SBAndy
Well-Known Member
Though, of course, one could argue neither really attempted to stop it.
Getting me jab this afternoon!
"It's just a little prick with a needle."
"It's what the little prick is gonna do with the needle that concerns me!"
Getting me jab this afternoon!
"It's just a little prick with a needle."
"It's what the little prick is gonna do with the needle that concerns me!"
And that gentlemen is why johnson and his cronies get away with it.
Now do Sweden vs its next door neighbours!
They haven't got time to be managing the pandemic and getting up to the old corruption.
No, that charts shows two countries who decided not to really do anything at the start to slow the virus crossing into our borders and thus make tracing infections more manageable and reducing community transmission once it inevitably got in. Then when it was here failing to bring in things like lockdown/distancing etc earlier to again reduce opportunity for it to spread. And then once they had reducing those controls way to early to allow it to regain a foothold.
So if you want to make that comparison how about comparing against countries that did?
Sweden have admitted they fucked this one right up.
No, that charts shows two countries who decided not to really do anything at the start to slow the virus crossing into our borders and thus make tracing infections more manageable and reducing community transmission once it inevitably got in. Then when it was here failing to bring in things like lockdown/distancing etc earlier to again reduce opportunity for it to spread. And then once they had reducing those controls way to early to allow it to regain a foothold.
So if you want to make that comparison how about comparing against countries that did?
Sweden have admitted they fucked this one right up.
I dint make the charts. Just was interested as shows one country that hasn't realy done anything vs a country that has claimed its done everything.
I dint make the charts. Just was interested as shows one country that hasn't realy done anything vs a country that has claimed its done everything.
But weird to pick the two internationally recognised worst responses.
We also never had a death reduction strategy, just a hospital capacity management strategy.
And given the similarity of the graphs I'd suggest that the country claiming it's done everything isn't being entirely truthful.
If that’s true, then Hancock is shit at negotiating. 5K in exchange for a 14 mil contract!!They haven't got time to be managing the pandemic and getting up to the old corruption.
Don’t tell anyone they couldn’t have done more and the vaccines are a huge worldwide successAnd given the similarity of the graphs I'd suggest that the country claiming it's done everything isn't being entirely truthful.
Joyous.Bristol Covid variant may reinfect vaccinated Brits, SAGE expert warns
Sir Jeremy Farrar said there were currently 750,000 infections in the UK, 75 times more than the number he wants it to fall to. Another Sage scientist also called for infections to fall further.www.dailymail.co.uk
I keep clicking on this thread. I know I shouldn't, but I do.Joyous.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Joyous.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Bristol Covid variant may reinfect vaccinated Brits, SAGE expert warns
Sir Jeremy Farrar said there were currently 750,000 infections in the UK, 75 times more than the number he wants it to fall to. Another Sage scientist also called for infections to fall further.www.dailymail.co.uk
The freedom conspirators will dislike it.The lockdown lovers will like this.
Joyous.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Scaremongering and a lot of “could” and “might”Aye but if the vaccine nevertheless provides protection against severe disease it isn't a huge problem. I am in no way a denialist but I am finding the recent reporting to be hysterical, particularly in relation to variants and vaccine efficacy.
There's been some very irresponsible reporting. I know we're in a clickbait era but surely with something like this it should be reigned in a bit. You see headlines and then read the article to see its one expert who has said something pretty wide ranging but the media have chosen to highlight the worse case scenario and have that as their headline and all over social media.Aye but if the vaccine nevertheless provides protection against severe disease it isn't a huge problem. I am in no way a denialist but I am finding the recent reporting to be hysterical, particularly in relation to variants and vaccine efficacy.
There's been some very irresponsible reporting. I know we're in a clickbait era but surely with something like this it should be reigned in a bit. You see headlines and then read the article to see its one expert who has said something pretty wide ranging but the media have chosen to highlight the worse case scenario and have that as their headline and all over social media.
That’s chilling isn’t it?KPMG have got 3 scenarios in their January economic outlook report. They're based on certain assumptions, all have lockdown ending in April but the worse one has further lockdowns in July, October and November due to the spread of new variants.
I'm not sure where they get the information they base their scenarios on.
Lets hope the upside scenario proves accurate
View attachment 18667
That’s chilling isn’t it?
I do need someone to explain to me why when people won’t get seriously ill we should worry. You know in simple Janet and Jane language
is it mutations are more likely or something else?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?