doubt University of Warwick have decided to go along with a quickly made up story.
 
Reactions: Moff, GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee, torchomatic and 5 others

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #6
mark82 said:
I doubt University of Warwick have decided to go along with a quickly made up story.
Click to expand...

Exactly. They don’t get involved involved in these games.

Mark - wondering if on your next correspondence with Joy if you ask for fans to have regular monthly updates on the progression to building a stadium. Regular comms on the matter supported by evidence of site location to full build will gain a lot of support.
 
Reactions: Moff, AOM and mr_monkey

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #7
Temp ground would cost money and still need planning permission. Surely it would just be a distraction from the main project.

Do a 5 year deal with BCFC and EFL and just crack on. The actual build need not take long. It is all the red tape bollocks before it ...
 
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue, ccfc92 and mark82

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #8
AFCCOVENTRY said:
Exactly. They don’t get involved involved in these games.

Mark - wondering if on your next correspondence with Joy if you ask for fans to have regular monthly updates on the progression to building a stadium. Regular comms on the matter supported by evidence of site location to full build will gain a lot of support.
Click to expand...

Yep, will do.
 
Reactions: 1234CCFC, AFCCOVENTRY and mr_monkey

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #9
I’ve been doing my best to keep out of these stadium threads but I will make one point and then clear off. History has told us that just because a third party is making a statement with the club doesn’t mean it has to give SISU unfettered credibility. We have been here before with Higgs, CRBE, Ex head of Coventry’s COC, CRFC etc. Given our history I wouldn’t rule out UOW just being someone else to add to the list and no more than that.
 
Reactions: lordy_87

tisza

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #10
mark82 said:
Yep, will do.
Click to expand...
Ask her please No models etc and other fluff that they put out last time. Keep it simple and to the point.
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #11
mark82 said:
I doubt University of Warwick have decided to go along with a quickly made up story.
Click to expand...
While it might not have been quickly made up, 'planning a partnership' is also nowhere near far enough down the line to demonstrate genuine commitment to actually building anything. SISU may have done a great job this week in further exposing the difficulties in dealing with Wasps but they've also hugely backed themselves into a corner now - on the subject of stadiums they have 0 credit in the bank and to be making noises about a new stadium, while now stuck at St Andrews indefinitely, has put themselves in last chance saloon. Any credit they have accumulated for the recent on the pitch success will rapidly be eroded if tangible progress is not seen quickly and regularly. Personally I'll be gobsmacked if anything meaningful has happened before Wasps bonds are due in 2022.
 
Last edited: Jul 26, 2020
Reactions: shmmeee, Danceswithhorses, lordy_87 and 4 others

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #12
Esoterica said:
While it might not have been quickly made it up, 'planning a partnership' is also nowhere near far enough down the line to demonstrate genuine commitment to actually building anything. SISU may have done a great job this week in further exposing the difficulties in dealing with Wasps but they've also hugely backed themselves into a corner now - on the subject of stadiums they have 0 credit in the bank and to be making noises about a new stadium, while now stuck at St Andrews indefinitely, has put themselves in last chance saloon. Any credit they have accumulated for the recent on the pitch success will rapidly be eroded if tangible progress is not seen quickly and regularly. Personally I'll be gobsmacked if anything meaningful has happened before Wasps bonds are due in 2022.
Click to expand...
What sort of anything meaningful would you need to see in the next 18 months?

Partnership formally agreed
Land designated
Planning permission with warwick district council?
 
Reactions: Limey
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #13
AFCCOVENTRY said:
Exactly. They don’t get involved involved in these games.

Mark - wondering if on your next correspondence with Joy if you ask for fans to have regular monthly updates on the progression to building a stadium. Regular comms on the matter supported by evidence of site location to full build will gain a lot of support.
Click to expand...

