Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
If you dont think its different, how come you keep sharing your hate about Steve Gibson, but are deepthroating Wrexham every chance you get
If you dont think its different, how come you keep sharing your hate about Steve Gibson, but are deepthroating Wrexham every chance you getIm interested how this differs from how their conduct is worse than other clubs who create equity shares?
Explain please
If you dont think its different, how come you keep sharing your hate about Steve Gibson, but are deepthroating Wrexham every chance you get
how is being bought by two Hollywood celebs who pimp you out for a Disney documentary genuine lmaoWrexham who have genuinely grown their commercial appeal
Each time they enter a new division they outspend nearly the entire division and pay massively over the odds to hoover up players. It's anti competitive and exacerbates the problems caused by disproportionate transfer fees and wages.Im interested how this differs from how their conduct is worse than other clubs who create equity shares?
Explain please
whst have Wrexham done wrong that Middlesbrough didn’t?
best argument so farTurned annoying Americans onto Championship football
SPELLING?!best argument so far
It's also being pushed as some sort of underdog story, which is utter bollocks.Each time they enter a new division they outspend nearly the entire division and pay massively over the odds to hoover up players. It's anti competitive and exacerbates the problems caused by disproportionate transfer fees and wages.
As a smaller point, it cheats clubs who don't have this advantage of the right to advance up the pyramid.
how is being bought by two Hollywood celebs who pimp you out for a Disney documentary genuine lmao
Nothing to do with Wrexham though is itPeople like Hollywood and it attracts customers. Roflcopter.
Just when I thought he couldnt get anymore cringe hes a 40 year old man saying Roflcopter!Nothing to do with Wrexham though is it
The founding of the Premier League is unrelated to the rules concerning club ownership and football finance. On the contrary, in a different timeline we have an abundance of TV money making its way through the pyramid with clubs that are still in the hands of their supporters. When we welcomed in Roman Abramovich that's when it really started to run away.
I see Wrexham coming up into this league and dropping £50 million and it reminds me of what the game in this country has turned into. Hero worship of piss taking clubs while we look at Sheffield Wednesday's mess (Lesta's too now) and ask 'how did this happen?'.
I think this is probably the root of my slight antipathy towards Wrexham. To make an exception of them for spending big would be ignoring precedent, can't say I dislike the owners particularly, Wrexham bandwaggoners will be bundled together with the others who partake in that particular distasteful practice and I hear they have brought the community along with them. There are some positives, but Wrexham are probably a net-negative overall for football, and Sky Sports painting it as some sort of fairy tale is nauseatingIt's also being pushed as some sort of underdog story, which is utter bollocks.
But it’s his money, he keeps funding it but doesn’t breach FFP, two different things, it allows them to spend at the upper end of the losses allowed compared to an owner like Doug who may want break even annually And therefore an advantage but no rules broken, just fortunate fansTbf to G it is a fact that Gibson has bankrolled Middlesbrough for the last 40 years. Their spending in the PL was pretty massive in the 90s, Juninho, Emerson, Ravanelli, Barmby etc
Yup, now retired and lives around here. He doesn’t ‘long for the second division’, he does feel the club has moved too far away from the one he grew up supporting.
To each his own, his opinion's as valid as anyone else's and he's seen pretty much everything in his time supporting the club.I hope we move that far away from the club I grew up supporting that we win a champions league
its a fairy tale for the fans who went thro shit owners and saw there team go out the leagueI think this is probably the root of my slight antipathy towards Wrexham. To make an exception of them for spending big would be ignoring precedent, can't say I dislike the owners particularly, Wrexham bandwaggoners will be bundled together with the others who partake in that particular distasteful practice and I hear they have brought the community along with them. There are some positives, but Wrexham are probably a net-negative overall for football, and Sky Sports painting it as some sort of fairy tale is nauseating
To each his own, his opinion's as valid as anyone else's and he's seen pretty much everything in his time supporting the club.
If we got bought out by the Saudis and were used for sportswashing I wouldn't give a fuck about sporting success, I'd stop following the club.
But that's the thing, isn't it.I hope we move that far away from the club I grew up supporting that we win a champions league
As I've said before to you on that topic, I want rid of their influence across society and our government, not just football.You are entitled to your opinion, and that's fair enough.
But Ive said this many times before, if we want to remove malign foreign influences from our society, (and that constitutes a minefield in itself), then great, I'm all for it.
But to use the Saudis that you've mentioned as an example, while they're getting the red carpet treatment at number 10, and afternoon tea with the monarchy, and Trump is excusing them murdeting Khashoggi by calling hima wrong un then why should a football team be the ones to try and set moral standards?
Brilliant for them to then stomp on the fairy tales of clubs who've also put up with shite for ages then.its a fairy tale for the fans who went thro shit owners and saw there team go out the league
I want rid of their influence across society and our government, not just football.
And that's fine. However trying to paint them as plucky little Wrexham who have battled their way from non league to within sight of the Premier league, sticks in the throat a bit. I mean they were paying L1 money in the conference.its a fairy tale for the fans who went thro shit owners and saw there team go out the league
But that's the thing, isn't it.
Winning the Champion's League would be great, but would it be worth becoming a sports-washing tool for an illiberal regime to achieve it? Imo, no. That may put me in the minority, but it's still a no from me.
A historic injustice doesn't justify the actions of a club, romanticised by Sky Sports, to the detriment of others and the sport, though?its a fairy tale for the fans who went thro shit owners and saw there team go out the league
Nobody is making an exception of them FFS.But, to keep honest to my original point, it's only the media narrative I am in some sense "attacking". Wrexham is just a symptom of a wider systemic disease, and making an exception out of them would be harsh in the grand scheme of things.
I don't know.And what are the parameters for acceptable ownership?
Have they been painted as that though? That night just be in angry peoples heads?And that's fine. However trying to paint them as plucky little Wrexham who have battled their way from non league to within sight of the Premier league, sticks in the throat a bit. I mean they were paying L1 money in the conference.
They could also be doing a Chelsea so Sheaf at 6m on a 4 year deal would only cost 1.5m per annum, the Doyle deal had a buy back clause at the same value so not sure they would have to amortise his value through the books.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?