I really like these threads. Andy Thorn is bad. No, Andy Thorn is good. Bad. Good. Bad. Good. Bad. Good. Clueless (someone always throws that one in). Good. Bad. Good. Nice. Nice bloke. Bad. Fat wanker. Good
I really like these threads. Andy Thorn is bad. No, Andy Thorn is good. Bad. Good. Bad. Good. Bad. Good. Clueless (someone always throws that one in). Good. Bad. Good. Nice. Nice bloke. Bad. Fat wanker. Good
Isn't that a bit like the 'if my auntie had bollocks she'd be my uncle' adage?
And the statement only personal conjecture. Others might disagree and state he served up a performance consummate with the investment, depth and quality in his 'squad'. Although I wouldn't, as the therapy is working and I'm almost over last season now, and don't wish to open healing wounds....
I really like these threads. Andy Thorn is bad. No, Andy Thorn is good. Bad. Good. Bad. Good. Bad. Good. Clueless (someone always throws that one in). Good. Bad. Good. Nice. Nice bloke. Bad. Fat wanker. Good
I am pleased to know that. Mutual feelings and all that sort of thing. I bet you are a bundle of laughs in real life when people agree with your thoughts
At the end of the day, when have we gaine from changing managers after a season or two?
Why not give someone the chance to build? I like Thorns philosophy and unlike most of the managers we've had in the past ten years, Thorn is getting better, not worse.
At the end of the day, when have we gaine from changing managers after a season or two?
Why not give someone the chance to build? I like Thorns philosophy and unlike most of the managers we've had in the past ten years, Thorn is getting better, not worse.