As I say I’m not having a go. But it’s hardly the first time is it. The butts was never going to happen but got a thousand pages on here on how great it would be. I agree it would have been amazing but it quickly fell apart. We must be honest.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #14
Kingokings204 said:
As I say I’m not having a go. But it’s hardly the first time is it. The butts was never going to happen but got a thousand pages on here on how great it would be. I agree it would have been amazing but it quickly fell apart. We must be honest.
Click to expand...
That was another one nothing to do with the council
 
M

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #15
Good idea but you can’t build temporary roads and they will be Achilles heel of this project I’m afraid.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #16
Kingokings204 said:
As I say I’m not having a go. But it’s hardly the first time is it. The butts was never going to happen but got a thousand pages on here on how great it would be. I agree it would have been amazing but it quickly fell apart. We must be honest.
Click to expand...
Sounds like ccc put the mockers on that though
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #17
mark82 said:
I doubt University of Warwick have decided to go along with a quickly made up story.
Click to expand...

no I was being cynical but my point remains it’s no more than a chat between you and I about how one of us would like a Hilton hotel to own.
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #18
Nick said:
That was another one nothing to do with the council
Click to expand...


could well be. Was it all the council? I honestly don’t know enough. I’m not in the know clearly.
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #19
Kingokings204 said:
As I say I’m not having a go. But it’s hardly the first time is it. The butts was never going to happen but got a thousand pages on here on how great it would be. I agree it would have been amazing but it quickly fell apart. We must be honest.
Click to expand...

Indeed. That’s what now more than ever they have to maintain a regular stream of news in relation to the new stadium plans. It’s not plain sailing of course. For example planning might fail and it’s back to square 1. But that’s fine, that’s the way the cookie crumbles. But we need to see the seriousness and progression now. That will be the only acceptable thing on this shit situation.
 
Reactions: Kingokings204

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #20
Kingokings204 said:
As I say I’m not having a go. But it’s hardly the first time is it. The butts was never going to happen but got a thousand pages on here on how great it would be. I agree it would have been amazing but it quickly fell apart. We must be honest.
Click to expand...

FWIW, the Butts was something that was seriously looked at in the past and as a temporary location for us. CRFC are supportive but the ground just isn't suitable either as a permanent or temporary home. Too many obstacles.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #21
Kingokings204 said:
no I was being cynical but my point remains it’s no more than a chat between you and I about how one of us would like a Hilton hotel to own.
Click to expand...

Yes, it's early stages. To be fair to them, we've been pushing for them to provide an update as soon as they can, and they have. The important bit now is how this is followed up. Regular communication will be key, but things like planning move slowly so we can't get upset if major updates take time but the communication needs to continue and it should be 2-way. If it is to happen, it needs to be something their customers are happy with.
 
Reactions: ccfcchris and Kingokings204
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #22
Sky Blue Pete said:
What sort of anything meaningful would you need to see in the next 18 months?

Partnership formally agreed
Land designated
Planning permission with warwick district council?
Click to expand...

I mean, if we're going to avoid the worst-case scenario of spending five more years playing in Birmingham, then we need all of the above to have happened in the next 18 months at a bare minimum.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #23
Kingokings204 said:
no I was being cynical but my point remains it’s no more than a chat between you and I about how one of us would like a Hilton hotel to own.
Click to expand...

It's a bit more than that isn't it? Why would the Uni announce it?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #24
Nick said:
It's a bit more than that isn't it? Why would the Uni announce it?
Click to expand...

CCFC Football Stadium Plans - a Freedom of Information request to University of Warwick

Following the wonderful news regarding a permanent home for CCFC on the University of Warwick site (https://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/2020/july/news-coventry-city-and-university-of-warwick-announce-new-sky-blues-stadium-plans). Can I please request the following: -Correspondence to and from the...
www.whatdotheyknow.com
 
Reactions: Irish Sky Blue
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #25
Nick said:
It's a bit more than that isn't it? Why would the Uni announce it?
Click to expand...
All we have is a commitment to look at some land, with a coded appeal for investment and logistical partners. There's still no substance. Readings for Warwick can be:

  • They believe it
  • It's merely expanding what they intend to do anyway
  • The cachet of a football club will help them get the investment they want in difficult times.

The more I think on it, the more I think it makes little difference to Warwick if we actually realise a ground or not, so them coming along for the journey is no risk to them, with maybe benefit. Their reputation won't suffer if it falls through. We, however, need to show more than a vague statement as we have a track record of such things.

This whole thing follows similar patterns to previous efforts, just more polished. Talk is cheap, we've had plenty of that.
 
Reactions: rondog1973, skystevie43, Irish Sky Blue and 3 others

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #26
Grendel said:

CCFC Football Stadium Plans - a Freedom of Information request to University of Warwick

Following the wonderful news regarding a permanent home for CCFC on the University of Warwick site (https://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/2020/july/news-coventry-city-and-university-of-warwick-announce-new-sky-blues-stadium-plans). Can I please request the following: -Correspondence to and from the...
www.whatdotheyknow.com
Click to expand...
Interesting, worth keeping an eye on that.

