If Sisu cannot match Mark Robins demands and are not providing him with what was promised when he signed, then YES they are to blame.
If Sisu cannot match Mark Robins demands and are not providing him with what was promised when he signed, then YES they are to blame.
They can't reasonably be blamed, but why let reason get in the way of a good old SISU bashing?
Surely they met his demands else he wouldnt have joined?
I'm sure many white lies are told to potential managers at interviews!
Wasn't Chris Coleman once talking about bringing in lots of Spanish players straight after appointment?
Even I can't blame Waggott for this one...
I understand if they promised him lots of money to spend but i meant personal demands!
Surely they met his demands else he wouldnt have joined?
They shouldn't have agreed to the release clause. Very short-sighted. If that meant we didn't get him in the first place, fine, we'll look elsewhere in favour of more sustained success than that offered by somebody who was bound to get snapped of up he did well. 4 managers in a season, that's really beneficial to the club!
The size of any clause would be interesting. How much is promotion to The Championship worth? £4 to £5m? If so, £100K does appear short sighted. That stated, he may not have agreed to join without it. Rather like Ba at Newcastle
If Robins was promised transfer money in Jan and it didn't happen that could explain his change of heart.
They shouldn't have agreed to the release clause. Very short-sighted. If that meant we didn't get him in the first place, fine, we'll look elsewhere in favour of more sustained success than that offered by somebody who was bound to get snapped of up he did well. 4 managers in a season, that's really beneficial to the club!
It's all about the Money, if Huddersfield compensate us, Sisu will not say No.... It's all about the .
AS the best candidate though, should we not have given him the chance even though the judas got the claus in his contract.
Still it wont stop the SISU sentiment will it.
Yes we can blame SISU.
He wanted two players in transfer and told he would get them if he off loaded some money. Then told he could not have them.
Sorry but SISU are to blame.
We turned down an approach that would've obviously had compo attached, so they weren't short-sighted, they had a long term plan, with MR in charge.
Ironic because at the start of the day, it was 'SISU's fault' now it's clear that MR wants the job, what a turnaround and stab in the back!
I hope he does shit, gets sacked quickly and struggles to get a job in a long time.
AS the best candidate though, should we not have given him the chance even though the judas got the claus in his contract.
Still it wont stop the SISU sentiment will it.
You don't want to hear Mark Robins side of the story first then? You just want to draw the conclusion that this is all down to him?
Sent from my KIS using Tapatalk 2
Yes we can blame SISU.
He wanted two players in transfer and told he would get them if he off loaded some money. Then told he could not have them.
Sorry but SISU are to blame.
They shouldn't have agreed to the release clause. Very short-sighted. If that meant we didn't get him in the first place, fine, we'll look elsewhere in favour of more sustained success than that offered by somebody who was bound to get snapped of up he did well. 4 managers in a season, that's really beneficial to the club!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?