Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Bin Strikes (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Dec 15, 2021
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 24
Next
First Prev 6 of 24 Next Last

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 18, 2021
  • #176
David O'Day said:
Any shocked the braying c**t who lorded it over people because they had Bournemouth tickets thinks the plebs should know their role
Click to expand...
Lorded it over nobody. I only stepped in to defend a mate you have no idea about and usual were chatting shit. Gerry Adams fanboy you really are a vile specimen and I'm disappointed we even support the same team.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2021
  • #177
clint van damme said:
Well we increase wages and only apply it to certain sections of society.
Click to expand...

We do that already, only the wrong way round.
 

JAM See

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 23, 2021
  • #178

No Cov bin collections over Christmas period as strike to go ahead

Coventry residents will have to drop their rubbish off themselves at points across the city
www.coventrytelegraph.net

As an aside, I applied to be a binman a few years ago.

Asked the interviewer what training I would get.

"No training required mate" he said

"You'll pick it up as you go along"
 
Reactions: duffer

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #179
Council response to Unite claims

Published Wednesday, 05 January 2022

The Council has issued a statement in response to claims made by the Unite union regarding the ongoing strike action.

The statement reads:

Once again, we are forced to correct blatant inaccuracies published by the union Unite regarding the ongoing talks to try and stop the strike action they have organised.

While we do not want to get into a public war of words, failing to challenge the falsehoods they are continuing to present runs the risk of people believing them.

The residents of Coventry that we serve deserve better.

In the union’s latest release from its national headquarters, there are several pieces of information presented as ‘facts’ that are simply not true.

Not one of the bin lorry drivers earn “as little as £22,183 a year.” We pay them. We know.
Over the last the 12 months the lowest paid driver took home £28,148, with the highest earner receiving £52,163.
As a responsible employer we take exception to Unite’s claim that we pay our drivers “poverty pay rates”. The facts are that the average pay a bin lorry driver received over the last 12 months was £34,143. You decide if that’s poverty pay.Unite claim “Our Coventry members agreed to postpone strike action over Christmas in good faith to allow further talks with the city council.”
The truth is we were informed by Unite’s Regional Officer they had failed to follow due process meaning the strike before Christmas was to be called off, but the January strikes remained.
We stayed silent on the reason as we were more focused on the talks but when an attempt is made to rewrite history to win public favour, we are compelled to put the record straight.Unite seem justifiably proud of the “12.5 per cent pay uplift, worth about £3,000 a year” deal they have negotiated for bin lorry drivers in Plymouth and encourage Coventry to do the same.
But the deal they have achieved means Plymouth drivers now have the potential to earn at the top of the grade about £29,500 a year. As already stated, the average earnings of a bin lorry driver in Coventry in the last 12 months was £34,143.Unite claim the reason talks planned for 4 Jan were halted was because “the only offer tabled was one our membership had previously rejected.”
The facts are we did not table any offer on the 4th as they did not happen. We wanted independent mediators ACAS to be part of the conversation and Unite wanted to speak to their members before taking part. There is no mention of ACAS in their official statement.Unite claim there is an HGV driver retention problem. For Class I HGV drivers that is true and has been well-publicised nationally. Class I drivers drive the articulated lorries that are so essential to guaranteeing supplies across the country from food to petrol. But Coventry City Council does not employ any Class I drivers. Our bin lorry drivers are Class II HGV drivers. Nationally, Class II drivers earn less than Class I.
Recruitment and retention are thankfully issues we do not face. We have lost 14 Class II HGV drivers in the last three years but only three because of pay or conditions. We have also added an additional four crews into our service in the last six months meaning we have successfully recruited an additional 20 employees without any problem.

Coventry City Council remains committed to resolving the ongoing issues Unite have raised with us. That has not, and will not, change.

Although we remain committed, we have limits to what we can offer as we know we already are one of the highest paying local authorities in the West Midlands for Class II HGV drivers. We are also mindful of the duty we have to all of our 4,500-strong workforce and the possibility of future equal pay claims.