Who is Martin Goodman?
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #27
Magwitch said:
Good idea but you can’t build temporary roads and they will be Achilles heel of this project I’m afraid.
Click to expand...

But during the weeks there are tens of thousands around there for the uni and business parks. So this wouldn't be a great deal different. Yes, a number of the students would live nearby/on campus but that just needs a park-and-ride set up.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #28
chiefdave said:
Lets assume there is something to the story of a new ground at the university, with the uni also posting a statement there seems to be. Could we build a temporary ground there while the main ground is going through planning and being built?

There's a fair bit of land up there, not entirely sure what belongs to the uni. Its certainly technically possible, several of the London Olympic venues were temporary.

Of course it sounds a bit ridiculous but its been done before. After the earthquake in New Zealand they built a new, temporary, stadium in 100 days. 18,000 capacity and designed to last 3-5 years. Was built by the company who handed London 2012 and also the new Spurs stadium.

View attachment 16063

New Christchurch Stadium | Populous

While Christchurch continues the painstaking process of rebuilding after last year’s destructive earthquake, optimistic signs of renewal are...
www.archilovers.com

one hundred days

Drawn together in a few short months, the new AMI Stadium by Populous provides a much-needed home ground for Christchurch's beloved Crusaders
trendsideas.com
Click to expand...

Great idea and even small scale 5 to 10k would do whilst building a real 1
 
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #29
I think that any venue in the Coventry area is far preferable to St Andrews. Ten to fifteen thousand would be okay for a temporary home. I seen somewhere on here that upwards of 20k people make their way in and out of the U of W everyday. The crowd for a football match on Saturday afternoon or Tuesday evening should be something that can be accommodated.
I was in Bath the other week visiting one of my son's who now lives in the area. We had a look at Bath RFC stadium which is in the city centre. It appears to have one permenant stand and three temporary ones. He tells me at the end of the season the three temporary structures are removed and the whole pitch area and surroundings reverts to a public park. If this is true it shows how easy it is to erect stands. I think the ground has something like 14k capacity.
 

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #30
The question could be are there any other suitable sites, probably outside CCC jurisdiction that could be used on a temporary basis. I've mentioned before the viability or otherwise of Brandon.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #31
Don't the Uni have something for athletics? I am no expert but I am sure i have seen something up there.

(Obviously it isn't going to be a championship quality stadium)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #32
Nick said:
Don't the Uni have something for athletics? I am no expert but I am sure i have seen something up there.

(Obviously it isn't going to be a championship quality stadium)
Click to expand...

This?

 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #33
Kingokings204 said:
I just can’t believe any of it. I know you said let’s assume but I really can’t.
I’m not having a go as it’s obvious we need to move on so I do agree but we really aren’t going to be building our new ground.

the timing was clearly to satisfy the EFL and fans. It was a quickly made up story with view to breaking Friday’s dreadful news. I just pray something happens and you are on to something.
Click to expand...

What’s the end game here?

Do you believe the club’s goal is to obtain control of the RICOH?

If so, I’d like to know your thoughts on how the club could realistically go about this?
 
T

theferret

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #34
Magwitch said:
Good idea but you can’t build temporary roads and they will be Achilles heel of this project I’m afraid.
Click to expand...

Why? A temporary ground of say 12,000 (not ideal, but we could manage for a few years) would mean around 3000 cars descending on the university on a matchday; far fewer than on a typical day there. They'd be no need for any road infrastructure changes.
 
Reactions: Kneeza

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #35
Mucca Mad Boys said:
What’s the end game here?

Do you believe the club’s goal is to obtain control of the RICOH?

If so, I’d like to know your thoughts on how the club could realistically go about this?
Click to expand...

I think the end game is something, anything, that makes Joy feel vindicated at this point. I think it stopped being about CCFC or the financial aspects some time ago. I agree I can’t see how even a positive outcome for Sisu results in the club getting the Ricoh. I’m yet to be convinced if Wasps go bust they disappear and don’t just get reincarnated like football teams do. But I won’t pretend to understand rugby finances. Best bet is likely some cash settlement I’d guess. Though the way Sisu have dragged their heels on a new ground suggests they think the Ricoh is still a long term possibility. Otherwise they’d be a bit more motivated to get going on it.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?