The taxpayer isn't affected by the arrangement. It's an irrelevant red herring.
Many council funded stadium allow football clubs to reside in them for much lower rents. The argument they have signed so cough up also does not hold up to scrutiny. Commercial contracts are ripped up and resigned all the time.
What really annoys me is people like you call yourself a supporter but are quite happy for the club to start with a huge handicap compared to their opponents -- namely a rent which equates to over 20% of its turnover. When the club started playing there they had to have 22,000 paying adults to break even. It is ridiculous and your stance reveals you as not a supporter at all. You must be an ACL plant -- it is the only logical explanation for writing such nonsense.
Grendel you keep forgetting whose fault it is that turnover is so low! CCFC, not ACL. They haven't broken the deal, City have. I am a City supporter, but that doesn't mean that I want our club to behave so dishonourably.
I am ashamed to be a City fan, not just because of the way our owners behave, but because of people like you. You make me sick.
I am ashamed to be a City fan, not just because of the way our owners behave, but because of people like you. You make me sick.
Wait a minute, if you are struggling to pay your mortgage, can you go into the bank and ask to restructure? Is this the Banks fault that you are struggling? It's not, but they are still open to talks and possibly payment holidays. If ACL would give CCFC a lower rent until we achieve promotion surely this is no different?
What has that got to do with someone calling people sheep because they are only complaining now TF has mentioned it?
exactly right if that is what sisu are sayingWait a minute, if you are struggling to pay your mortgage, can you go into the bank and ask to restructure? Is this the Banks fault that you are struggling? It's not, but they are still open to talks and possibly payment holidays. If ACL would give CCFC a lower rent until we achieve promotion surely this is no different?
But we don't have a mortgage.
If I become unable to pay the rent on my flat because of my own failings at work, which get me demoted, can I ask my landlord for a 90% reduction in rent? No, he'd tell me to pay up or pack my bags. Rightly so.
And an outraged taxpayer. My, you are a crotchety boy.
Oh because of course the money that the council put into the stadium project came out of the sky didn't it? Yes, as someone who contributes to a local authority, to see that local authority's investment being treated with disdain and ingratitude by CCFC is an embarrassment. We are getting near Pompey territory in terms of riding roughshod over our agreements.
I want to see ACL force us out. There is no viable alternative ground - SISU will have to come back with their tail between their legs and hopefully pay up.
I think if you discovered your greedy landlord was charging you 10 times the price of your neighbour you may be a tad disappointed.
I think you'll find that £1.2m p/a for a Premier League club is a perfectly reasonable rent. Yes, were' in L1 with a PL facility, but that's hardly ACL's fault is it?
If our home ground was Boundary Park, I would agree with you 100%. If the club were happy to pay £5m per year in rent if we get to the Prem, I would agree with you 100%. But you can't have it both ways.
Remind me how many PL games the RICOH has hosted... Hmmmmmm :thinking about:
Ipswich have a PL venue, they pay 30k p/y Hull have, they pay 5k p/y, Swansea & Ospreys haven't techinically paid any rent, Donny pay 100k for good stadium, possibly PL standard.
You're wrong on so many levels.
Wait a minute, if you are struggling to pay your mortgage, can you go into the bank and ask to restructure? Is this the Banks fault that you are struggling? It's not, but they are still open to talks and possibly payment holidays. If ACL would give CCFC a lower rent until we achieve promotion surely this is no different?
Acl's current offer is massivly massivly more generous than the bank you mention in your analogy.
I think if you discovered your greedy landlord was charging you 10 times the price of your neighbour you may be a tad disappointed.
What the bank that will offer 12months with no payments and extend the mortgage by that amount?
Sisu have taken an unauthorised 12 month payment holiday, ACL have offered to lower the "mortgage" by 2/3rd's, have given 10 years to pay off the missed payments and thrown in some massive freebies. You arn't getting a bank that resonable anywhere.
I want to pay the minimum amount of rent as much as any City fan and I'm biased towards our club like we all are but I don't see how any reasonable person can look at ACL's offer and SISU's actions and not conclude that ACL are unbeliveably reasonable and SISU are acting completely unacceptably.
Sisu have taken an unauthorised 12 month payment holiday, ACL have offered to lower the "mortgage" by 2/3rd's, have given 10 years to pay off the missed payments and thrown in some massive freebies. You arn't getting a bank that resonable anywhere.
