Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
In my own mind that if sisu stay in charge of our club we will cease to be a league team before we leave sixfields. It's all about driving down expenditure.
In my own mind that if sisu stay in charge of our club we will cease to be a league team before we leave sixfields. It's all about driving down expenditure.
In my own mind that if sisu stay in charge of our club we will cease to be a league team before we leave sixfields. It's all about driving down expenditure.
What do you reckon torch?Thankfully it is just in your own mind.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Do you not agree that expenditure should be driven down?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Do you not agree that if you drive expenditure down by £1, but in the process lose revenue of £2, that you are worse off?
Do you not agree that expenditure should be driven down?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
What do you reckon torch?
Stay up this year
£10m loss at least to 31/5/14.
Lose and appeal jr so still hanging over us
Lose murph, baker, fleck this summer and replace with lesser standard players
God forbid sp gives up or gets a better gig.
Debate and opinions. What's yours?
In my own mind that if sisu stay in charge of our club we will cease to be a league team before we leave sixfields. It's all about driving down expenditure.
Of course, but then the following season you drive costs down by another £1 and with no real loss in revenue. You the. Start to rebuild under a new cost model like Swansea.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Of course, but then the following season you drive costs down by another £1 and with no real loss in revenue. You the. Start to rebuild under a new cost model like Swansea.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
This reminds me of a comment reportedly made by a doctor - "the operation was a success but the patient died".
What do you reckon torch?
Stay up this year
£10m loss at least to 31/5/14.
Lose and appeal jr so still hanging over us
Lose murph, baker, fleck this summer and replace with lesser standard players
God forbid sp gives up or gets a better gig.
Debate and opinions. What's yours?
But it's all ifs and buts. The only thing you missed out there was a meteor striking the earth.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
with sisu in charge ? never going to happen , they only want the ground/land, not the team.Of course, but then the following season you drive costs down by another £1 and with no real loss in revenue. You the. Start to rebuild under a new cost model like Swansea.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Of course, but then the following season you drive costs down by another £1 and with no real loss in revenue. You the. Start to rebuild under a new cost model like Swansea.
Was that operation called Not One Penny More?
Was that operation called Not One Penny More?
I think that the point is that you need a coherent and rational business plan.
Simply "driving down expenditure" can do more harm than good.
As things currently stand, I'm finding it difficult to discern what that plan is.
You're comment sounds good, but we've been "driving down expenditure" since the days of KD, yet revenues still appear to be falling faster.
Talking of medical professionals grendull the anaesthetist has just turned up.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
No that's operation 'remove the negligent, incompetent quack killing the club' so we can start afresh.
In my own mind that if sisu stay in charge of our club we will cease to be a league team before we leave sixfields. It's all about driving down expenditure.
...yeah obviously it has to be worse than what we have got, obvious innit because we are now such a juicy prize to exploit after 6 years of Sisu.Dr Nick Riviera our new Chairman.
I personally think that if they managed to get the Ricoh then they would still continue with the team as the two go hand in hand as we can already see. I also think nothing significant is going to happen until the judicial review. I can see this land application process carrying on "conveniantly" until then. One thing that I don't fully understand is this; if they were to win the judicial review how does it improve their chances of acquiring the Ricoh?
I personally think that if they managed to get the Ricoh then they would still continue with the team as the two go hand in hand as we can already see. I also think nothing significant is going to happen until the judicial review. I can see this land application process carrying on "conveniantly" until then. One thing that I don't fully understand is this; if they were to win the judicial review how does it improve their chances of acquiring the Ricoh?[/QUOTE]
I think we're all guessing they will seek it as part of any compensation package, should they win off course.
I personally think that if they managed to get the Ricoh then they would still continue with the team as the two go hand in hand as we can already see. I also think nothing significant is going to happen until the judicial review. I can see this land application process carrying on "conveniantly" until then. One thing that I don't fully understand is this; if they were to win the judicial review how does it improve their chances of acquiring the Ricoh?
It's a difficult one, I believe we would have gotten relegated at some point probably the season after. The heartbreaking thing for me is, in our relegation season we were in the bottom 3-4 in terms of our turnover despite 9-10 teams averaging lower crowds than us.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Difficult to say. Personally, I think that had we kept or replaced King we would have had an OK season - but we'll never know....
The only point that I was trying to make is that whilst controlling expenditure is "a good thing", this is dependant on the overall context in which this is taking place.
I used to have the odd exchange with Tommy Atkins who was very much in favour of KD's cost reduction exercise. I used to point out that (in my view) it was leading us to relegation, that would cost us a multiple of any savings.
That's not to say that running a football club is easy. It's bloody difficult and I would have great sympathy with any owners, if I believed that they had a rational plan that was trying to do the best for the football club.
Difficult to say. Personally, I think that had we kept or replaced King we would have had an OK season - but we'll never know....
The only point that I was trying to make is that whilst controlling expenditure is "a good thing", this is dependant on the overall context in which this is taking place.
I used to have the odd exchange with Tommy Atkins who was very much in favour of KD's cost reduction exercise. I used to point out that (in my view) it was leading us to relegation, that would cost us a multiple of any savings.
That's not to say that running a football club is easy. It's bloody difficult and I would have great sympathy with any owners, if I believed that they had a rational plan that was trying to do the best for the football club.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?