So when they've sold all the players that are worth anything, how will we pay our way then? When we are bottom of L2 and still paying Championship rent, there won't be anyone who fetches enough to cover the rent...I'd be surprised if the sell on fee is any more than 10-15% of any profit we make, probably about 100-150k?
Sorry mate, if they've cut costs so much, why do they need to do this, unless it's simple asset stripping? It's what these firms do when they can't see any other way to make money!
I didn't say it was a good plan!
You know we're both on roughly the same page WRT SISU, but this is just a conspiracy theory. Hate them for what they do, not the story that's been made up, it makes you (us) more credible.
SISU won't take any money out from this, and if they do it won't make any difference anyway. They'll want the £30m back eventually.
As has been shown above, the cash from this just about runs the club for 6 weeks. SISU said at the start of the season (through Orange Ken) that they basically are done with City and they have to pay their own way.
The real head scratcher is exactly the question you posed: Why? I've yet to see a reasonable answer here. If they don't want to put any more cash in, and we all know we won't break even next year in L1, then why not just sell up?
Curiouser and curiouser...