I read this as our top 100 signings (of all time) and nearly fell of my seat!
I was so angry I didn't even bother to open it.My head nearly fell off I was so angry when I first read it.
Reda higher than Armstrong and Murphy.[emoji23
I didn't particularly like Lewis Page (90) but hr should be higher than the likes of Yakubu, Ramage, etc.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Indeed! I'd forgot half of the crap we had aswell. Got to agree though that from the recent years Leon Clarke has to be up there.It really goes to show the shite we have had through the door over the last 5-10 years!
What time frame is this over? It is rubbish.
Not just rubbish; illiterate too.What time frame is this over? It is rubbish.
Fleck should not be in that top 3.
Without doubt the top 3 should consist of Armstrong, Clarke and McGoldrick.
It’s our last 100 signings before this summer.What time frame is this over? It is rubbish.
Think it could have stretched to 200 and most would have been inadequate.It’s our last 100 signings before this summer.
It’s our last 100 signings before this summer.
Disagree, Fleck was a brilliant and under appreciated player. Definitely in the top 3 considering the 3 players you listed were only here for a year as well.
But it seems to be that only strikers get credit theses days, shown by the Ballon d’or, only great attackers get appreciated.
LOLFleck was rubbish for two of the seasons - under robbins in our most successful period of this era he was s bit part and even second fiddle to Jennings.
LOL
Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk
I was referring to the bit about Fleck being rubbish for two seasons.So Jennings didn’t keep him out the team?
I was referring to the bit about Fleck being rubbish for two seasons.
Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk
OK
Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk
So Jennings didn’t keep him out the team?
Hadn't realised he was meant to be a striker. Maybe he didn't either.He had an allergy in either penalty area. His goal scoring record was pethetic, his set pieces were poor and his assists contribution mediocre. Perhaps you’d like to actually put a case as to why is contribution was better than Clarke, mcgoldrick and Armstrong?
Disagree, Fleck was a brilliant and under appreciated player. Definitely in the top 3 considering the 3 players you listed were only here for a year as well.
But it seems to be that only strikers get credit theses days, shown by the Ballon d’or, only great attackers get appreciated.
Fleck had too many bad games to be in the top 3.
Out of interest, who do you drop from the top 3 in place of Fleck?
Armstrong- he was brilliant for half a season, people seem to forget he only scored 4 goals in the second half of the season.
Now before I get shot down, he was a brilliant signing, really liked him. But think fleck is underestimated by many. No surprise that he is shining at Sheffield United, and is ever present for them.
Agree fleck had bad games, first season he was very hit and miss. Probably one good game in 4.
However after that, especially during the sixfields and TM season, he was our most consistent player.
Fleck was poor that second half of the season, as was the rest of the midfield. Armstrong can be forgiven for his lack of goals.
Fleck was best at Sixfields. Ran the show that season.
Armstrong can be forgiven? But fleck can’t? Fleck was running the midfield by himself except for the TM season where he finally had a good partner on vincelot.
The problem was the forwards in TM’s season, understandably Armstrong and Murphy both burnt out. And hunt, fortune, Henderson, were all crap.
Fleck was pretty consistent for us.
Clarke and mcgoldrick, scored goals to drag us back into games, when we needed them. Armstrong, was very good, but seemed to get his goals in batches, and when we were playing well. Clarke and mcgoldrick scored when we didn’t play well.
Armstrong wasn't given much during that second half of the season, that is what I am saying.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?