Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
Or by the looks of it, not included in the graph. According to line 4 and 5, this was data up until 2014.
I'd presume it is part of the 10 year average on the 3rd line.
2996 killed, including many British citizens, on Sept 11, 2001.
Why isn't Saudi Arabia on the list?2996 killed, including many British citizens, on Sept 11, 2001.
Several similar attacks have been planned since and been foiled by good intelligence work.
It's not just what happens you have to worry about but also the many planned attacks that are successfully thwarted.
Makes perfect sense that he should score lower with females, as he has been rather derogatory to women in general.More Britons are in favour of a Donald Trump state visit to the UK than are against it, poll shows
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/01/britons-favour-donald-trump-state-visit-uk-against-poll-shows
A greater number of Britons are in favour of Donald Trump’s state visit than oppose it, according to new polling data from YouGov.
When asked whether they thought the visit should go ahead or be cancelled, 49 per cent of British adults were in favour of the visit, compared to just 36 per cent who were against it.
Within the headline figure of 49 per cent there were some key splits among the population.
Men were more in favour of Donald Trump coming to the UK than women were, with three in five men saying they thought the state visit should proceed - among women the figure was two in five.
Age was also a defining factor in how many people supported Trump's proposed visit, with more support for it the older the respondents were.
Another obvious split concerned how respondents had voted in the EU referendum last June. As many as 68 per cent of Leave voters thought Trump's state visit should go ahead, while there was half as much support among those on the Remain side.
Makes perfect sense that he should score lower with females, as he has been rather derogatory to women in general.
Unfortunately, however you look at it and whatever you think of him, we have to work with the bloke.
We have to work and negotiate with all kinds of unsavoury leaders.
Shown his true colours again today.
Obama signed an agreement with Australia to take 1,200 refugees currently held in detention camps by the Australian government into the US.
Australia had refused to take them in there. Refugees are from Afghanistan, Iraq, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh etc.
It is thought that 80% of them are genuine refugees.
Trump has come out and said taking them in would be like 'accepting the next Boston Bombers into this country.'
Lovely racial stereotyping right there.
He's a clown.
No, I don't think it reads quite like that. They know 80% are genuine, they don't know about the other 20%.Two polite points if I may Otis.
1) Australia had refused to take them in. Why? Also, why no outcry there?
2) What about the other 20%, who are not genuine refugees?
Would like to see how he would get on doing that to the Chinese leader or Putin.Plus he apparently started yelling at the Australian PM on the phone and then hung up on him!
No, I don't think it reads quite like that. They know 80% are genuine, they don't know about the other 20%.
Any anyway, even if they are not genuine refugees that doesn't make them terrorists does it?
As for Australia, it's not these particular refugees, they have just refused to take any. It's not because of these refugees in particular.
I am picking up more on the point that he is saying that accepting the refugees is like accepting the next Boston Bombers.No it doesn't, but is there any point in taking a risk?
My point still stands. Trump is an arse, but here he has just followed Australia, and actually Obama before. There was no outcry there.
I am picking up more on the point that he is saying that accepting the refugees is like accepting the next Boston Bombers.
That's an outrageous thing to say.
Haven't you noticed. Outright racism is ok now and if you don't accept it you're either a liberal snowflake or not living in the real worldI am picking up more on the point that he is saying that accepting the refugees is like accepting the next Boston Bombers.
That's an outrageous thing to say.
He's already pissed China off by speaking to the Taiwanese leader before them. Not the done thing.Would like to see how he would get on doing that to the Chinese leader or Putin.
Yay!! I can't wait.He's already pissed China off by speaking to the Taiwanese leader before them. Not the done thing.
Steve Bannon, the white supremacist Trump has appointed as chief strategist at the White House has said recently "We’re going to war in the South China Sea in five to 10 years, there’s no doubt about that. They’re taking their sandbars and making basically stationary aircraft carriers and putting missiles on those. They come here to the United States in front of our face – and you understand how important face is – and say it’s an ancient territorial sea.”.
China has also warned that war between the two countries is possible. “A ‘war within the president’s term’ or ‘war breaking out tonight’ are not just slogans, they are becoming a practical reality” was the statement made by the Chinese military on the day of Trumps inauguration.
Bannon has also said the US will be going back in to the Middle East “Some of these situations may get a little unpleasant, but you know what, we’re in a war. We’re clearly going into, I think, a major shooting war in the Middle East again.”
Yay!! I can't wait.
Hillary was planning to go to war with Russia if elected. The Pentagon still is, regardless of what President Trump wants.
I don't need a 'source' since they've hardly made any secret of it. You only have to look at all the actions they've taken since the supposed end of the Cold War.Really. Thanks for the info.. Who is your source at the Pentagon? Better let Steve Bannon know about that.
Haven't you noticed. Outright racism is ok now and if you don't accept it you're either a liberal snowflake or not living in the real world
I don't need a 'source' since they've hardly made any secret of it. You only have to look at all the actions they've taken since the supposed end of the Cold War.
I spent a bit of time talking with my girlfriend's 96 year old great aunt in Italy this week about the current state of the western world....it's a shame that the lessons learnt from fascism have been forgotten.
The cold war ended in the 90s. Hilary cannot be blamed for everything since then. I think you need a source if you want to claim they are planning for war with Russia. Steve Bannon on the other hand has made it quite clear that China and the ME are on his list.
It makes perfect sense to me not to allow people into your country who have no intent to integrate and could well pose a danger to society.
I have no problem letting in a reasonable number of genuine refugees once you have in place a reliable vetting procedure to ensure they really are genuine refugees.
And that is exactly what Trump is doing.
We already know for a fact that ISIS have used the refugee crisis to smuggle operatives into Europe.
Not for some.The cold war ended in the 90s.
I never suggested she was. Her husband however was entirely responsible for the bombing of non-aligned Yugoslavia and the ceding of Kosovo to Islamic extremists.Hilary cannot be blamed for everything since then.
I don't need anything of the sort, it's plain to see for any observer of military planning. The US and its allies have already occupied most of the former eastern-bloc countries which border Russia and but for a rebellion by British MP's in 2013 would have bombed Assad's forces in Syria which would have brought them into direct military conflict with Russia.I think you need a source if you want to claim they are planning for war with Russia.
He may have his agenda but the Pentagon also have theirs which has not changed since the supposed ending of the Cold War.Steve Bannon on the other hand has made it quite clear that China and the ME are on his list.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?