I want to pay the minimum amount of rent as much as any City fan and I'm biased towards our club like we all are but I don't see how any reasonable person can look at ACL's offer and SISU's actions and not conclude that ACL are unbeliveably reasonable and SISU are acting completely unacceptably.
I hope ACL enforce their original contract and make CCFC pay every single penny - as a taxpayer I am outraged that ACL (part owned by the council) compromised when there was no reason to do so.
For a stadium like the Ricoh, the current rent is perfectly reasonable - it's not ACL's fault that we are in League One instead of the Premier, so why should they take the hit for the incompetence of CCFC's owners? When SISU came in, they agreed to the current rent as it wasn't unaffordable given their plans - they just didn't bank on failure. Now they want to be baled out by others.
What really annoys me is how some people like Grendel and Sky Blue Taylor are so hard-headed that they can't see past the CCFC perspective. Yes, of course a rent reduction would be good for CCFC given our lowly status, but variable rent (based on league position) wasn't part of the deal when SISU signed up to it - precisely because they knew that in the Premier League, their ultimate goal within the business plan, £1.2m p/a is chicken feed. Would SISU be happy to pay, say, £5m per year in rent if we get to the Premier? Don't make me laugh.
As a taxpayer and someone who just hates bullies generally, I want to see ACL enforce the terms of its contract against CCFC.
Aren't the facts that in 2005, CCFC in the form of Robinson, Fletcher et al signed up to the deal at the Ricoh including the rent payments. When SISU arrived in town, they must have sanctioned the level of rent as part of the due diligence process. Did anyone hold a gun to their head to do so?
I'm sure they thought promotion to the PL was something of a formality and an annual rent of £1.2M would not have been such an issue, and the thought of languishing in the Championship or worse still, relegation to League 1 never entered their heads or business plan. Now they find that the maths don't add up and are scraping the barrel to find any excuse for not honouring their commitment. CCFC have been shafted for years by a succession of incompetents at board level.
You just supported my argument.
SISU didn't sign the deal, the morons before did.
Would SISU be happy to pay 5m in the prem? No, I wouldn't either, Man C pay 3m for a lot better stadium. 1.28 is premiership rent, we're not in the premiership.
Bully tactics? I think ACL proposing to wind us up are the bullies here, we cant afford their rent, so we dont pay.
Wow, just wowOh because of course the money that the council put into the stadium project came out of the sky didn't it? Yes, as someone who contributes to a local authority, to see that local authority's investment being treated with disdain and ingratitude by CCFC is an embarrassment. We are getting near Pompey territory in terms of riding roughshod over our agreements.
I want to see ACL force us out. There is no viable alternative ground - SISU will have to come back with their tail between their legs and hopefully pay up.
Maybe that should have challenged it before. I fail to see why that prevents them doing so now. Most council backed stadiums allow the football club to play for a nominal fee. We are the exception not the rule.
It will unless it is resolved finish the club. It I'd staggering that this stance gets the support of some supporters.
Problem is SBT that it was TF, and TF alone, who made this decision back in April. A few months later ACL offer to halve the rent-still not good enough for TF, so he keeps withholding and racking up a whopping great bill; and when ACL offer a £800k reduction, freebies, and a 10 year repayment timeframe for the outstanding rent he accumulated, he still refuses. If the club is sent to the cleaners it is that man I will hold personally accountable.
I want to see ACL force us out. There is no viable alternative ground - SISU will have to come back with their tail between their legs and hopefully pay up.
Oh because of course the money that the council put into the stadium project came out of the sky didn't it? Yes, as someone who contributes to a local authority, to see that local authority's investment being treated with disdain and ingratitude by CCFC is an embarrassment. We are getting near Pompey territory in terms of riding roughshod over our agreements.
I want to see ACL force us out. There is no viable alternative ground - SISU will have to come back with their tail between their legs and hopefully pay up.
What were people saying when we were offered half rent? Take it, were they wrong? Yes. We get offered 67% reduction, looks good yes, is still too much? Yes, will we get an even better deal from ACL? Most likely I think. Will you and your faction look like fools in the event of that happening!? Yes.
I'm very confident we will get a deal that will favour CCFC.
Maybe I'm immune to it now but the number of people who want the club they support to be put out of business should really amaze me. You're another one.
Truly shocking attitude.
Crucial difference is Torch that most of us just want to see the club act responsibly-until today though I didn't actually think a few people wanted to force the club out. I stand corrected.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?