Clinical (1 Viewer)

LJC_CCFC

Well-Known Member
Crewe were and we weren't, that's the difference
 

The CableGuy

Well-Known Member
City: 25 shots, 13 on target, 15 corners, 0 goals.
Crewe: 7 shots, 4 on target, 3 corners, 3 goals.

Wasteful? Yep. But we hit the post and their keeper was MoTM for them.
 

Speng

Well-Known Member
We can't keep a clean sheet ,
Our strikers / midfielders very poor , we seem to need 20+ chances to score 1 , they had 4 chances and scored 3
The squad could not have played any worse in front of 31 k fans , Soooo disappointed ,
Not sure if I'm now going to crew ,
 

zigojacko

New Member
We can't keep a clean sheet ,
Our strikers / midfielders very poor , we seem to need 20+ chances to score 1 , they had 4 chances and scored 3
The squad could not have played any worse in front of 31 k fans , Soooo disappointed ,
Not sure if I'm now going to crew ,

It takes something to at least create those chances though. Were they that bad? They just failed to finish the chances...
 

kg82

Well-Known Member
Seriously, poor? We weren't poor by any stretch. They were clinical as ljc says and we weren't. That's not playing poor. So that's a ridiculous statement.
 

LJC_CCFC

Well-Known Member
Clinical in the sense they took the few chances they had and we didn't take one of the 20 odd we had
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top