Nick
Administrator
Only if CCC are found to be in the wrong.
They've never sued Wasps. Only CCC. Wasps would have to foot the bill though.
How is it spin? It's from the EU commission website. It's a process to determine whether a law has been breached. You know, looking at the legal implications of a public body to determine if they've broken the law. Says it there in black and white. Not all legal judgements are passed in a court.
No it doesn’t. It’s the equivalent to when I was a kid and I had a mate who insisted everyone took off their shoes when they came into his house.
Another mate thought it was hilarious to refuse and when challenged say “I’m wearing trainers not shoes”. Until the first guy started saying “take off your shoes *and trainers*!”
It’s just responding to a pedantic twat in kind.
Nice deflection. So you’d be happy for us never to return to Cov as long as the people that empty the bins eventually get fucked over?
At least you’re honest about where your priorities lie.
Of course you do.
Just the same as "Chris W" does.
Up to you Nick - if you're happy being a c**t about it for just the sake of being a c**t, that's up to you. I think I joined the Warwick University CCFC Internet Mailing list in 1989 or so and several of the users of that service are still on it and are still on here. I had a good chat in that car with my son, my father and my nephew when I picked them up from the station on Tuesday night. They went, I watched on ifollow. Their opinions of the game I respect and want to discuss. I've no intention of doing that on here, frankly becuase there isn't anyone on here I want to discuss the football with.Of course you do.
Just the same as "Chris W" does.
It blows my mind that the local government had such an issue with the owners that they would see the football club slowly die to get one over on SISU.......
It blows my mind that you have such an issue with local government that you’ll see your football club slowly die to get one over on them.
....
Is a law being breached not doing something wrong now then?
This will be the same club that Joy said she liquidate if she didn't get her own way, yeah?It blows my mind that the local government had such an issue with the owners that they would see the football club slowly die to get one over on SISU.
Up to you Nick - if you're happy being a c**t about it for just the sake of being a c**t, that's up to you. I think I joined the Warwick University CCFC Internet Mailing list in 1989 or so and several of the users of that service are still on it and are still on here. I had a good chat in that car with my son, my father and my nephew when I picked them up from the station on Tuesday night. They went, I watched on ifollow. Their opinions of the game I respect and want to discuss. I've no intention of doing that on here, frankly becuase there isn't anyone on here I want to discuss the football with.
Of course it is. How have you spun my words to make them mean that?
Answer the question.
Theoretically Sisu could be using for the rest of our lifetimes in one form or another. How many years do you support CCFC playing outside of Coventry to achieve “justice”?
It blows my mind that you have such an issue with local government that you’ll see your football club slowly die to get one over on them.
There comes a time where we as fans have to say enough is enough, you’ve tried this tactic and it’s failed. Time to step up and either swallow your pride and negotiate a deal or crack on with building a ground or fuck off so someone who will can do it.
This will be the same club that Joy said she liquidate if she didn't get her own way, yeah?
PS. The council made some shit decisions, but I don't believe it was ever their intention to kill the club. We were going to get a new ground weren't we, just outside the City boundaries.
It blows my mind that a section of our fans wanted the club to go bust to get at Sisu. It blows my mind that the council bleated about moving clubs and then sold the stadium built for ccfc And propped up by ccfc to a London rugby club.
I couldn't really give a shit what mailing list you were on in 1989. I would have been 5 so don't see the relevance.
No intention or wish to talk football but you will happily interact and be beggy with social media accounts from people at the council. OK then.
You were probably getting excited when you impressed the staff fake accounts on the CET site too.
Stick around, you might make it onto a Weber Shandwick Spreadsheet like a couple of others.
Beggy? Give your head a wobble. If people choose to interact with me or ignore me, that's up to them. If you've found a single tweet where I'm 'beggy' please let me know. Tell me, which accounts are 'from the Council'? I see Fletcher pop up occasionally, but I don't follow him and he doesn't follow me. Anyone else, or are you just making up that their associated with the Council, just like you have with me?
The Weber Shandwick thing is a nice touch Nick. You're still of the impression that there are people out there being instructed by them to tweet about CCFC? That's very funny.
