Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Club finances (3 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Lamps
  • Start date Yesterday at 5:44 PM
Forums New posts

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:44 PM
  • #1
One of the old favourites where the topic would end up with over 100 pages of replies. These days not spoken too much about. The problem is have is life overtook me for a period of time and I don't know if anything happened then.

Couple of questions.

When Lampard took over had all the money from the sales of Hamer and Gyokeres been spent? If so did we bring in any other large amounts of money?

If not then as well as losses have we found about 8m for the signings since Lampard took over? Could this be anything to do with this mysterious 15m?

On a total guess again. Not going back too many years our squad was worthless. We looked an average League 2 side. We've had a few victories in the transfer market. Squad value now 100m+? Is King taking a little gamble on signing players that will help our quest in promotion as well as gaining in value? KKH is an excellent signing with this view.

Or am I just dreaming and we have already spent the Gyokeres next installment?
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and theskyisthelimit

Briles

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 8:46 PM
  • #2
Lamps said:
One of the old favourites where the topic would end up with over 100 pages of replies. These days not spoken too much about. The problem is have is life overtook me for a period of time and I don't know if anything happened then.

Couple of questions.

When Lampard took over had all the money from the sales of Hamer and Gyokeres been spent? If so did we bring in any other large amounts of money?

If not then as well as losses have we found about 8m for the signings since Lampard took over? Could this be anything to do with this mysterious 15m?

On a total guess again. Not going back too many years our squad was worthless. We looked an average League 2 side. We've had a few victories in the transfer market. Squad value now 100m+? Is King taking a little gamble on signing players that will help our quest in promotion as well as gaining in value? KKH is an excellent signing with this view.

Or am I just dreaming and we have already spent the Gyokeres next installment?
Click to expand...
There was a poster on here who sadly passed away who would've been all over these questions!
 
Reactions: SkyBlue_Adam, Brylowes, lifeskyblue and 8 others
B

Bigelvesy

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 9:54 PM
  • #3
I know absolutely nothing factual to answer these questions, but i just wanted to say i think there is a common misconception that transfers are paid in upfront lump sums.
In reality they are stretched out and structured over multiple years, and therefore the “budget/pot of cash” goes further.
Additional to that the reported figures are often the total potential amount including performance benchmarks and not the guaranteed money.

The most obvious one i see related to Cov is Ellis Simms, often claimed to have cost us £7-8m but this is the overall value of the transfer, we initially paid 3.5m and the rest is made up of installments and performance (team and personal) milestones.

Personally, and only based on gut feel i think we have so far had all incoming covered by the outgoing, whether there is any left without more outgoings im not sure
 
Reactions: Hobo and CovRes

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:47 PM
  • #4
Bigelvesy said:
I know absolutely nothing factual to answer these questions, but i just wanted to say i think there is a common misconception that transfers are paid in upfront lump sums.
In reality they are stretched out and structured over multiple years, and therefore the “budget/pot of cash” goes further.
Additional to that the reported figures are often the total potential amount including performance benchmarks and not the guaranteed money.

The most obvious one i see related to Cov is Ellis Simms, often claimed to have cost us £7-8m but this is the overall value of the transfer, we initially paid 3.5m and the rest is made up of installments and performance (team and personal) milestones.

Personally, and only based on gut feel i think we have so far had all incoming covered by the outgoing, whether there is any left without more outgoings im not sure
Click to expand...
But does the pot go further, because we're receiving transfer fees in installments too. So swings and roundabouts.
 
Reactions: Lamps

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 2:58 AM
  • #5
Bigelvesy said:
I know absolutely nothing factual to answer these questions, but i just wanted to say i think there is a common misconception that transfers are paid in upfront lump sums.
In reality they are stretched out and structured over multiple years, and therefore the “budget/pot of cash” goes further.
Additional to that the reported figures are often the total potential amount including performance benchmarks and not the guaranteed money.

The most obvious one i see related to Cov is Ellis Simms, often claimed to have cost us £7-8m but this is the overall value of the transfer, we initially paid 3.5m and the rest is made up of installments and performance (team and personal) milestones.

Personally, and only based on gut feel i think we have so far had all incoming covered by the outgoing, whether there is any left without more outgoings im not sure
Click to expand...
It's all about balancing the books. All transfer deals are different. You need to make sure what you have coming in with transfers covers what's going out. Otherwise you are going to eat into your playing budget or you need money putting into our club. The major priority is keeping up with payments on transfers.

I thought the Gyokeres and Hamer money was spent when Robins was with us. Since then we have spent about another 8m. The money we have coming from them won't cover it.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 6:44 AM
  • #6
Yes we’ll be paying for most signings in instalments, but the money has still been committed without player sales this year.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 7:11 AM
  • #7
The last accounts to 31 May 24 show £23.6m profit on player sales. They present transfer fees as debts within one year and over one year totalling £7.3m and £9.7m and refers to spending post the accounting period of an additional £10m. It's a little difficult to follow really. The wage bill went up by £6m / 33%.

King had made a £30m credit facility available to the club, which increased by £24m in year.
 
Last edited: Today at 7:27 AM
Reactions: wingy and Brylowes

Major Tom

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 11:29 AM
  • #8
Think it's fair to say it looks and certainly feels that we are in a better position than we have been for some time and we are a lot more secure than some clubs in the EFL. Only overhanging doubt is the stadium and what the future holds for us and the owners in terms of rent and stability.
Increasing attendances and profile can only be good for the club which will help bring in better quality players driving more success.
Feels like a great time to be a city supporter with young family who go up too. Another good year in the championship, a strong start with close to 30,000 attendances is some turn around from where we were. Attendance 5 years ago pre-pandemic start of the 2019/20 season first home game 6,534 home to Southend.
 

Balli001

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:39 PM
  • #9
Major Tom said:
Think it's fair to say it looks and certainly feels that we are in a better position than we have been for some time and we are a lot more secure than some clubs in the EFL. Only overhanging doubt is the stadium and what the future holds for us and the owners in terms of rent and stability.
Increasing attendances and profile can only be good for the club which will help bring in better quality players driving more success.
Feels like a great time to be a city supporter with young family who go up too. Another good year in the championship, a strong start with close to 30,000 attendances is some turn around from where we were. Attendance 5 years ago pre-pandemic start of the 2019/20 season first home game 6,534 home to Southend.
Click to expand...
That was at St Andrews though as part mitigation
 

Major Tom

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:10 PM
  • #10
Balli001 said:
That was at St Andrews though as part mitigation
Click to expand...
yes good call of course.. seems an age ago in football terms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • mark821 minute ago
Total: 3 (members: 1, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?