But above all, we are mindful of the inevitable impact this strike action is having on our residents. We are really sorry about this and we want to be clear that we remain open and willing to do all we can resolve things
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #180
rob9872 said:
Council response to Unite claims

Published Wednesday, 05 January 2022

The Council has issued a statement in response to claims made by the Unite union regarding the ongoing strike action.

The statement reads:

Once again, we are forced to correct blatant inaccuracies published by the union Unite regarding the ongoing talks to try and stop the strike action they have organised.

While we do not want to get into a public war of words, failing to challenge the falsehoods they are continuing to present runs the risk of people believing them.

The residents of Coventry that we serve deserve better.

In the union’s latest release from its national headquarters, there are several pieces of information presented as ‘facts’ that are simply not true.

Not one of the bin lorry drivers earn “as little as £22,183 a year.” We pay them. We know.
Over the last the 12 months the lowest paid driver took home £28,148, with the highest earner receiving £52,163.
As a responsible employer we take exception to Unite’s claim that we pay our drivers “poverty pay rates”. The facts are that the average pay a bin lorry driver received over the last 12 months was £34,143. You decide if that’s poverty pay.Unite claim “Our Coventry members agreed to postpone strike action over Christmas in good faith to allow further talks with the city council.”
The truth is we were informed by Unite’s Regional Officer they had failed to follow due process meaning the strike before Christmas was to be called off, but the January strikes remained.
We stayed silent on the reason as we were more focused on the talks but when an attempt is made to rewrite history to win public favour, we are compelled to put the record straight.Unite seem justifiably proud of the “12.5 per cent pay uplift, worth about £3,000 a year” deal they have negotiated for bin lorry drivers in Plymouth and encourage Coventry to do the same.
But the deal they have achieved means Plymouth drivers now have the potential to earn at the top of the grade about £29,500 a year. As already stated, the average earnings of a bin lorry driver in Coventry in the last 12 months was £34,143.Unite claim the reason talks planned for 4 Jan were halted was because “the only offer tabled was one our membership had previously rejected.”
The facts are we did not table any offer on the 4th as they did not happen. We wanted independent mediators ACAS to be part of the conversation and Unite wanted to speak to their members before taking part. There is no mention of ACAS in their official statement.Unite claim there is an HGV driver retention problem. For Class I HGV drivers that is true and has been well-publicised nationally. Class I drivers drive the articulated lorries that are so essential to guaranteeing supplies across the country from food to petrol. But Coventry City Council does not employ any Class I drivers. Our bin lorry drivers are Class II HGV drivers. Nationally, Class II drivers earn less than Class I.
Recruitment and retention are thankfully issues we do not face. We have lost 14 Class II HGV drivers in the last three years but only three because of pay or conditions. We have also added an additional four crews into our service in the last six months meaning we have successfully recruited an additional 20 employees without any problem.

Coventry City Council remains committed to resolving the ongoing issues Unite have raised with us. That has not, and will not, change.

Although we remain committed, we have limits to what we can offer as we know we already are one of the highest paying local authorities in the West Midlands for Class II HGV drivers. We are also mindful of the duty we have to all of our 4,500-strong workforce and the possibility of future equal pay claims.

But above all, we are mindful of the inevitable impact this strike action is having on our residents. We are really sorry about this and we want to be clear that we remain open and willing to do all we can resolve things
Click to expand...

Why don't they see if they can parachute in some nomadic lorry drivers currently based in Wycombe?
 
Reactions: vow, stay_up_skyblues, Sick Boy and 4 others

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #181
Why is our council so unprofessional? That statement reads like it was written by an upset kid after a playground argument.

Interestingly they state the highest paid driver earns £52,163, you can go on any job website and find shedloads of class 1 HGV vacancies for £50K upwards so that doesn't look great. They're playing the 'race to the bottom' card hoping people will be against the drivers due to the the thought of binmen earning more than they do when in reality we should be pushing for better pay and conditions across the board.
 
Reactions: LastGarrison, Sky_Blue_Dreamer and duffer

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #182
It is properly ranty, it's like they let Duggins have the keyboard for a day while he ranted while typing with 1 finger. Muttering "I will show them" under his breath.

