i think i'll have to go to the shop and tell them, could be due to the new opening.I think people have said that they didn't get emails for orders, although the orders did arrive fine. I'd expect to have received something ordered on the 2nd by now though.
Why? Other than a greedy landlord debts and bills have always been paid.I'm amazed that people trust these sharks so much as to order stuff on line!
Would you like to re-type that in order to clarify exactly what you are saying? BTW good evening Grendel.Why? Other than a greedy landlord debts and bills have always been paid.
Why? Other than a greedy landlord debts and bills have always been paid.
...... and the Higgs Centre .........oh and the Inland Revenue ......... oh and the padded seats ........ oh and the bricks in the wall.
Yes, let's conveniently :Why? Other than a greedy landlord debts and bills have always been paid.
The Revenue was a consequence of liquidation and significantly less than was left by the last lot.
Have the seats and bricks been removed? I wasn't aware of that? I also wasn't aware that the bill of payment went to SISU?
The Revenue was a consequence of liquidation and significantly less than was left by the last lot.
Have the seats and bricks been removed? I wasn't aware of that? I also wasn't aware that the bill of payment went to SISU?
Yes, let's conveniently :
-forget about the landlord who built us the Ricoh in hour of need, our previous owners having sold us down the river.
-forget the local charity who bought our 50% share of ACL when we (CCFC) were on our knees and desperately needed cash.
-forget the legal fees SISU owe the Higgs charity they promised to pay , after they pulled out of buying the 50% ACL share.
-forget that SISU, instead of negotiating (because of the deterioration of our (ccfc) finances due to our self inflicted relegation), unilaterally stopped paying any rent at all.
And forget about all the other creditors when SISU put ccfc into administration.
Very convenient to forget any facts that get in the way of your argument Grendel, me old mate :facepalm:
Warped, absolutely warped....Forget over-charging rent for years (if the Ricoh really can survive without the club, why the fuck were they charging this city's biggest community asset over the odds to play in a venue built for them in the first place?)
Forget walking away from a done deal which would still have seen the council retain freehold ownership and 50% of the management company for political reasons.
Forget trying to force the club into administration citing a colossal bluff by TF as a completely bogus reason for doing so.
Forget refusing to sign the CVA which could well jeopardise our promotion chances this season (and for what?)
Forget trying to sue NTFC (and absolute fucking embarrassment).
It works both ways you see. They're all at fault, you do get that don't you?
Forget over-charging rent for years (if the Ricoh really can survive without the club, why the fuck were they charging this city's biggest community asset over the odds to play in a venue built for them in the first place?)
Forget walking away from a done deal which would still have seen the council retain freehold ownership and 50% of the management company for political reasons.
Forget trying to force the club into administration citing a colossal bluff by TF as a completely bogus reason for doing so.
Forget refusing to sign the CVA which could well jeopardise our promotion chances this season (and for what?)
Forget trying to sue NTFC (and absolute fucking embarrassment).
It works both ways you see. They're all at fault, you do get that don't you?
You're assuming that ACL had the finances to be able to offer a cheaper deal than the legally agreed rent amount or survive without the club after they opened the doors to the place.Forget over-charging rent for years (if the Ricoh really can survive without the club, why the fuck were they charging this city's biggest community asset over the odds to play in a venue built for them in the first place?)
Forget walking away from a done deal which would still have seen the council retain freehold ownership and 50% of the management company for political reasons.
Forget trying to force the club into administration citing a colossal bluff by TF as a completely bogus reason for doing so.
Forget refusing to sign the CVA which could well jeopardise our promotion chances this season (and for what?)
Forget trying to sue NTFC (and absolute fucking embarrassment).
I do.It works both ways you see. They're all at fault, you do get that don't you?
[/QUOTE]You're assuming that ACL had the finances to be able to offer a cheaper deal than the legally agreed rent amount or survive without the club after they opened the doors to the place.
Forget walking away from a done deal which would still have seen the council retain freehold ownership and 50% of the management company for political reasons.
We've only got the word of SISU/TF that there was any deal, the council have said nothing about it and that Isn't proof.
Forget trying to force the club into administration citing a colossal bluff by TF as a completely bogus reason for doing so.
I'll try and forget as it was a really really dumb thing to say. However people should be very careful what they say in public lest it be taken the wrong way or acted on unnecessarily. You might ask Gerald Ratner or Edwina Curry about that as they can doubtless tell you what trouble you can get into with careless talk.
Forget refusing to sign the CVA which could well jeopardise our promotion chances this season (and for what?)
Okay I will.
Forget trying to sue NTFC (and absolute fucking embarrassment).
Again, done.
It works both ways you see. They're all at fault, you do get that don't you?
Agreed, the rent was too high...for a club in league 1. Circa 2009/2010 we were in the Championship with the playing personnel in my opinion capable of mounting a creditable promotion campaign. Strangely, the rent was never an issue then (were not Sisu offered different rent agreement back then, but declined it). It's only become an issue in the last couple of years as it has dawned on them what a colossal fuck up they have made of on pitch matters. In top flight football, the annual rental fee would be chicken feed.Forget over-charging rent for years (if the Ricoh really can survive without the club, why the fuck were they charging this city's biggest community asset over the odds to play in a venue built for them in the first place?)
Forget walking away from a done deal which would still have seen the council retain freehold ownership and 50% of the management company for political reasons.
Forget trying to force the club into administration citing a colossal bluff by TF as a completely bogus reason for doing so.
Forget refusing to sign the CVA which could well jeopardise our promotion chances this season (and for what?)
Forget trying to sue NTFC (and absolute fucking embarrassment).
It works both ways you see. They're all at fault, you do get that don't you?
i'm anti sisu, but fair play my stuff arrived today, not all of it, but they tried,lol.I'm amazed that people trust these sharks so much as to order stuff on line!
Can you read. Where the hell does he state blame should be shared equally. In fact a couple of posts later ferret clearly writes that sisu's list of wrong doings would be considerably longer. Open your eyes.Agreed, the rent was too high...for a club in league 1. Circa 2009/2010 we were in the Championship with the playing personnel in my opinion capable of mounting a creditable promotion campaign. Strangely, the rent was never an issue then (were not Sisu offered different rent agreement back then, but declined it). It's only become an issue in the last couple of years as it has dawned on them what a colossal fuck up they have made of on pitch matters. In top flight football, the annual rental fee would be chicken feed.
Walking away from a done deal? The claims of a lying organisation.
A colossal bluff!! Well tee and furthermore hee! Tim threatened liquidation, but he was only joking, so that's okay. Those council types are so chompingly gullible....
A CVA which was also rejected by HMRC. If it was loaded in Sisu's favour, as is likely given Appletons convenient with the truth admin process, then fair play for rejecting.
Misguided for sure, but weren't those who'd apportion equal blame for this fiasco constantly lobbying the council to do something to get Cov back in Cov.
Sure it works both ways, but don't ever kid yourself the blame is to be equally shared.
The usual empty-headed responses from the usual suspects completely blind to the truth. Of course SISU must shoulder most of the blame (and if I were to compile a similar list for SISU it would be considerably longer), but everything I have listed in my previous post is fact. You're just going to have to live with that.
What does that tattoo say?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?