So why did you say is Tim Fusher under investigation. (See above)? The article by mentioning his name must have drawn you to conclude this surely?
Grendull. You're clearly looking for a fight tonight. Take it elsewhere I'm not biting.
I think that Grendel Is saying that Simon has Inferred the connection.
I think that Grendel Is saying that Simon has Inferred the connection.
TBF it could go back years but let's be honest here some are better at hiding it then others.So why did you say is Tim Fusher under investigation. (See above)? The article by mentioning his name must have drawn you to conclude this surely?
Correct.
:thinking about::facepalm: :guitar2:
Might have been a better idea to ask Simon then instead of me. Like Wingy did.
mCoventry City FC Ltd administrator has charged over £444k to date. http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-liquidator-charged-over-8105978
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No but that's what your hoping.Well no because you clearly made the association from the article. - when Robno says it wasn't him you said it doesn't say it isn't. So you were clear drawn to a conclusion from what you read.
If the paragraph below had said Mile mcginnity the only director then you wouldn't have said Tim fisher would you? (Not that I am inferring its mcginnity by the way)
No but that's what your hoping.
The mcginnity bit.
AhI don't know why you'd think that.
I think we all have a fairly good idea who it is and it's not him.
Don't spoil it I am sure that nothing will come of it anyway.
One thing I do know can't pin it on me this time.
Or Ken?FFS just ask Rob S he's bound to know
Or Ken?
Rob will ask him
So how much have SISU paid out on fees for this and the JR roughly?
The liquidator will investigate the conduct of all the directors going back for at least 2 years. The liquidator is an officer of the court and can decide who merits investigation and the time period to be covered based on the information he has received already
A report to the relevant government department is not necessarily evidence of wrong doing so we should not jump to any conclusions.
Does anyone really think an investigation by Appleton, who was appointed by SISU and couldn't even work out who owned what, is going to show Fisher, or anyone else from SISU, in a bad light?
IF, IF something dodgy has gone on and Appleton is an officer of the court surely he would have to report it by law or he would be breaking the law himself?
Like has already been highlighted though the report could just say nothing dodgy has gone on, no further action required.
Chief Dave - you're very keen on transparency yet completely ignore the fact that the local council made the decision to borrow 14m to lend to a private company but didn't record minutes or notes.
IF, IF something dodgy has gone on and Appleton is an officer of the court surely he would have to report it by law or he would be breaking the law himself?
Like has already been highlighted though the report could just say nothing dodgy has gone on, no further action required.
Does this mean he could be hero worshiped on this forum very soon?
I said this all along in relation to the administration. When the CVA was rejected the parties that did so should have pushed for the process to be looked at in terms of legal process.
If they did that - then we are in a situation where no wrong doing was found (morally - well that may be a different story).
If they did not pursue it - then there can be no justification of it's rejection.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?