£52K a year for driving a bin lorry though. Whoever that is is living the dream.
 
Reactions: no_loyalty

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #183
Nick said:
£52K a year for driving a bin lorry though. Whoever that is is living the dream.
Click to expand...
Odds on that being one person who is on way more than anyone else and only gets paid that much because they work a load of overtime? Otherwise you would have to question how there can be over £24K difference in the pay of two people doing exactly the same job.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #184
chiefdave said:
Odds on that being one person who is on way more than anyone else and only gets paid that much because they work a load of overtime? Otherwise you would have to question how there can be over £24K difference in the pay of two people doing exactly the same job.
Click to expand...

Yeah or somebody who has been there about 50 years and on some agreement that they can't get rid of.
 

JAM See

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #185
Interesting that they've quoted upper, lower and average (I presume they mean 'mean').

They should also quote the median.

The average may well be skewed by a small number of very high earners (due to service or overtime).
 
Reactions: fernandopartridge, Sky_Blue_Dreamer and chiefdave

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #186
Somebody very close to me who is arguing against the strike (I’m for), showed me that statement as if it blew any pro argument out of the water, it was brilliant. Horrifically written and as said, sounds really petulant.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #187
rob9872 said:
Council response to Unite claims

Published Wednesday, 05 January 2022

The Council has issued a statement in response to claims made by the Unite union regarding the ongoing strike action.

The statement reads:

Once again, we are forced to correct blatant inaccuracies published by the union Unite regarding the ongoing talks to try and stop the strike action they have organised.

While we do not want to get into a public war of words, failing to challenge the falsehoods they are continuing to present runs the risk of people believing them.

The residents of Coventry that we serve deserve better.

In the union’s latest release from its national headquarters, there are several pieces of information presented as ‘facts’ that are simply not true.

Not one of the bin lorry drivers earn “as little as £22,183 a year.” We pay them. We know.
Over the last the 12 months the lowest paid driver took home £28,148, with the highest earner receiving £52,163.
As a responsible employer we take exception to Unite’s claim that we pay our drivers “poverty pay rates”. The facts are that the average pay a bin lorry driver received over the last 12 months was £34,143. You decide if that’s poverty pay.Unite claim “Our Coventry members agreed to postpone strike action over Christmas in good faith to allow further talks with the city council.”
The truth is we were informed by Unite’s Regional Officer they had failed to follow due process meaning the strike before Christmas was to be called off, but the January strikes remained.
We stayed silent on the reason as we were more focused on the talks but when an attempt is made to rewrite history to win public favour, we are compelled to put the record straight.Unite seem justifiably proud of the “12.5 per cent pay uplift, worth about £3,000 a year” deal they have negotiated for bin lorry drivers in Plymouth and encourage Coventry to do the same.
But the deal they have achieved means Plymouth drivers now have the potential to earn at the top of the grade about £29,500 a year. As already stated, the average earnings of a bin lorry driver in Coventry in the last 12 months was £34,143.Unite claim the reason talks planned for 4 Jan were halted was because “the only offer tabled was one our membership had previously rejected.”
The facts are we did not table any offer on the 4th as they did not happen. We wanted independent mediators ACAS to be part of the conversation and Unite wanted to speak to their members before taking part. There is no mention of ACAS in their official statement.Unite claim there is an HGV driver retention problem. For Class I HGV drivers that is true and has been well-publicised nationally. Class I drivers drive the articulated lorries that are so essential to guaranteeing supplies across the country from food to petrol. But Coventry City Council does not employ any Class I drivers. Our bin lorry drivers are Class II HGV drivers. Nationally, Class II drivers earn less than Class I.
Recruitment and retention are thankfully issues we do not face. We have lost 14 Class II HGV drivers in the last three years but only three because of pay or conditions. We have also added an additional four crews into our service in the last six months meaning we have successfully recruited an additional 20 employees without any problem.

Coventry City Council remains committed to resolving the ongoing issues Unite have raised with us. That has not, and will not, change.