Wow! Some shit decisions, they completely screwed the club over, talk about missing the point.This will be the same club that Joy said she liquidate if she didn't get her own way, yeah?
PS. The council made some shit decisions, but I don't believe it was ever their intention to kill the club. We were going to get a new ground weren't we, just outside the City boundaries.
That's not what I said Nick - here's what I said.Because it was you who took issue to me saying it would only get to court if the council had done something wrong. If they have breached a law, they have done something wrong.
Nice try though.
That's not correct. It only gets to a court if the EU judgement against a breach of competition laws is appealed.
That's not what I said Nick - here's what I said.
As I've also stated, not all judgements are made in a court. If the Council have done wrong and the EU commission find against them and issue a fine, the process could end there with no appearance in court for anyone. If any judgement (for or against) is appealed, it will go before a court.
Yeah, nice try.
Which part is factually incorrect? Lets list the points individually to make it easy for you to show how it is bollocks.This argument is bollocks. You could have said the same about the JR (and probably did, many did) and we spent five years to find out there was nothing to it.
If that's what you think its your own paranoia as people aren't saying that. What they are saying is it is completely unreasonable of Wasps to demand indemnification of themselves and the council from the football club when they insist nether party has done anything wrong.Six mother fucking years I’ve been logging on to this site to see the same people insist that the council are really really evil and any minute now it’ll all be proven in court and Sisu will be shown as innocent parties justified in their actions.
Theoretically what legal action is left available to SISU if the EC decide not to proceed to investigation?Theoretically Sisu could be using for the rest of our lifetimes in one form or another.
I was on that mailing list and now I feel ancient!I couldn't really give a shit what mailing list you were on in 1989. I would have been 5 so don't see the relevance.
Is it going to go to court or any further if the EU at their first stage see nothing wrong? Yes or No.
My point is, it won't go further in this case unless the council are found to have done something wrong. Whether it's decided in a courtroom, an office or a strip club.
No matter how you try to word it.
Do we need to go over the problems with going through court even if innocent? Again?
Fair enough Dave - IIRC correctly, the (1), (2) and (3) were to denote "related parties" rather than the party being sued though.
Likewise Dave - I actually played for the Internet SBA team back in the day. Went up a few times to a tournament called Worldnet in Leeds and used to play the local side before away games. Forest, Charlton and Watford were good days out I (sort of) remember. Managed to leave my kit in a Watford pub the day Steve Walsh played for us I think we were 4-0 down at half-time. Shit game, but great day out.I was on that mailing list and now I feel ancient!
Who knows with SISU, wouldn't trust them with a penny
2) The EC is legally obliged to conduct an investigation. I have seen nothing to suggest that the EC has to proceed to investigation if they don't deem in necessary.
See what you mean. Haven't worded it very well, I'll go back and edit it. It is being claimed the EC have to proceed to investigation, I don't believe that to be the base. As far as I'm aware they only have to proceed if they find there is something to investigate.This might be your use of terminology, but that sentence seems to be completely contradictory to me. It seems to read the EC don't have to investigate, but are legally obliged to.
Did you mean the EC don't have to proceed to court/legal proceedings?
Does that mean they are carrying out an investigation to determine if an investigation is required??????????????See what you mean. Haven't worded it very well, I'll go back and edit it. It is being claimed the EC have to proceed to investigation, I don't believe that to be the base. As far as I'm aware they only have to proceed if they find there is something to investigate.
Up to you Nick - if you're happy being a c**t about it for just the sake of being a c**t, that's up to you. I think I joined the Warwick University CCFC Internet Mailing list in 1989 or so and several of the users of that service are still on it and are still on here. I had a good chat in that car with my son, my father and my nephew when I picked them up from the station on Tuesday night. They went, I watched on ifollow. Their opinions of the game I respect and want to discuss. I've no intention of doing that on here, frankly becuase there isn't anyone on here I want to discuss the football with.
I've had many an abusive comment thrown at me on here (including the C word). I've reported them, but nothing gets done.You don't want to chat about football, but come on here and are happy to drop the 'c' word on people. Not really sure why you'd bother.- and whilst I respect people's right to an opinion, you tend to lose the moral high ground when you join in throwing abuse about. Not just you by the way, that includes Nick and me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?