Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Comments Removed From CCFC Articles (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter TheRoyalScam
  • Start date Sep 16, 2011
Forums New posts

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2011
  • #1
Check out the CT website - they've removed all comments from their articles on CCFC.

Interesting that in Alan Poole's video verdict he claims that Dulieu, Clouting and Clarke believe that the CT is 'anti-CCFC' - just what planet is this sorry excuse of a board on?

Talk about paranoia - this is outright censorship!

:blue:

Perhaps they've just read this post - the comments have just returned!
 
Last edited: Sep 16, 2011

Glenn Storer

New Member
  • Sep 16, 2011
  • #2
Should note, a friend on the supporters group enlightened me last home game that a certain G. Hoffman has shares in Trinity Newspapers.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Sep 16, 2011
  • #3
Got one question really - why does anyone read the CT anyway?

Wouldnt be the first Board of directors that felt the CT had a vendetta against them. Seem to remember other Boards banning the paper in the past
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2011
  • #4
I'd advocate the removal of the 'comments' section on every site on the internet personally.
 
S

SkyBlueScottie

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2011
  • #5
Glenn Storer said:
Should note, a friend on the supporters group enlightened me last home game that a certain G. Hoffman has shares in Trinity Newspapers.
Click to expand...

Why did you think the Mirror have been spot on about us for the last couple of years?
 
C

crowsnest

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 16, 2011
  • #6
Glenn Storer said:
Should note, a friend on the supporters group enlightened me last home game that a certain G. Hoffman has shares in Trinity Newspapers.
Click to expand...
He is a non-executive director of trinity mirror group.
 
H

howzer

Banned
  • Sep 17, 2011
  • #7
The cov telegraph is one of the worst papers you can buy, it prints very inacurate portrails of courts cases for a start i can assure you of that after being a victim of their misleading prints, it does have a knack of over sensationalising everything, which is not a good quality even if the excuse is "well they all do that" ... local papers used to be about quality local journalism and usually they had a reputation for fighting on the behalf of local poeple and causes, usually against the local authoritys and powerful organisations.

The CT has fell into decline in recent years and has become a bit of a joke, so many of the stories in there now are just simply he said she said type rubbish. But most upsettingly for City fans is the way in which it has become on a par with the notorious football rumour websites.. it is unbelievable how many players it has linked us with that were simply never coming to our club, raising and dashing our hopes for the sake of a headline, for example the Eastwood saga ..its on its off, it is back on, no it is now off, this went on for months! we just want the news when it happens, leave the speculation and rumours to the rags, in our local paper we want the news that has taken place not might take place.

As for the CT being anti city, im afreaid i have to agree, i dont think there is any point denying it the CT are proper doom merchants, the amount of times i have listened to a sisu representative or a manager live on the BBC CRW interviews it appears in the CT the next day with a differing account, always with the slant on certain words usually being out of context. In my opinion it is the CT that has caused the problems between Hoffman and the owners. If the Telegraph had stayed out of the matter and simply allowed the 2 parties some privacy, (in other words not reported on either sides opinion or information), the sale would have been more likely to go through, but Hoffman used the telgraph as junk mail to get his message out to the fans whilst at the same time SISUS reservedness and silence ( a professional attitude in a position of a possible sale of the club) was put across to the fans in the CT as a negative attitude ... Im really pleased this thread was made because this has been a thought of mine for a while now. I used to love the CT but have to admit I and many freinds have stopped buying the paper now, it just hasnt been the same since it went to morning sales.


lets hope the next time the club is negotiating a sale of the club the CT stay out of it and they simply report it is sold the day after it is. with all the facts set in stone. Good reporting.
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2011
  • #8
oldskyblue58 said:
Got one question really - why does anyone read the CT anyway?

Wouldnt be the first Board of directors that felt the CT had a vendetta against them. Seem to remember other Boards banning the paper in the past
Click to expand...

It's free online, sometimes breaks news (although often stuff speculated on here first, not always!), and to see if the reporter was at the same game as me and my mates.

I do agee though that as far as CCFC is concerned, the rag is sadly lacking in a quality journo with initiative who can "think outside the box". We have yet to have any local journo or broadcaster ask many simple questions, such as for example "Would the board allow a banner in saying "SISU Out" if it has a fire certificate?" (Eakin claims he "kinda" asked this, "indirectly", but he didn't at all!)
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2011
  • #9
howzer said:
The cov telegraph is one of the worst papers you can buy, it prints very inacurate portrails of courts cases for a start i can assure you of that after being a victim of their misleading prints, it does have a knack of over sensationalising everything, which is not a good quality even if the excuse is "well they all do that" ... local papers used to be about quality local journalism and usually they had a reputation for fighting on the behalf of local poeple and causes, usually against the local authoritys and powerful organisations.

The CT has fell into decline in recent years and has become a bit of a joke, so many of the stories in there now are just simply he said she said type rubbish. But most upsettingly for City fans is the way in which it has become on a par with the notorious football rumour websites.. it is unbelievable how many players it has linked us with that were simply never coming to our club, raising and dashing our hopes for the sake of a headline, for example the Eastwood saga ..its on its off, it is back on, no it is now off, this went on for months! we just want the news when it happens, leave the speculation and rumours to the rags, in our local paper we want the news that has taken place not might take place.

As for the CT being anti city, im afreaid i have to agree, i dont think there is any point denying it the CT are proper doom merchants, the amount of times i have listened to a sisu representative or a manager live on the BBC CRW interviews it appears in the CT the next day with a differing account, always with the slant on certain words usually being out of context. In my opinion it is the CT that has caused the problems between Hoffman and the owners. If the Telegraph had stayed out of the matter and simply allowed the 2 parties some privacy, (in other words not reported on either sides opinion or information), the sale would have been more likely to go through, but Hoffman used the telgraph as junk mail to get his message out to the fans whilst at the same time SISUS reservedness and silence ( a professional attitude in a position of a possible sale of the club) was put across to the fans in the CT as a negative attitude ... Im really pleased this thread was made because this has been a thought of mine for a while now. I used to love the CT but have to admit I and many freinds have stopped buying the paper now, it just hasnt been the same since it went to morning sales.


lets hope the next time the club is negotiating a sale of the club the CT stay out of it and they simply report it is sold the day after it is. with all the facts set in stone. Good reporting.
Click to expand...

Does this mean all the non"GET SISU OUT, even if we don't have a buyer lined up" fans are part of SISU and all the anti SISU work for the CT?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?