Armstrong's Goal Today (1 Viewer)

Nick · Mar 5, 2016

It looked on side, one of their defenders (may have been right back as it was over that way) looked to be playing him on.

I think the ref and lino had a bit of a stinker, they got their pen but how their Lino didn't see their defender have Lamieries by the throat I don't know.

Johnnythespider · Mar 5, 2016

I thought the one in the first half was close as well

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

Nick · Mar 5, 2016

Johnnythespider said:
I thought the one in the first half was close as well

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

Was that when he hammered it over?

Silence_Is_The_Enemy · Mar 5, 2016

anything that was 50/50 the flag went up thought they called them off a few times they were not to ¬_¬ one of them days amazed maddison didnt get at least 1 yellow for continued diving bloody ridiculous

stupot07 · Mar 5, 2016

I thought both decisions were right.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

Nick · Mar 5, 2016

There was one where Stokes knew he was offside so he put his hands up and stood still. Before the ball went anywhere near him he was flagging.

The Great Eastern · Mar 5, 2016

2nd half 'goal' was offside for sure. Not by much but they got that one right.

However, would you have faith in an officials team who couldn't even work out that their 1st half shirts of green were
actually a colour clash with Rochdale's shirts ?

Nick · Mar 5, 2016

stupot07 said:
I thought both decisions were right.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

I'll watch it again, could be wrong as I only saw it at the time but it did look onside. Couldn't really see the penalty.

Deleted member 4439 · Mar 5, 2016

All the key decisions looked correct today, though I thought the ref seemed to slow down the play quite a bit.

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · Mar 5, 2016

The 1st offside goal I thought looked on.

lifeskyblue · Mar 5, 2016

I thought arma was onside...and the Lino was not up with play.
We should have had two penalties second half. One hands on players throat the other a blatant two handed shove in the back.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Johnnythespider · Mar 5, 2016

Nick said:
Was that when he hammered it over?

No, ball in from the left and side-footed into bottom corner, unless I dreamed it !!

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · Mar 5, 2016

Johnnythespider said:
No, ball in from the left and side-footed into bottom corner, unless I dreamed it !!

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

That's the one Lino was well out of position.

Nick · Mar 5, 2016

Johnnythespider said:
No, ball in from the left and side-footed into bottom corner, unless I dreamed it !!

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

I completely forgot about that, hadn't the whistle already gone when he scored?

Deleted member 4439 · Mar 5, 2016

Highlights confirm that the first was offside, even though Armstrong tied to do a little jink to get himself onside. Second also looks offside but would need to freeze frame.

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · Mar 5, 2016

dubed said:
Highlights confirm that the first was offside, even though Armstrong tied to do a little jink to get himself onside. Second also looks offside but would need to freeze frame.

Fair enough

Nick · Mar 5, 2016

Just watched, first was offside, second wasnt I dont think. The player by Fortune was playing him on

If you freeze frame it shows ads

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · Mar 5, 2016

Nick said:
Just watched, first was offside, second wasnt I dont think. The player by Fortune was playing him on

If you freeze frame it shows ads

Ads Armstrong?

Deleted member 4439 · Mar 5, 2016

Nick said:
Just watched, first was offside, second wasnt I dont think. The player by Fortune was playing him on

If you freeze frame it shows ads

exactly....hence can't freeze frame? will look at the extended highlights tomorrow.

skybluepm2 · Mar 5, 2016

Having watched the highlights again, I'd say the second was definitely onside. All 3 officials were inconsistent bellends today although that's hardly new in this pathetic excuse of a league.

eastwoodsdustman · Mar 5, 2016

I was sat in line with the second one and I was sure at the time that he was onside, as were people around me.

Deleted member 4439 · Mar 6, 2016

Mowbray's analyst saying the second goal was onside, and the extended highlights appear to support this.

CJ_covblaze · Mar 6, 2016

First decision - Offside. Relects poorly on Armstrong. Especially as he can use the 22 as a guide.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444729941172224

Second decision - Offside. At first glance I thought he was at least level but after seeing it a couple of times his knee and head are ahead of the last man. The lines from the mower make it a bit clearer.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444832277979137

chiefdave · Mar 6, 2016

dubed said:
not sure how you can call it from simply looking at the provided photos, making allowances for angles.

If you use the lines on the pitch as a guide it certainly looks onside.

Nick · Mar 6, 2016

CJ_covblaze said:
First decision - Offside. Relects poorly on Armstrong. Especially as he can use the 22 as a guide.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444729941172224

Second decision - Offside. At first glance I thought he was at least level but after seeing it a couple of times his knee and head are ahead of the last man. The lines from the mower make it a bit clearer.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444832277979137

On there though, there is a split second where the ball has moved away from Murphy's foot

Deleted member 4439 · Mar 6, 2016

It was onside. The twitter photo is taken after ball contact. If you magnify the second of the photos I uploaded you'll see the white trail of the ball, confirming that the photo is taken after ball contact, at which time Armstrong is onside. Difficult decision for the RA, but there you go.

stupot07 · Mar 6, 2016

To be honest, if we can't make our minds up and have to freeze frame and 1 frame/0.1 second is the difference between looking offside or looking onside, then it really isn't that bad a decision by the linesman by the naked eye.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

Deleted member 4439 · Mar 6, 2016

stupot07 said:
To be honest, if we can't make our minds up and have to freeze frame and 1 frame/0.1 second is the difference between looking offside or looking onside, then it really isn't that bad a decision by the linesman by the naked eye.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

In as much that is was a difficult decision, then it certainty wasn't an outrageous decision. In that the lino got it wrong, and therefore changed the game, it was a bad decision!

Armstrong's Goal Today (1 Viewer)

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Deleted member 4439

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Deleted member 4439

Guest

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 4439

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 4439

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Deleted member 4439

Guest

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 4439

Guest

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency