Championship Goals Record (2 Viewers)

Forums New posts
DT-R

DT-R

Well-Known Member
So, im comparing the 3 highest Championship goal tallies, all over 100+. All 3 teams obviously went up in their respective season as champions also.

Bolton with 100 in 1996/97 season

Fulham with 106 in 2021/22 season

Man City with 108 in 2001/02 season.

Whilst I dont think we've got a Mitrovic type/42 goal scorer, we have got goals going in from all over the pitch. I've looked at all 3 after 9 rounds. They are as follows:

Bolton 22:12
Fulham 19:8
Man City 24:16

Us, 27:7. So, not only are we outscoring the 3 highest so far, we're also out defending them, too.
f3cd6091bf5b607accc1b1caecc82fcf.jpg
cd3a089227d9fcc716235d48167e3dfe.jpg
610da44431efc1b18eec2c810da05d7e.jpg


Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
DT-R

DT-R

Well-Known Member
More for my own enjoyment and interests, really, I'm going to update monthly on the 3 teams mentioned, and I'm also going to add Leeds and Burnley in from last season.

I will compare where they were at the end of each month/game round, to see what we need to do in that month to keep pace with them. If we can keep pace with Leeds from last year and 3 Champions with the highest goal records, then we should be looking good.

As of October 31st (our next 4 games and ending this month) will be the end of round 13. I will look at what we need in terms of goals and points to be in line with those teams at the same point of their respective season.

Granted, every season is different, and some seasons, 80 points, have won a title, and others, 80 points wouldn't get you in the play-offs. So it's all relative. But just as a guide. If we can try and keep up with the 3 most prolific scoring goals teams and 2, 100-point teams, we are heading in the right direction.

You dont have to look or like or interact. Like I say, im doing it more for my own interests. And if you youre interested, it's here. If not, scroll on.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
DT-R

DT-R

Well-Known Member
So the next 4 games take us to round 13. I'll list the 5 teams on Points, GF:GA, and league position.

I will list them in order of lowest scorers first, to highest points last.

Bolton
Fulham
Man City
Burnley
Leeds

I will then discuss what we need to do in our next group of games, points and goals wise, and what results we are likely to need to keep the pace with the pace setters.

So after 13 games, in each respective season, each team looked like this:

Bolton: Points 30, - 28:14. 1st

Fulham: Points 26, - 29:14. 2nd

Many City. Points 23, - 32:24. 6th

Burnley. Points 23, - 17:6. 4th

Leeds. Points 26, - 22:8. 2nd

Average points tally of 25.6 points. Median of 26.
Average GF also 25.6
Average GA is 13.2


So to be average amongst the group, 7 points from the next 4 games will keep us there or there abouts with these teams. 2 wins, 1 draw from 4 games.

In terms of GF, we're already well above the average with 4 games still to play.As longg as we dont concede more than 6 goals in the next 4 games, we should be well below the average for GA as welll.

In terms of being above average, to keep up with Boltons points, tally, we need 11 points from a possible 12. So, 4 wins from 4. Not as doable, but this certainly would see us way above average.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
DT-R

DT-R

Well-Known Member
DT-R said:
So the next 4 games take us to round 13. I'll list the 5 teams on Points, GF:GA, and league position.

I will list them in order of lowest scorers first, to highest points last.

Bolton
Fulham
Man City
Burnley
Leeds

I will then discuss what we need to do in our next group of games, points and goals wise, and what results we are likely to need to keep the pace with the pace setters.

So after 13 games, in each respective season, each team looked like this:

Bolton: Points 30, - 28:14. 1st

Fulham: Points 26, - 29:14. 2nd

Many City. Points 23, - 32:24. 6th

Burnley. Points 23, - 17:6. 4th

Leeds. Points 26, - 22:8. 2nd

Average points tally of 25.6 points. Median of 26.
Average GF also 25.6
Average GA is 13.2


So to be average amongst the group, 7 points from the next 4 games will keep us there or there abouts with these teams. 2 wins, 1 draw from 4 games.

In terms of GF, we're already well above the average with 4 games still to play.As longg as we dont concede more than 6 goals in the next 4 games, we should be well below the average for GA as welll.

In terms of being above average, to keep up with Boltons points, tally, we need 11 points from a possible 12. So, 4 wins from 4. Not as doable, but this certainly would see us way above average.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
So with a game still to play, we're ahead on points on all bar Bolton who had 30 points after 13 games (we've still got 3 points available) and ahead of everyone on GF, with Man City being the highest on 32, were already on 34 with another game to go. Looking good so far against this.

Will update on Saturday/Sunday with next month's games taking us up to round 18.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
DT-R

DT-R

Well-Known Member
DT-R said:
So the next 4 games take us to round 13. I'll list the 5 teams on Points, GF:GA, and league position.

I will list them in order of lowest scorers first, to highest points last.