Although we remain committed, we have limits to what we can offer as we know we already are one of the highest paying local authorities in the West Midlands for Class II HGV drivers. We are also mindful of the duty we have to all of our 4,500-strong workforce and the possibility of future equal pay claims.

But above all, we are mindful of the inevitable impact this strike action is having on our residents. We are really sorry about this and we want to be clear that we remain open and willing to do all we can resolve things
Click to expand...
Direct from my contract
 
Reactions: Sick Boy, chiefdave and Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #188
Moronic statement from the council
 
Reactions: chiefdave and Evo1883

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #189
Sky Blue Pete said:
Moronic statement from the council
Click to expand...
Drove past this morning. hooted my support
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #190
The council recently started several drivers on 27000 , which means they've skipped above people who have been there for several years , who have to work for 11 years to make the top of the grade ... the only way they could get these drivers to start , was by paying them more .. so I'm on 4.4k less than somebody who started just after me doing the same job
 
Reactions: duffer and chiefdave

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #191
Evo1883 said:
The council recently started several drivers on 27000 , which means they've skipped above people who have been there for several years , who have to work for 11 years to make the top of the grade ... the only way they could get these drivers to start , was by paying them more .. so I'm on 4.4k less than somebody who started just after me doing the same job
Click to expand...
Knew it would be something like this. Which of course means if we listen to 'just let them leave' the replacements will be on more so they will have in effect given the pay rise anyway but spent months without drivers while they recruit.
 
Reactions: duffer

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #192
Such disingenuous farts
 
Reactions: Evo1883

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #193
Evo1883 said:
Direct from my contract View attachment 23423
Click to expand...

You must be mistaken, our council would never mislead the public
 
Reactions: Sick Boy, chiefdave and Evo1883

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #194
clint van damme said:
You must be mistaken, our council would never mislead the public
Click to expand...

Never mate
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #195
Evo1883 said:
Direct from my contract View attachment 23423
Click to expand...

In fairness mate, if they're going to pay the people at the top well over 100k (and sometimes much, much more), then there isn't going to be much left for guys like you doing actual, meaningful work...

Top Coventry council bosses paid £2.9m

A new 'Rich List' has been published
www.coventrytelegraph.net
 
Reactions: Ccfcsj, no_loyalty and Sky Blue Pete

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #196
chiefdave said:
Why is our council so unprofessional? That statement reads like it was written by an upset kid after a playground argument.

Interestingly they state the highest paid driver earns £52,163, you can go on any job website and find shedloads of class 1 HGV vacancies for £50K upwards so that doesn't look great. They're playing the 'race to the bottom' card hoping people will be against the drivers due to the the thought of binmen earning more than they do when in reality we should be pushing for better pay and conditions across the board.
Click to expand...

Looks like a highly misleading press release from the council to me, they state an average of 34k but that will be skewed by somebody on 52k. Just looks very selective.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #197
fernandopartridge said:
Looks like a highly misleading press release from the council to me, they state an average of 34k but that will be skewed by somebody on 52k. Just looks very selective.
Click to expand...
No idea of the numbers, but they've recruited 20 it says in recent months. Even if they were the only 20 drivers the 52k driver woukd make less than 1k diff per driver and I assume significantly less difference. I'd assume its someone doing lots of hours though, but I guess H&S limits prevent too many hours for a driver.
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #198
rob9872 said:
No idea of the numbers, but they've recruited 20 it says in recent months. Even if they were the only 20 drivers the 52k driver woukd make less than 1k diff per driver and I assume significantly less difference. I'd assume its someone doing lots of hours though, but I guess H&S limits prevent too many hours for a driver.
Click to expand...

