Championship thread 25/26! (53 Viewers)

Matt Grimes' Beard

Well-Known Member
We should be grateful not entitled.
Why?

You go to work (I assume), are you grateful that you get paid each month or are you entitled to it?

You buy something from amazon, are you grateful that they deliver it to you or are you entitled to it?

I'm not sure you understand what the word entitled means.

The word literally means to be awarded the title!! We win the title, we become entitled.

If you win more points than the other teams you should 100%, feel entitled.

Being entitled is not a negative, it's a product of success and people can feel it if they want.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Functionally, 5-4-1 and 3-4-3 are more or less the same formation…
Question Mark What GIF by MOODMAN
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
People getting attached to scenarios usually leads to dissapointment

Look at some of the forum on Saturday getting upset about a night out

Ipswich to miss out on automatics and not go up
Leicester to get relegated
Birmingham to lose every game
Us to get crowned champions and have a massive party against Wrexham, and then go and beat them, subsequently causing them to miss out on the playoffs

The problem is, there is a chance this could all happen!
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Ipswich to miss out on automatics and not go up
Leicester to get relegated
Birmingham to lose every game
Us to get crowned champions and have a massive party against Wrexham, and then go and beat them, subsequently causing them to miss out on the playoffs

The problem is, there is a chance this could all happen!
Football’s all about having stuff like this to drool over. We only live once, so dream away!
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
I can see how 3-4-3 in possession might easily drop to 5-4-1 out of possession. They're not functionally the same though??
You’ve explained it yourself because the defensive shape for 3-4-3 is 5-4-1… Likewise, the attacking shape for 5-4-1 will be 3-4-3. Generally speaking.

The difference is literally how further forward/back the wide players are depending on the flow of the game.
 

Calista

Well-Known Member
You’ve explained it yourself because the defensive shape for 3-4-3 is 5-4-1… Likewise, the attacking shape for 5-4-1 will be 3-4-3. Generally speaking.

The difference is literally how further forward/back the wide players are depending on the flow of the game.
Yeah, my only disagreement is that they aren't functionally the same otherwise the shape wouldn't change. Semantics I suppose.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Yeah, my only disagreement is that they aren't functionally the same otherwise the shape wouldn't change. Semantics I suppose.
It is semantics because the two shapes are functionally the same:
2 WBs
3 CBs
2 CMs
2 wide players
1 striker

The differences are tactical and situational. For example, wingers may drop deeper if protecting a lead to form a flatter line, vice versa if chasing a goal.

Frankly, formations are becoming less and less relevant because most systems operate v fluid shapes in attack, defence and game state.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
Yes, sorry I was looking at promotion odds which obviously includes playoffs. Changed slightly this morning but similar. Not being a betting person I'm not to up on these things. I still wouldn't be surprised if Millwall sneaked into 2nd though.
I think Ipswich will struggle because of their run of games. They've not been very good away and only have 2 home games left. They also have the hardest games remaining especially as they have Southampton away.

Millwall are a big price at 10/1 but Southampton are on an amazing run. If Millwall win all 4 games Southampton can't catch them. Southampton have the best form and Millwall have the easier games. Could go either way.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
It is semantics because the two shapes are functionally the same:
2 WBs
3 CBs
2 CMs
2 wide players
1 striker

The differences are tactical and situational. For example, wingers may drop deeper if protecting a lead to form a flatter line, vice versa if chasing a goal.

Frankly, formations are becoming less and less relevant because most systems operate v fluid shapes in attack, defence and game state.
teams including us these days have at least 3 different shapes in possession - a build up, a progression and a final phase shape
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
teams including us these days have at least 3 different shapes in possession - a build up, a progression and a final phase shape
Exactly, to that extent it’s not worth fixating too much on formations because there’s an increasing expectation that players are capable of attacking space and capable of filling in gaps across pitch.

It’s the same as when we defend, nominally, Rudoni pushed up to make it a 4-4-2 shape but we obviously don’t play 4-4-2 in possession.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
I'm in 2 minds about this to be honest.

1 - it's bad to see Chansiri still holding the club to ransom.

2 - This guy coming in knew that Chansiri was a major creditor and that he was owed 15 million. Every club in this position has had to pay creditors to exit administration or take the points deduction. If the new owner doesn't want to start on -15 then pay off the debt. Every other club in this situation has had to do it.

I think it's only a bit more difficult as the majority of the debt is owed to the former owner. If it was owed to a teachers' pension fund, then everyone would obviously be saying that they have to start on -15 next season, or it's not fair on anyone else. I do get why it's causing consternation though.

P.S. F Wednesday. Ground's a shithole, and I haven't forgiven a small minority of their fans after we played them a few years back with Kasey Palmer getting abused.
To be honest it would be better for them to drop directly to league two and start again there. Won't happen though.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
What people expect and what people want to happen aren’t always the same.
Of course but many fans clearly got unhappy when we didn't win and they couldn't celebrate down town on a Saturday night.

Of course it would have been nice but life don't always work out so no point getting down about it

I wanna see the trophy lift at home. It will be disappointing if it doesn't happen but I won't get too down about it and focus more on fact we will hopefully lift it full stop.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Of course but many fans clearly got unhappy when we didn't win and they couldn't celebrate down town on a Saturday night.

Of course it would have been nice but life don't always work out so no point getting down about it

I wanna see the trophy lift at home. It will be disappointing if it doesn't happen but I won't get too down about it and focus more on fact we will hopefully lift it full stop.
Happy to admit on Saturday I was really bothered by the big disconnect between what I wanted and expected, and what happened. I think disappointment over that is understandable.

On the other side though I got to watch a game with my dad which I haven’t been able to do much for years. It meant a lot for him to go anyway and that ultimately matters more than whatever the result is.
 

baldy

Well-Known Member
Happy to admit on Saturday I was really bothered by the big disconnect between what I wanted and expected, and what happened. I think disappointment over that is understandable.

On the other side though I got to watch a game with my dad which I haven’t been able to do much for years. It meant a lot for him to go anyway and that ultimately matters more than whatever the result is.

So you & your old man would've been happy if we'd have lost? Hmmm
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Hes saying going with his old man means more than the result. As someone who would love to go with his old man, even to watch us get arseholed 6-2 by Yeovil again, I fully understand.
Should have been more conscious of that actually, apologies.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top