Bolton
Fulham
Man City
Burnley
Leeds

I will then discuss what we need to do in our next group of games, points and goals wise, and what results we are likely to need to keep the pace with the pace setters.

So after 13 games, in each respective season, each team looked like this:

Bolton: Points 30, - 28:14. 1st

Fulham: Points 26, - 29:14. 2nd

Many City. Points 23, - 32:24. 6th

Burnley. Points 23, - 17:6. 4th

Leeds. Points 26, - 22:8. 2nd

Average points tally of 25.6 points. Median of 26.
Average GF also 25.6
Average GA is 13.2


So to be average amongst the group, 7 points from the next 4 games will keep us there or there abouts with these teams. 2 wins, 1 draw from 4 games.

In terms of GF, we're already well above the average with 4 games still to play.As longg as we dont concede more than 6 goals in the next 4 games, we should be well below the average for GA as welll.

In terms of being above average, to keep up with Boltons points, tally, we need 11 points from a possible 12. So, 4 wins from 4. Not as doable, but this certainly would see us way above average.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
So round 13 done.
We arent the highest points tally from all the above clubs, with Bolton being on 30 whilst we're 2 points short on 28. But we are above everyone else and above the average of 25.6 points.

Elsewhere, we are the highest scorers on 36 with City in 2001/02 being closest with 32 goals scored. And way above the average of 25.6.

GA we're actually above all 3 of the scoring record teams, but way behind on the 2, 100point teams from last season. Though still under the average of 13.6 with 12 goals conceded.

October done, now to November and the 5 games taking us up to round 18.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
DT-R

DT-R

Well-Known Member
Round 18 next then! Let's see where everyone else was at that point, what points they had, what GD they had, and what likely outcome we are likely to need to keep pace again with them.

Bolton: Pts 38, 38:23. 1st

Fulham: Pts 41, 48:15. 1st

Man City: Pts 33, 45:28. 3rd

Burnley: Pts 38, 23:6. 2nd

Leeds: Pts 35, 31:13. 3rd


Average points total of 37.
Average goals for of 37.
Average goals against of 17.

So to be above Fulhams points total of 41 we need to be looking at 13points from a possible 15 available. 4 wins and 1 draw with no losses!
To keep up with the average of 37 we need 9 points. 3 wins 2 losses? Or 2 wins and 3 draws?

For goals for, to be top of the pile we need 48 goals. So 12 more than we currently have.
We're already on 36 so the average of 37 is achievable.... Just about

Though I think 4 wins and 1 draw is a very tough ask, especially considering the teams we're facing, I do think to keep up with average points total is very achievable. 2 wins and 3 draws. Let's smash it! If we can end the round with 37 points, when considering Burnley and Leeds had 38 and 35 at the same stage last season and both went on to 100points, is a very, very good return! And achievable.



Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
DT-R

DT-R

Well-Known Member
With 2 games left to play in the block, we're 5 goals and 4 points short of Fulhams total who were highest points and scorers after round 18.

We're already ahead of Leeds and City's points and only 1 point off the other 2.

Only City and Fulham can better our goals for by round 18 end.

Looking very good.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
Gynnsthetonic

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
DT-R said:
With 2 games left to play in the block, we're 5 goals and 4 points short of Fulhams total who were highest points and scorers after round 18.

We're already ahead of Leeds and City's points and only 1 point off the other 2.

Only City and Fulham can better our goals for by round 18 end.

Looking very good.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
City?
 
skybluelee

skybluelee

Well-Known Member
DT-R said:
Yeah, as the only "City" on the list, I didn't think I needed to specify which City it was!

Or were you confused and thought I was talking about Bolton City FC?

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Calling Birmingham 'Blues' is almost as vomit inducing, yet pretty much everyone on here seems to call them that.
 
Robinshio

Robinshio

Well-Known Member
skybluelee said:
It’s over-familiar. We're not Birmingham fans. What about all the other Blues?

We're not United either but I hate it when people refer to Manchester United as that too. What about all the other Uniteds?!

I'm perfectly happy to be in a minority of 1 on this issue. 😎
Click to expand...
What about Villa (do you call them their full name) Spurs etc Happy to be referred to as the Sky Blues by outsiders
 
Mucca Mad Boys

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
skybluelee said:
It’s over-familiar. We're not Birmingham fans. What about all the other Blues?

We're not United either but I hate it when people refer to Manchester United as that too. What about all the other Uniteds?!

I'm perfectly happy to be in a minority of 1 on this issue. 😎
Click to expand...
Is it? It’s shorter and easier to say Blues than Birmingham. It’s also their nickname whereas I’m not aware of any others using ‘blues’ in the EFL.

I can. Tottenham Hotspur ‘Spurs’, WBA ‘Baggies’, Aston Villa ‘Villa’ as well as calling Birmingham ‘Blues’. It’s not over familiarity but when typing or speaking, it’s easier.
 
skybluelee

skybluelee

Well-Known Member
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Is it? It’s shorter and easier to say Blues than Birmingham. It’s also their nickname whereas I’m not aware of any others using ‘blues’ in the EFL.

