shmmeee
Well-Known Member
All at once or recorded content and live? If the latter I hope you’re getting twice the wage. If the former then
I am now having to teach classes that are half in the room and half at home. It’s almost like I foresaw this exact scenario
Certainly couldn’t be any bloody worse.Be a better candidate than Shaun Bailey
All at once or recorded content and live? If the latter I hope you’re getting twice the wage. If the former thenwhat twat thought that up?
Certainly couldn’t be any bloody worse.
All at once. Plus if it's a practical we are expected to live stream it-all while everyone's wearing a mask hovering over a Bunsen Burner
“Get your mums lighters out and follow along at home”. Feel for you man. Here’s hoping there’s only one more term of it.
It's not ideal but it's to be expected, stick a red rosette on a piece of turd and the idiots here would vote for it, coupled with the outrageously poor opposition its always going to happen. Not sure why the London mayor affects you so much in your ditch in Willenhall though, David.Khan winning easily will also upset some of the floofs on here lie Tracksuit tom and Marty mcCry
It's not ideal but it's to be expected, stick a red rosette on a piece of turd and the idiots here would vote for it, coupled with the outrageously poor opposition its always going to happen. Not sure why the London mayor affects you so much in your ditch in Willenhall though, David.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
It really is, Boris was an anomaly, he transcended party lines. I doubt you'll get another Conservative mayor in London in my lifetime if I'm honest.None of that explains Khans lead. As much as it annoys some people he’s actually well liked and generally seen as doing a good job.
This is the city that voted Boris Johnson in as mayor remember. Not sure it’s “fed rosette on a piece of turd territory”.
Trackie Tom talks shite. Remember when he attacked Khan for repeating PHE advice? Comedy gold.None of that explains Khans lead. As much as it annoys some people he’s actually well liked and generally seen as doing a good job.
This is the city that voted Boris Johnson in as mayor remember. Not sure it’s “fed rosette on a piece of turd territory”.
Remember when you thought Lookman was better than Maddison you dribbling imbecile.Trackie Tom talks shite. Remember when he attacked Khan for repeating PHE advice? Comedy gold.
London far better now than under Boris? deary me what a load of shit. He'll get in because he's Labour and London is more Labour than its ever been. As I say the appalling other candidates don't help.
If you offered him out to the country as a Labour leader for example you'd see how popular he really is.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
I'm sorry I thought you'd blocked me you tragic individual, I guess that was bullshit too.Mate you're a weirdo with a history of talking shit.
London is "more labour than it's ever been" because people can see it's getting better. Under Boris it was awful and nothing was ever getting done as all the money was being spunk and unpopular cable cars and vanity bridges that would never get built.
Under Boris london was a place where the rich could get richer and the poor were seemingly being movedto the out boroughs.
Apart from knife crime which as we have established is not under the operational control of City Hall what is worse?
I'm sorry I thought you'd blocked me you tragic individual, I guess that was bullshit too.
Honestly, I've deleted a rant as I did promise myself not to get drawn into another argument with you. You are a stain on this forum.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Both of you give too much credit to the role of the London Mayor in any of London's problems
Surely LAPD would be a bit slow to respond?I don't, I understand he is very limited in his power and that a lot of the things that people think are in his purview are either Westminster or LA areas of control.
Surely LAPD would be a bit slow to respond?
I would assume because at the same time European countries are pausing AZ vaccinations and 'undermining confidence' they are also threatening to block exports destined for the UK.Why are people so hell bent on attacking European countries over the Az vaccine when the US FDA hasn't even approved it yet and no one says a word about them "undermining confidence in the vaccine"?
Moving back on to the point of this thread.
Why are people so hell bent on attacking European countries over the Az vaccine when the US FDA hasn't even approved it yet and no one says a word about them "undermining confidence in the vaccine"?
I would assume because at the same time European countries are pausing AZ vaccinations and 'undermining confidence' they are also threatening to block exports destined for the UK.
Also, I'm fairly sure the USA delay is wrapped up with the commercial interests of Pfizer and Johnson & johnson who are both competing in the market.....I'm sure theres quite a powerful lobby to hold the not-for-profit competitor back as long as possible.
London far better now than under Boris? deary me what a load of shit. He'll get in because he's Labour and London is more Labour than its ever been. As I say the appalling other candidates don't help.
If you offered him out to the country as a Labour leader for example you'd see how popular he really is.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
But he’s not running in the country, so what a bunch of flag wavers in the Home Counties think isn’t really relevant. But even so, I’m not sure you’re right. He’s his YouGov ranking for Labour politcians:
View attachment 19206
All strictlyThe Ed Balls revival still on? He was really unpopular at one stage
The Ed Balls revival still on? He was really unpopular at one stage
He’s gone the Boris Johnson route of becoming a TV star first and a politician second.
Not sure how accurate YouGov is these days but even so you fail to show the percentage of people that see him negatively, much higher than both Starmer and Balls.But he’s not running in the country, so what a bunch of flag wavers in the Home Counties think isn’t really relevant. But even so, I’m not sure you’re right. He’s his YouGov ranking for Labour politcians:
View attachment 19206
Not sure how accurate YouGov is these days but even so you fail to show the percentage of people that see him negatively, much higher than both Starmer and Balls.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?