Change all that is SKY BLUE? (1 Viewer)

Bobby Firenze said:

I've just waded through 10 pages of this, my jaw dropping lower with each car-crash of a page. Paxman posturing himself as the new Lawrence Llewelyn Bowen, Otis prematurely nailing his colours to the mast and then furiously backtracking.

Can someone make the Benny Hill soundtrack play to complete my joy, please?

Click to expand...

singers_pore said:

First things first. The most important thing for any new owner is to sort out the finances, buy the area, build strong links with the community and fans, install a dedicated and competent managerial team (both on an off the pitch).

If those structual changes are made I would have no problem with the new owner introducing more superficial changes as part of a rebranding exercise, e.g., less sky blue and more dark blue and white in the kit, new club song, etc. But there is no point making these superficial changes unless the underlying and substantive weaknesses in our business model are properly addressed.

I sympathize with what Paxman and Otis are saying as we definitely need a visionary leader (and someone willing to invest and lose a lot of money). But a simple change in kit colour will not on its own achieve anything other than to alienate a large percentage of our fan base.

Click to expand...

Otis said:

And I am certainly not saying just change the kit. Just thing we need to consider anything in trying to change this losing mentality.

Click to expand...

CCFC said:

Yea and the kit colour has nothing to do with our losing mentality.

Click to expand...