Yes. And in a football coaching role, just so I can't side-step paying up if he's appointed as a traffic warden. Or pie critic for The Telegraph's 'Eating Out' section
Robins was working for the FA for most of that year, leading their elite coaching programme. Not exactly out of work. Maybe he wasn't interested in going back to management for that year? Had that occurred?
Consider it a deal-I'll throw in a pocket dictionary for goodwill.
And by means of reciprocating goodwill, I'll try and brainwash myself into forgetting your claims with regards McGoldrick being a useless waste of a loan move.
Maybe...
I didn't use those words and in the same post wished to be proven wrong. Funny how the details are often overlooked in pursuit of oneupmanship old chap.
The stats you elude to are from different divisions. It's like comparing sherry trifles with monkey wrenches.
My figures were tongue-in-cheek. However; it's undeniable. Thorn and Saunders were identical in performance last year. In the same division this year, Saunders was superior to Robins.
Which is why Saunders got the Wolves job; and Robins the Huddesfield role.
You're not taking on board the obvious. You can't judge Thorn on three games this season. It's frankly silly.
Still, you should be happy. Allowing for another caretaker and a permanent appointment, we'll only have had five managers this season. The farce you often crave is there for your entertainment
Why are we still discussing the fat, unintelligent and talentless prick? He is history.
You can judge him on the whole of last season, when he didn't even manage to average 1 point a game.
Talking of mathematical gymnastics, Saunders and Thorn had a identical record in The Championship last season, however you say that mathematically makes Thorn better than Saunders? (Though of course Saunders pts per game is very slightly better than Thorns, but not really enough to warrant mention).
To use three games with a gelling side a silly basis to extrapolate data from. Doncaster stuck with Saunders. He took repayed them by taking them to joint-top before finding a genuinely better club
Silly me. I must hve tried on Grenduffy's misrepresentation-hat by mistake
i'm glad the term gel has been brought up again
I stated equal to. It was right at the start. Try again
Yes only used on this forum apparently
Has no impact at all.
Football pundits speaking bollox
Come on Mungo.
You know they don't allow us to use the term gelling despite all football experts referring to it.
Also you should just accept that a draw away to Yeovil is unacceptable.
A draw at home to Sheff Utd is unacceptable , even including the goal that was not given by the discriminated against player.
A shit 45 minutes against Bury is enough to be sacked these days.
Mark Robins stand be counted show some loyalty to SISU, you know they will back you through thick and thin.
Mungo would love to meet you for a beer one day
Don't you meet for a drink after your fan club meetings? Got a tip for you. Get Clive platt as a guest speaker next time. Ginnetta will increase your numbers to 5 then.
Isn't it normal for managers to get sacked after relegation, or soon after?
Don't you meet for a drink after your fan club meetings? Got a tip for you. Get Clive platt as a guest speaker next time. Ginnetta will increase your numbers to 5 then.
He's increase it to about 150 usernames(even if still only 5 people) if took Ginetta.
Yes if the relegation was unexpected.
If it was in line with the hand you are dealt.
You usually get 10-15 games of the next season.
Slanderous, but which one will sue you?
We surrendered 30 points from winning positions-not really the sign of a team hopelessly out of its depth...your loyalty towards this man is incredible.
Why are we still discussing the fat, unintelligent and talentless prick? He is history.
Who Grendle ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?