Grendel
Well-Known Member
So you’d take a risk? I have seen none of the game against Ipswich but from what I have seen I’d avoid playing him - he looks hopelessly out his depth.
Or evidence that he's not.
So you’d take a risk? I have seen none of the game against Ipswich but from what I have seen I’d avoid playing him - he looks hopelessly out his depth.
To be fair they’ve played very well this season already together for example vs QPR. Just need imo Rudoni to stay more central in the final thirdBit of an interesting issue torp n rudoni not playing well together bit like lamps n Gerrard 4 eng competing for same space maybe rotate em n let Eccles have a run
Hopelessly out of his depth is an exaggeration, he looks like a player not used to the speed of the league or our system, which is understandable when he's barely played in either.So you’d take a risk? I have seen none of the game against Ipswich but from what I have seen I’d avoid playing him - he looks hopelessly out his depth.
Release yourself from the "must win" shackles and all will be wellCan someone tell me all will be ok
Brau made some good tackles against Ipswich but then mostly gave the back straight back. Needs more work IMO
Like a lot of the CWR callers in fairnessCommenting on performances you didn’t even see is always a classic
Who EMC?Last time he didn’t play we lost to Wrexham
Charlton forum’s views seem to mirror those of most of the league ie ‘they got lucky at the start and it’s caught up with them’.
Some comments about xG too. It’s true we were over performing the number of goals scored against the xG but we were leading the xG table all along.Lucky for 23 games is about the stupidest take you can get.
Yeah, we luckily battered in loads of goals against almost everyone we played.Charlton forum’s views seem to mirror those of most of the league ie ‘they got lucky at the start and it’s caught up with them’.
Some comments about xG too. It’s true we were over performing the number of goals scored against the xG but we were leading the xG table all along.
Charlton forum’s views seem to mirror those of most of the league ie ‘they got lucky at the start and it’s caught up with them’.
Got that right, they’re not even worshipping at the right altar!More fucking idiots worshipping at the altar of XG.
Charlton forum’s views seem to mirror those of most of the league ie ‘they got lucky at the start and it’s caught up with them’.
Now is the best time to be playing us, no doubt on that. Though I would ask any side to do better from the same run of games and the same level of disruption.When you’re top or successful everyone starts hating. We’re past the stage of poor old coventry in the doldrums and Sisu as owners.
Don’t base it on what you’ve read on here about the Ipswich game. Some truly bizarre takes.So you’d take a risk? I have seen none of the game against Ipswich but from what I have seen I’d avoid playing him - he looks hopelessly out his depth.
He looked fine against Southampton played in a more advanced role.So you’d take a risk? I have seen none of the game against Ipswich but from what I have seen I’d avoid playing him - he looks hopelessly out his depth.
MilanWho EMC?
He scored the opener at Wrexham
He didn’t play at PNE eitherMilan
As would Bobby ThomasI actually agree but then it means dropping the only forward showing any kind of form in EMC. Maybe time to test my theory that EMC would make a decent striker.
No. EMC scored ( or are you referring to Milan not playing?)Milan
It was almost 442 at times when BTA was playing earlier in the season, he was more of second striker than a midfielderBecause we obviously need to ditch the system that has us 8 points clear at the top of the league
That would be my team tooI think we will see quite a few changes
Rushworth
KKH Thomas Kitch Bidwell
Grimes Torp Eccles
Tatsu Simms EMC
Referring to Milan not playingNo. EMC scored ( or are you referring to Milan not playing?)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?