8000-10000 people on sunday all thought the same!!
Here's a thought, and I realise it might seem outrageous, but maybe people don't all think the same way as you do.
It is beyond me how anyone could even begin to try and say Sisu had any worth, any credit, any truth at all. Just lie after lie.
The League are worst than hopeless.
I had another standard reply today from Adam Pomfrett. I'd written to Greg Clark, posted it. & enclosed Adrian Durham's article from The Daily Mail two weeks ago.
Politely I outlined about ten basic points where Sisu had and still were contravening League rules.
Their reply was basically, we can't interfere.
I really despair.
And people on here, I don't know whether they are being wilfully contrary and looking to wind people up, actually give credence to Fisher.
ACL have tried and tried. They haven't been paid. They dropped the rent, again and then again. And still people want them to hand over the ground to a bunch of crooks?
A bunch of crooks who have taken our team from us. Unbelievable.
8000-10000 people on sunday all thought the same!!
Here's a thought, and I realise it might seem outrageous, but maybe people don't all think the same way as you do.
8000-10000 people on sunday all thought the same!!
Here's a thought. The words thought and Spion Kop are not natural bedfellows.Here's a thought, I think you'll find an awful lot of people do think like Spionkop & I'm one of them
interesting how the FL are having a go at ACL but forgetting to mention HMRC!!!
They were irrelevant so why mention them?
Not really irrelevant when they are talking about the actions of ACL in not signing the CVA has caused the situation..HMRC also did not sign the CVA. If ACL had signed the CVA it still would have been vetoed by HMRC's refusal to sign.
Hmm, somewhat reductivist.
Yes, unlikely to be literally true, however as a general guide to the general views of the generality of people there - generally true.
Really?
Yes, unlikely to be literally true, however as a general guide to the general views of the generality of people there - generally true.
It would be nice to just sell everything to one owner and get rid of ACL and SISU and clear the air a bit wouldn't it
I would suggest it depends which part you decide on however.
Reports back, reports at the time, speaking to people who were there, it does seem the prevailing mood would be a positive assertion of Coventry in Coventry.
Beyond that, things get a little more complex.
It is of course why divisions get greater and greater on this site and others however, the desire to categorise and paint into exact corners, the desire to descend to petty bickering as opposed to seeking out the common ground.
The specific views of those I spoke to (a small sample to be fair)
My understanding was that HMRC was also a major ( not as major as some others) creditor therefore would need to also sign off on it??
There were lots of choices.
One day I might do something on a larger sample, just for the craic, like.
Wonder if the results would be accepted here and elsewhere unless the results tallied with the rules of the game
You thought wrong. There were 3 unsecured creditors - Higgs centre trust, the council and the revenue.
One day I might do something on a larger sample, just for the craic, like.
Wonder if the results would be accepted here and elsewhere unless the results tallied with the rules of the game
You're wrong grendal, mr know it all
Straight off the CCFC website on the day the CVA was rejected:
"At today's reconvened creditors' meeting, all parties except Arena Coventry Limited and HMRC accepted the CVA proposals.
Here's a thought, and I realise it might seem outrageous, but maybe people don't all think the same way as you do.
There is little evidence that anyone on this site (or others that I won't mention) accept anything that isn't in accordance with their own views (and yes, by implication, I do include myself).
However I think that the circa one thousand home fans attendance for the first home game of the season against attractive (by third division standards) opposition, is probably a pretty good indicator of the (general) views of the "larger sample".
It is.
Sheer numbers never reveal the nuances however. The conclusions from the numbers are usually spun in 97 different ways depending on whose agenda they need to fit.
That's the problem with where we're at, divisions and no way to move forward, as we're all trying to prove ourselves right rather than to question whether we are right.
It might be that we are right of course
A little less outrageous than your claims the other night about your racial superiority and if all people think the same way as you, we would be living in the Third Reich.
Haha, I wondered who was daft enough to report it. It was a quote from the Brass Eye 'drugs' episode.
"Luckily, the amount of heroin I use is harmless, I inject about once a month on a purely recreational basis. Fine. But what about other people less stable, less educated, less middle-class than me? Builders or blacks for example. If you're one of those, my advice is leave well alone. Good luck"
You going to flag it again?
Haha, I wondered who was daft enough to report it. It was a quote from the Brass Eye 'drugs' episode.
"Luckily, the amount of heroin I use is harmless, I inject about once a month on a purely recreational basis. Fine. But what about other people less stable, less educated, less middle-class than me? Builders or blacks for example. If you're one of those, my advice is leave well alone. Good luck"
You going to flag it again?
I didn't flag it last time and I won't flag it this time, but I am sure the moderators will soon remove it.
Your vile, racial posturing would shame this forum and all Sky Blue fans if you were a genuine member of either group. However, I suspect that you are a member of some looney right-wing group trawling for members amongst the more feeble minded members.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?