No definitely not, this cancer is global and its growing.
The virus isn’t the cancer I’m referring to, the cancer is the machine/system pulling the strings behind the likes of Trump Bolsonaro Boris and co.This disease won't be busted by bullshitters and charlatans, but by those who have dedicated their careers to evidence and academic rigour. That should be a lesson for the world, but it won't be and we'll have climate change causing carnage not long after this (same century) which will also demand scientific innovation as the answer.
The virus isn’t the cancer I’m referring to, the cancer is the machine/system pulling the strings behind the likes of Trump Bolsonaro Boris and co.
James Cleverly talking utter bullshit on the BBC this morning, the brass neck of these wankers.
They actually think that because they've done well on the vaccine we should forget about all their other fuck ups and the death toll - vermin.
Is any other country actually doing it? Italy’s very much concentrating on doing both the jabs rather than rolling out single doses - seems to be fine so far and one the leading countries in Europe for full inoculation.Still no data on the Pfizer one that 12 weeks is OK, I think (may be since I last checked, tend to get all my hideous news from this thread atm!!), so I guess you could argue, what's a week or two between friends?
Think there is data the Oxford one is OK at 12 but, as we see with other countries, I'll be happier once there's fairly uniform agreement that's the way to go.
Watching the 54 days programmes it made me think that why don’t Bbc and other organisations just look at the news reel and press conferences . There’s pure gold in them for anyone wishing to hold leaders responsible for promises and aims and getting things wrongJames Cleverly talking utter bullshit on the BBC this morning, the brass neck of these wankers.
They actually think that because they've done well on the vaccine we should forget about all their other fuck ups and the death toll - vermin.
Watching the 54 days programmes it made me think that why don’t Bbc and other organisations just look at the news reel and press conferences . There’s pure gold in them
Cleverly is a party man and put out purely to troll and spread disinfo.
Britain has been rolling out the shot among all age groups after the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) was the first regulator to approve it in December, but some other European countries have said more data is needed before it is given to those over 65.
“Since [initial approval] we’ve seen more data coming through from AstraZeneca as more people are completing the trial, which highlights again that efficacy in the elderly is seen, and there’s no evidence of lack of efficacy,” Munir Pirmohamed, chair of the Commission on Human Medicines Covid-19 Vaccines Benefit Risk Expert Working Group said at a MHRA news briefing.
Certainly is!More data coming through. Good news:
Extra trial data shows Oxford/AstraZeneca jab effective in elderly, MHRA says
British regulators have received extra trial data from AstraZeneca that supports their view that the Covid-19 vaccine developed with Oxford University is effective in the elderly, a vaccines official said on Friday.
Reuters reports:
UK Covid: 'too early' to decide to ease measures in March, says Hancock; Oxford jab 'protects against UK variant' – as it happened
Health secretary says NHS still under pressure; Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine as effective against UK variant as original virus, research suggestswww.theguardian.com
Saw a story earlier where Ursula Von der leyen was a bit more conciliatory, implicitly admitted that the EC had fucked up underestimating the scale and under investing in manufacturing capacity. Politically the Germans, French and others have backed themselves into a bit of a corner at the cost of their citizens.
Is that because the Germans had turned on her?
James Cleverly talking utter bullshit on the BBC this morning, the brass neck of these wankers.
They actually think that because they've done well on the vaccine we should forget about all their other fuck ups and the death toll - vermin.
WHY ARE THEY SO SHIT AT INFORMATION?!?
All UK over-50s should get vaccine by May, No 10 confirms after confusion
Hancock confirms Covid jabs schedule after it was initially denied when revealed in election planwww.theguardian.com
Watching the 54 days programmes it made me think that why don’t Bbc and other organisations just look at the news reel and press conferences . There’s pure gold in them
Part of me wants them to mess up and then I stop and think it’s people lives - get a grip peteThe vaccination program is going well. If they can.pull it forward 2 or 3 months then that's amazing but why announce it now and give people false hope if it can't be done?
Ridiculous way to carry on.
Part of me wants them to mess up and then I stop and think it’s people lives - get a grip pete
Ohhh no they don't.BBC news reporting that the government intend to have all over 50's vaccinated by May.
Ohhhh yes they do.Ohhh no they don't.
There's no doubt a successful vaccination roll out will make a lot of people forget all the screw up a but it's a small price to pay for getting back to normality
Until they get reelected and the next clusterfuck they make. No-one should be allowed to forget the monumental number of fuck-ups they've made just because they look to have got one thing right near the end.
Imagine in 10 years time, they've got reelected because people have forgotten and another similar crisis occurred. Do you expect them to not make the same mistakes as they have this time? They might do a few things more quickly but on the whole I'd expect it be 'protect the economy' first (even though they won't say it it's what their actions will amount to) and protect the rich while everyone else suffers like it always is. Plus by that time they may well have sold the NHS up the river so their rich buddies can profit and we'll be totally in the shit.
I assume because they were not part of the clinical trials?Can someone with some science/medicine know how give me an idea why they don’t appear to be offering the vaccine to CEV or Vulnerable children under 16?
Thanks
Can someone with some science/medicine know how give me an idea why they don’t appear to be offering the vaccine to CEV or Vulnerable children under 16?
Thanks
A lot worse?Oxford vaccine not as effective against South African strain. The dirty bastard
A lot worse?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?