Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Channel 4 news reporting johnson told in no uncertain terms to lock down on March 9th not 23rd.
#followingthescience.Channel 4 news reporting johnson told in no uncertain terms to lock down on March 9th not 23rd.
Where did you see this Pete? Been looking around and can’t see anything. Did find this though from April We scientists said lock down. But UK politicians refused to listen | Helen WardChannel 4 news reporting johnson told in no uncertain terms to lock down on March 9th not 23rd.
0 to 50 isn’t surging ffs
Hardly surging, 50 odd cases
Few days later and now into the hundreds and lockdown reintroduced. China has called it 'very severe'.
And this in a place that had practically no cases/deaths (or at least recorded ones - it is China after all) for quite some time.
Still think it's a great idea to open up when we've got cases in four figures and deaths in the hundreds? Don't think it's got the chance to re-emerge and it's just going away?
It’s completely different, it’s come from another disgusting Slaughter market So nah it’s different hereFew days later and now into the hundreds and lockdown reintroduced. China has called it 'very severe'.
And this in a place that had practically no cases/deaths (or at least recorded ones - it is China after all) for quite some time.
Still think it's a great idea to open up when we've got cases in four figures and deaths in the hundreds? Don't think it's got the chance to re-emerge and it's just going away?
Best bit was it was not me but China who was talking about their cases surging.
This pandemic is a great study in confirmation bias.
'tss?
It’s completely different, it’s come from another disgusting Slaughter market So nah it’s different here
You need to get outside more, weird quoting me all day on thisOkay Dum, it's not covid-19 that is surging then.
You need to get outside more, weird quoting me all day on this
Pingu’s opening question to Johnson was right on the money. Starmer didn’t look great constantly avoiding an answer on schools.
Pingu’s opening question to Johnson was right on the money. Starmer didn’t look great constantly avoiding an answer on schools.
1 question and Johnson blew it by deciding to try a half baked "unions" "zinger".
Once again he wiffled and piffled and failed miserably.
but when Starmer questioned Johnson on child poverty Johson started going off on one about kids returning to school. I think Johnson looks more and more out of his depth by the day.
but when Starmer questioned Johnson on child poverty Johson started going off on one about kids returning to school. I think Johnson looks more and more out of his depth by the day.
I think it will look differently to most people who watched it. Still I’m glad that he has agreed that teachers should be providing catch up work over summer. Wonder what that tool Williamson will announce next week.
I didn't see it as Starmer's question to answer. He should and could have turned it back on the PM though and come out with a big win. I guess that is what you are maybe inferring?Pingu’s opening question to Johnson was right on the money. Starmer didn’t look great constantly avoiding an answer on schools.
I agree, but I think most non political junkies will see Starmer looking a bit hesitant and Johnson going on the offense.
I didn't see it as Starmer's question to answer. He should and could have turned it back on the PM though and come out with a big win. I guess that is what you are maybe inferring?
How the "going on the offensive" is him not answering a question? Anyone who watched it will see Johnson not being able to answer a question once again.
Totally agreePretty much yeah.
That’s what he’s actually doing but in making jokes and waving his arms around it gives a perception of confidence even if he’s talking nonsense.
Pretty much yeah.
That’s what he’s actually doing but in making jokes and waving his arms around it gives a perception of confidence even if he’s talking nonsense.
Not really working at the moment as people are listening to what he says. He may get better if the ever open up the house fully but until then he waves his arms and the optics are bad. No answer and silence
I agree, but I think most non political junkies will see Starmer looking a bit hesitant and Johnson going on the offense.
That’s what he’s actually doing but in making jokes and waving his arms around it gives a perception of confidence even if he’s talking nonsense.
Do the schools have any idea how much work is actually being done by pupils? Its great that the move to remote teaching was done so quickly and that work can be provided for over the summer but are the kids actually paying attention? The memorial is rammed full of large groups of kids every day which makes me wonder.Still I’m glad that he has agreed that teachers should be providing catch up work over summer.
Slimbridge WildFowl Trust?but she says of the 3000+ tests that have been administered at SWFT
So you’re saying this is Covid 20 in China not Covid 19?'tss?
It’s completely different, it’s come from another disgusting Slaughter market So nah it’s different here
Do the schools have any idea how much work is actually being done by pupils? Its great that the move to remote teaching was done so quickly and that work can be provided for over the summer but are the kids actually paying attention? The memorial is rammed full of large groups of kids every day which makes me wonder.
Agree from the optics POV.Pretty much yeah.
That’s what he’s actually doing but in making jokes and waving his arms around it gives a perception of confidence even if he’s talking nonsense.
It's obvious that the archaic set up of HOP suit the baying partisan cheerleading approach.It's the presentation that has the biggest effect on a lot of people. I think there's a big correlation between personality and more politics being available on TV. Of course it's a good thing that the public can see what's going on rather than it being secretive behind-closed-doors but it has led to more of an emphasis on the individual than what is actually being said.
As I've said before take the likes of Johnson and Trump, take away the gesticulations, appearance and inflections/accent etc so you're just left with the words and it sounds like a small child babbling away.
It's obvious that the archaic set up of HOP suit the baying partisan cheerleading approach.
One thing that has become absolutely evident through the remote /reduced attendance,and observations of the Scottish Parliament recently is the executive approach .
Becomes much less about physical 'performance' and completely about the content quality and accuracy of the answers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?