I can. Tottenham Hotspur ‘Spurs’, WBA ‘Baggies’, Aston Villa ‘Villa’ as well as calling Birmingham ‘Blues’. It’s not over familiarity but when typing or speaking, it’s easier.
Click to expand...
Chelsea are Blues. Villa and Spurs are shortened versions of their full names and the only teams known by those shortened terms.

WBA - Baggies, too familiar. Vomit inducing.
 
Last edited:
DT-R

DT-R

Well-Known Member
Just 1 point and 1 goal to be level with Fulhams points and goals. And id say of the block, Charlton at home certainly looked the easiest fixture of the month on paper.
A 2-0 win to be 2 points higher and 1 goal higher than the best would be phenomenal. It would also be another 9 point 3 game week.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
DT-R

DT-R

Well-Known Member
DT-R said:
Round 18 next then! Let's see where everyone else was at that point, what points they had, what GD they had, and what likely outcome we are likely to need to keep pace again with them.

Bolton: Pts 38, 38:23. 1st

Fulham: Pts 41, 48:15. 1st

Man City: Pts 33, 45:28. 3rd

Burnley: Pts 38, 23:6. 2nd

Leeds: Pts 35, 31:13. 3rd


Average points total of 37.
Average goals for of 37.
Average goals against of 17.

So to be above Fulhams points total of 41 we need to be looking at 13points from a possible 15 available. 4 wins and 1 draw with no losses!
To keep up with the average of 37 we need 9 points. 3 wins 2 losses? Or 2 wins and 3 draws?

For goals for, to be top of the pile we need 48 goals. So 12 more than we currently have.
We're already on 36 so the average of 37 is achievable.... Just about

Though I think 4 wins and 1 draw is a very tough ask, especially considering the teams we're facing, I do think to keep up with average points total is very achievable. 2 wins and 3 draws. Let's smash it! If we can end the round with 37 points, when considering Burnley and Leeds had 38 and 35 at the same stage last season and both went on to 100points, is a very, very good return! And achievable.



Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Well well well! Who'd of thought it possible? We're 2 points better off than Fulhams best and 2 goals better too! Fantastic! And 50 goals up with less half the season played. Another 58 goals to beat Man City's record. Thats 2.2 goals per game.

Anyway, on to the month of December and the round of 24. Ill have a look at numbers tomorrow, but im going to add a new team too. This started as a goals record thread, comparing us to the 3 highest scoring season records. I soon added Leeds and Burnley from last season as a barometer for promotion chamces. But the way its going, who says we cant beat Readings 2005/06 Championship record 106 point season? So i will be adding them in to the mix too. They were, after all, at Round 18 on 41 points with 30:10

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
Boicey

Boicey

Well-Known Member
From the BBC Cov: Charlton match report

"No side at this stage of the campaign has scored 50 goals since Sheffield Wednesday in 1958-59 and Middlesbrough's second-tier record of 122 goals almost a century ago could also be under threat"
 
blunted

blunted

Well-Known Member
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Is it? It’s shorter and easier to say Blues than Birmingham. It’s also their nickname whereas I’m not aware of any others using ‘blues’ in the EFL.

I can. Tottenham Hotspur ‘Spurs’, WBA ‘Baggies’, Aston Villa ‘Villa’ as well as calling Birmingham ‘Blues’. It’s not over familiarity but when typing or speaking, it’s easier.
Click to expand...
I thought Villa had to be preceded by shit on the
 
S

SkyBluePower

Well-Known Member
Torquay Sky Blue said:
My mates a Man City fan and he refers to them as City or the Sky Blues because he knows it annoys the fuck out of me. I'm triggered just thinking about it.
Click to expand...

I think calling Man City “City” if you are a fan of them is entirely correct - it’s always been City or United up there.

Calling them the Sky Blues can fuck right off though. They ain’t having that.
 
Flying Fokker

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
skybluelee said:
Chelsea are Blues. Villa and Spurs are shortened versions of their full names and the only teams known by those shortened terms.

WBA - Baggies, too familiar. Vomit inducing.
Click to expand...
Just wondering? Do you react when commentators refer to Man City as Sky Blues. It happens occasionally. That makes my blood boil.

Edit: Ha, didn’t scroll down the list before posting…..Hope that’s not wound anyone up?
 
skybluelee

skybluelee

Well-Known Member
Flying Fokker said:
Just wondering? Do you react when commentators refer to Man City as Sky Blues. It happens occasionally. That makes my blood boil.

Edit: Ha, didn’t scroll down the list before posting…..Hope that’s not wound anyone up?
Click to expand...
More than you could ever possibly imagine, my friend!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 1, guests: 2)
Top