Asante 3 match ban incoming (9 Viewers)

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Just been reading something on Facebook and you would think that there was a murder there last night those Norwich twats are going crazy about it.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I am glad the ref didn't spot it, because if he had, BTA would have been sent off and we would have gone on to lose the match.
Dave Chapelle GIF by MOODMAN
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
He's not even looking at him, expected it to be must worse way everyone was going on about it. He's trying to hand him off, keep him at arms length and was just unfortunate with the contact.
But under the rules that is where reckless comes in …..
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Recklessness leads to a booking, not a red.

Red card can be given Serious Foul Play a tackle or challenge that endangers a players safety or uses excessive force.

Violent Conduct any action involving physical force that is not a challenge for the ball.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Red card can be given Serious Foul Play a tackle or challenge that endangers a players safety or uses excessive force.

Violent Conduct any action involving physical force that is not a challenge for the ball.
That is all correct, but challenges deemed ‘reckless’ go for a caution.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Red card can be given Serious Foul Play a tackle or challenge that endangers a players safety or uses excessive force.

Violent Conduct any action involving physical force that is not a challenge for the ball.
That is all correct, but challenges deemed ‘reckless’ go for a caution.
So he is in danger of getting a retrospective red, “challenge that endangers a players safety” and “any action involving physical force that is not a challenge for the ball.”
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
Suggested before, there should be a time limit on VAR decisions. 30 seconds and if you still can't decide, on field decision stands.
said this all along...look at our perfectly good goal against manure, was it 4 or 5 minutes of desperation just to find a reason to let the 'big boys' through because Haji hadn't cut his toe nails that day!
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Agree about a time limit for VAR. In one game recently it took 8 minutes which makes a mockery of clear and obvious.

To be honest I’m in favour of putting it in the bin and just living with referees making mistakes.
 

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
Agree about a time limit for VAR. In one game recently it took 8 minutes which makes a mockery of clear and obvious.

To be honest I’m in favour of putting it in the bin and just living with referees making mistakes.
Clear and obvious yes, no slow motion replays, no lines drawn across the pitch and a 1 minute time limit on the decision. That seems to easy though.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Clear and obvious yes, no slow motion replays, no lines drawn across the pitch and a 1 minute time limit on the decision. That seems to easy though.

I like the proposal around off side - if any part of the attackers body is level with the defender they are onside. Get back to scoring goals, none of this his toe was offside.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
I can't remember now if the BTA incident was before or after we took the lead, but I think there's every chance that if he had been sent off we would not actually have lost the game, as we would have then set ourselves up more defensively and wouldn't have made ourselves so susceptible to Norwich's counter attacks.
We hadn’t scored by that point?
 

Potbellypig

Well-Known Member
Little old Stoke having a melt down over Asanti. They really dont like us do they since we beat them in the league and they acted like theyde won the cup final beating our resrve team in the third round. Think they are all getting a bit protective over Robins thinking we treated him harshly

Just read that link. Someone said when was the last time someone was given a retrospective ban and all I could think of was Matty Godden for his penalty dive against Fulham. Can't have been many since then.
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
Just read that link. Someone said when was the last time someone was given a retrospective ban and all I could think of was Matty Godden for his penalty dive against Fulham. Can't have been many since then.

I'd be surprised if Norwich didn't put a complaint in. 😡
 

SeaSeeEffCee

Well-Known Member
If we get away with this there can’t be any more complaints of a refereeing conspiracy against us this season. Clear as day red and retrospective ban.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KAB

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
If we get away with this there can’t be any more complaints of a refereeing conspiracy against us this season. Clear as day red and retrospective ban.
Surely that only applies if the officials saw it. Not matter how incompetent / corrupt (delete according to your preference) they are not doing something about an incident they didn't see doesn't really absolve them of blame for every other incident this season.

If Norwich have to lodge a complaint, I've no idea if they do or its a forum 'fact', for there to be consideration of a retrospective ban then its out of the officials hands.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Surely that only applies if the officials saw it. Not matter how incompetent / corrupt (delete according to your preference) they are not doing something about an incident they didn't see doesn't really absolve them of blame for every other incident this season.

If Norwich have to lodge a complaint, I've no idea if they do or its a forum 'fact', for there to be consideration of a retrospective ban then its out of the officials hands.

No don’t think that’s true.

IMG_5922.jpeg
 

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
Is there any time limit on when a complaint has to be lodged?

Will they bother seeing as they won?

Me just going off the fact Brandon seems a sound bloke in all the unseen vids it felt a bit out of character
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Has he been charged? Presumably if he’s not charged in the next 45 mins he won’t be?

Sounds a lot like that but the club is so closed with info these days I wouldn’t be surprised if we don’t hear until it’s announced which I’d guess must be by Friday?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top