Because they are importing from an accredited producer and obviously have significantly bigger volume commitments on offer than the "long established PPE supplier" (beauty gown supplier that is) who was able to offer 40k gowns per month. The awarded supplier was able to offer 25 million gowns per year.Trying to work out how a new company with £200 in assets is more qualified than a long established PPE supplier to be awarded a £110M contract.
Yeh, you're right. Don't know much about public procurement. Know a bit about private though, but i'm just going on the information that is out there which apparently everyone else is able to jump to chunky conclusions with...You know fuck all about public procurement
The government spent £252M on 50M face masks that wasn’t fit for purpose. Since when was £252M a non story?Because they are importing from an accredited producer and obviously have significantly bigger volume commitments on offer than the "long established PPE supplier" (beauty gown supplier that is) who was able to offer 40k gowns per month. The awarded supplier was able to offer 25 million gowns per year.
Non story really
Sorry are we talking about face masks or the gowns from Medpro vs Florence Roby? I think you may have misread my post, or your 110m post was about facemasks and i misunderstoodThe government spent £252M on 50M face masks that wasn’t fit for purpose. Since when was £252M a non story?
So if you give someone an order for £250M and the goods turned out to be unfit for purpose would that be a job well done?Yeh, you're right. Don't know much about public procurement. Know a bit about private though, but i'm just going on the information that is out there which apparently everyone else is able to jump to chunky conclusions with...
I’m talking about the government.Sorry are we talking about face masks or the gowns from Medpro vs Florence Roby? I think you may have misread my post, or your 110m post was about facemasks and i misunderstood
Not from the supplier, no. Could you quote a post where I said anything even remotely similar to that please?So if you give someone an order for £250M and the goods turned out to be unfit for purpose would that be a job well done?
You’re writing the defence for the government. You’re the one who thinks it’s a non story.Not from the supplier, no. Could you quote a post where I said anything even remotely similar to that please?
Not from the supplier, no. Could you quote a post where I said anything even remotely similar to that please?
Would you expect a credit for the goods having established that they wasn’t fit for purpose? Would you have established penalty clauses for failure to meet the contract?Not from the supplier, no. Could you quote a post where I said anything even remotely similar to that please?
Would you expect a credit for the goods having established that they wasn’t fit for purpose? Would you have established penalty clauses for failure to meet the contract?
What’s incompetent about the Medpro deal?You're angrily sticking up for what is at best incompetence & at worst all out corruption. You haven't got a clue, but fair play for all the sidestepping & desperation to stick up for them no matter what- its mildly entertaining on a Sunday night.
Yes and yes. And if that wasn’t done that’s incompetent.Would you expect a credit for the goods having established that they wasn’t fit for purpose? Would you have established penalty clauses for failure to meet the contract?
I said the medpro deal is a non story yes. Are you unable to separate them in your head?You’re writing the defence for the government. You’re the one who thinks it’s a non story.
Don’t get it"why do you hate your country so much? Would you rather be in Italy?"
Why do I need to separate them. It’s the consistent behaviour of the government you’re defending. It’s cost the country hundreds of millions.I said the medpro deal is a non story yes. Are you unable to separate them in your head?
Why do I need to separate them. It’s the consistent behaviour of the government you’re defending. It’s cost the country hundreds of millions.
It’s not is it, it’s that specific example I spoke about and you’ve tried your best to twist that into me saying the government have acted perfectly in every single Procurement exercise they’ve ever carried out.Why do I need to separate them. It’s the consistent behaviour of the government you’re defending. It’s cost the country hundreds of millions.
You’re not involved mate and that’s okay sometimes, it’s not all about youIgnore him, he's just a thick who gets laughed at
Non story.Clearly
Maybe this will help enlighten you
to thick
Good luck !Feeel like crap, booked in for a test today
Feeel like crap, booked in for a test today
Clearly
Maybe this will help enlighten you
You’re not involved mate and that’s okay sometimes, it’s not all about you
anddddd put on ignore
Pretending to be rational libertarians was the same trick used to get people behind Trump and is as much about owning the Dems/hating labour as actually supporting Trump/Johnson.There is a solid 40% in this country who back everything the Tories do. The increasingly fascist policies wash over them at best. Even somebody like G who claims to be a libertarian voted for them
How very cynical of you. It clearly states on their website that they aren’tAs someone pointed out on Twitter today, why do the taxpayers alliance never pipe up about any of this stuff.
One could be forgiven for thinking they have a partisan political agenda.
The growing sense of anger & frustration is palpable up here.....unless they get the (wider) support package right (which they won't) then mass disobedience & civil unrest will follow......
Had a nice simple message, protect the NHS.I can definitely see disobedience of measures/new measures as I’ve said before. Already seeing it. Everyone bought into first lockdown but are struggling to this time
That sums it up really. Was all nice and simple at the start, stay at home, protect the NHS. And those that couldn't work got the money they need to survive via furlough. As soon as Cummings made his trip and rather than sack him they decide to start messing around with the message it all fell apart.Had a nice simple message, protect the NHS.
Now we seem to be protecting the NHS / protecting the economy / allowing for eye test trips / keeping schools and universities open etc. etc.
I've no real idea what our strategy is just atm. Maybe it'll become clearer at 3pm(!)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?