With it being driving, it seems unlikely for a driver to manage to rack up that amount of £ difference where rules are concerned.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #199
Might go onto march??
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #200
Nick said:
Might go onto march??
Click to expand...
Councils statement worked then
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #201
chiefdave said:
Councils statement worked then
Click to expand...

well it saves money as they I assume get zero pay and I’ll just take my refuge to one of these designated sites
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #202
Grendel said:
well it saves money as they I assume get zero pay and I’ll just take my refuge to one of these designated sites
Click to expand...
Exactly. Doing the work for them, for free and paying them for the privelage.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #203
Evo1883 said:
Direct from my contract View attachment 23423
Click to expand...
I'd also like to add the part that states they've employed 20 people is also misleading , as 95% of those people were already working there as agency , some for well over a year

There has been no "EXTRA " crews per se recruited at all
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #204
Evo1883 said:
I'd also like to add the part that states they've employed 20 people is also misleading , as 95% of those people were already working there as agency , some for well over a year

There has been no "EXTRA " crews per se recruited at all
Click to expand...

I'd like to know why they think balloting rules for a strike weren't followed. If you get over 50% of all members then it's perfectly legal.
 
Reactions: Evo1883

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #205
Brighton Sky Blue said:
I'd like to know why they think balloting rules for a strike weren't followed. If you get over 50% of all members then it's perfectly legal.
Click to expand...
I'd like to know why a Labour Council is fighting against its main union , buy hey ho
 
Reactions: duffer
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #206
Evo1883 said:
I'd like to know why a Labour Council is fighting against its main union , buy hey ho
Click to expand...

I find it very hard to believe union bosses wouldn’t know correct strike ballot procedures. Keep it going I say
 
Reactions: Evo1883

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 6, 2022
  • #207
Evo1883 said:
I'd like to know why a Labour Council is fighting against its main union , buy hey ho
Click to expand...

 

Mild-Mannered Janitor

Kindest Bloke on CCFC / Maker of CCFC Dreams
  • Jan 7, 2022
  • #208
Interest rates don’t have to rise with growing inflation, too many times this has been used to try and curb it but actually inflates it and is a proven poor tactic to address the fundamental problems driving the Inflation.
the impact of such a move now would be be very different to when used in the 80’s/90’s as there were very few fixed rate mortgages available or taken up, the impact on individuals now is less so.
As to a reason for wage rises, necessary to cover elements around the cost to live, not all industry related prices are caused by salaries, shortage of supply, governmental taxes, profiteering, oil is cheap now but the highest a consumer has faced for a long time And therefore rises are needed to assist people in that living.
Wage increases, whilst do have the ability to cause a level of inflation, is needed at levels for people to be able to survive, I don’t believe in the all index as not everyone spends at those index levels on TV’s etc, but there is no denying that inflation on foodstuff/energy is increasing and that does impact peoples lives and ability to live.
that’s why I believe wages should increase, not uniformally or at the inflation rate but would be interested as to why they shouldn’t Grendel and the ramifications/impact if no one in the UK ever had a pay increase again
 
Reactions: fernandopartridge and Brighton Sky Blue

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2022
  • #209
Mild-Mannered Janitor said:
Interest rates don’t have to rise with growing inflation, too many times this has been used to try and curb it but actually inflates it and is a proven poor tactic to address the fundamental problems driving the Inflation.
the impact of such a move now would be be very different to when used in the 80’s/90’s as there were very few fixed rate mortgages available or taken up, the impact on individuals now is less so.
As to a reason for wage rises, necessary to cover elements around the cost to live, not all industry related prices are caused by salaries, shortage of supply, governmental taxes, profiteering, oil is cheap now but the highest a consumer has faced for a long time And therefore rises are needed to assist people in that living.
Wage increases, whilst do have the ability to cause a level of inflation, is needed at levels for people to be able to survive, I don’t believe in the all index as not everyone spends at those index levels on TV’s etc, but there is no denying that inflation on foodstuff/energy is increasing and that does impact peoples lives and ability to live.
that’s why I believe wages should increase, not uniformally or at the inflation rate but would be interested as to why they shouldn’t Grendel and the ramifications/impact if no one in the UK ever had a pay increase again
Click to expand...

Where on earth haven’t I said people shouldn’t have a pay rise at all
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 7, 2022
  • #210
Grendel said:
Where on earth haven’t I said people shouldn’t have a pay rise at all
Click to expand...

Wasn’t your whole argument that wage rises drive inflation?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 24
Next
First Prev 6 of 24 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?