But is there a point where if the 2nd dose is left to long the 1st becomes less effective, or worse still is rendered ineffective.Along similar lines to a previous post about the interval between doses where I suggested 3 weeks was a minimum
But is there a point where if the 2nd dose is left to long the 1st becomes less effective, or worse still is rendered ineffective.
glad my mum had the biontechGerman regulators reckon Oxford vaccine only 8% efficacy in the over 65s. If true a complete and utter disaster.
German regulators reckon Oxford vaccine only 8% efficacy in the over 65s. If true a complete and utter disaster.
I’ve had an uneasy feeling for months now that there seems to be a certain inevitability about the whole situation that things aren’t destined to end well.German regulators reckon Oxford vaccine only 8% efficacy in the over 65s. If true a complete and utter disaster.
German regulators reckon Oxford vaccine only 8% efficacy in the over 65s. If true a complete and utter disaster.
Furnished holiday home. I can dm the website if you are interested. In cornwall
glad my mum had the biontech
German regulators reckon Oxford vaccine only 8% efficacy in the over 65s. If true a complete and utter disaster.
Got a link to their data?
unverified at the moment, just reports I think
seems strange at a time the EU is threatening to block exports of AZ vaccine and even potentially take legal action against AZ for planned reductions of supply
Fucking hope so, would feel like a massive kick in the bollocks.It's sounds like the initial source was an anonymous leak to a newspaper so I wouldn't read too much into it.
Pretty sure the flu vaccine efficacy each year is between 20 and 50% and that’s seen as effective
Not as bad as I thought
Yep agreedAt the end of the day it’s all about preventing serious illness rather than infection. That’s the data we ultimately have the most interest in
Interesting overview of what’s been happening (and potentially why)
Let’s hope AZ and MHRA are correct. This is following on from the Guardians article from an Israel source (which Whitty tore apart) about Pfizer’s efficacy only being 33% after one jab
The anti vaxers will be lapping this up either way
At the end of the day it’s all about preventing serious illness rather than infection. That’s the data we ultimately have the most interest in
I'm going to go with this for now:
“No idea where their number comes from. I know 8 percent is the percentage of people over 65 in the study, but not the efficacy. Not sure if the reporter got mixed up. MHRA would not approve a vaccine with 8 percent efficacy.”
Plus I don't know anything about German newspapers and which ones talk bollocks and which ones don't.
German media rates about 5he same as ours on the cuntometer
Just been reading about other countries and schooling.
Use of public buildings to increase space
Also thinking about Labour manifesto to give free broadband to all households looking quite forward thinking
Handsleblat and Bild are both fairly serious papers from what I understand.
Everyone back in
Handsleblat and Bild are both fairly serious papers from what I understand.
I mean I don’t know, and I’m always sus of one anonymous source. But I got the impression they were both more like the Times than the Sun. that said, these days the Times is like the Sun.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?